Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop SSO/Token Server Components

2013-08-06 Thread Chris Nauroth
Near the bottom of the bylaws, it states that addition of a "New Branch Committer" requires "Lazy consensus of active PMC members." I think this means that you'll need to get a PMC member to sponsor the vote for you. Regular committer votes happen on the private PMC mailing list, and I assume it

Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop SSO/Token Server Components

2013-08-06 Thread Larry McCay
That sounds perfect! I have been thinking of late that we would maybe need an incubator project or something for this - which would be unfortunate. This would allow us to move much more quickly with a set of patches broken up into consumable/understandable chunks that are made functional more ea

Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop SSO/Token Server Components

2013-08-06 Thread Alejandro Abdelnur
yep, that is what I meant. Thanks Chris On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 1:12 PM, Chris Nauroth wrote: > Perhaps this is also a good opportunity to try out the new "branch > committers" clause in the bylaws, enabling non-committers who are working > on this to commit to the feature branch. > > > http://ma

Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop SSO/Token Server Components

2013-08-06 Thread Chris Nauroth
Perhaps this is also a good opportunity to try out the new "branch committers" clause in the bylaws, enabling non-committers who are working on this to commit to the feature branch. http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-general/201308.mbox/%3CCACO5Y4we4d8knB_xU3a=hr2gbeqo5m3vau+inba0li1i

Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop SSO/Token Server Components

2013-08-06 Thread Alejandro Abdelnur
Larry, Sorry for the delay answering. Thanks for laying down things, yes, it makes sense. Given the large scope of the changes, number of JIRAs and number of developers involved, wouldn't make sense to create a feature branch for all this work not to destabilize (more ;) trunk? Thanks again. O

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.1.0-beta

2013-08-06 Thread Arpit Agarwal
Hi Arun, Would it make sense to generate Windows binaries since this is the first 2.0 release with Windows support? I am happy to help out with that. FWIW I generated a Windows tarball from the source, brought up a pseudo-distributed cluster, ran some smoke tests and it is looking good! Thanks,

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-9843) Backport TestDiskChecker to branch-1.

2013-08-06 Thread Chris Nauroth (JIRA)
Chris Nauroth created HADOOP-9843: - Summary: Backport TestDiskChecker to branch-1. Key: HADOOP-9843 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9843 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: I

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-9842) Common auditing log API and facilities

2013-08-06 Thread Kai Zheng (JIRA)
Kai Zheng created HADOOP-9842: - Summary: Common auditing log API and facilities Key: HADOOP-9842 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9842 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvem

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-9841) Manageable login configuration and options for UGI

2013-08-06 Thread Kai Zheng (JIRA)
Kai Zheng created HADOOP-9841: - Summary: Manageable login configuration and options for UGI Key: HADOOP-9841 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9841 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Ty

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-9840) Improve User class for UGI and decouple it from Kerberos

2013-08-06 Thread Kai Zheng (JIRA)
Kai Zheng created HADOOP-9840: - Summary: Improve User class for UGI and decouple it from Kerberos Key: HADOOP-9840 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9840 Project: Hadoop Common Is