+1 (binding)
Arun
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 4:44 PM -0700, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
vino...@apache.orgmailto:vino...@apache.org wrote:
Hi all,
I've created a release candidate RC0 for Apache Hadoop 2.7.0.
The RC is available at: http://people.apache.org/~vinodkv/hadoop-2.7.0-RC0/
The RC
Steve,
From: Steve Loughran ste...@hortonworks.com
Sent: Monday, March 09, 2015 2:15 PM
To: mapreduce-...@hadoop.apache.org; hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org;
common-dev@hadoop.apache.org; yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org
Subject: Hadoop 3.x: what about shipping
Over the last few days, we have had lots of discussions that have intertwined
several major themes:
# When/why do we make major Hadoop releases?
# When/how do we move to major JDK versions?
# To a lesser extent, we have debated another theme: what do we do about trunk?
For now, let's park
Awesome, looks like we can just do this in a compatible manner - nothing else
on the list seems like it warrants a (premature) major release.
Thanks Vinod.
Arun
From: Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli vino...@hortonworks.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 2:30 PM
Andrew,
Thanks for bringing up this discussion.
I'm a little puzzled for I feel like we are rehashing the same discussion from
last year - where we agreed on a different course of action w.r.t switch to
JDK7.
IAC, breaking compatibility for hadoop-3 is a pretty big cost - particularly
for
Sounds good, thanks for the help Vinod!
Arun
From: Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
Sent: Sunday, March 01, 2015 11:43 AM
To: Hadoop Common; Jason Lowe; Arun Murthy
Subject: Re: 2.7 status
Agreed. How about we roll an RC end of this week? As a Java 7+ release
My bad, been sorted distracted.
I agree, we should just roll fwd a 2.7 ASAP with all the goodies.
What sort of timing makes sense? 2 week hence?
thanks,
Arun
From: Jason Lowe jl...@yahoo-inc.com.INVALID
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 8:11 AM
To:
Folks,
With hadoop-2.6 out it's time to think ahead.
As we've discussed in the past, 2.6 was the last release which supports JDK6.
I'm thinking it's best to try get 2.7 out in a few weeks (maybe by the
holidays) with just the switch to JDK7 (HADOOP-10530) and possibly
support for JDK-1.8 (as a
Duh!
$ chmod a+r *
Please try now. Thanks!
Arun
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 7:06 PM, Tsuyoshi OZAWA ozawa.tsuyo...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Arun,
Could you confirm the link and permission to the files is correct? I
got a following error:
Forbidden
You don't have permission to access
Sorry, coming to discussion late.
We all agreed that 2.6 would the *last* release supporting JDK6 and
hadoop-2.7 would drop support for JDK6. We could easily do 2.7 right after
2.6 (maybe with few critical bug-fixes) with the defining feature of 2.7
being *JDK7 only*. I've checked with HBase, Pig
Looks like most of the content is in and hadoop-2.6 is shaping up nicely.
I'll create branch-2.6 by end of the week and we can go from there to
stabilize it - hopefully in the next few weeks.
Thoughts?
thanks,
Arun
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 1:34 PM, Arun C Murthy a...@hortonworks.com wrote:
, Alejandro Abdelnur t...@cloudera.com
wrote:
agree with Steve, lets do a 2.5.1 just with those txt files.
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 2:29 PM, Steve Loughran ste...@hortonworks.com
wrote:
On 19 August 2014 18:35, Arun Murthy a...@hortonworks.com wrote:
I suggest we do a 2.5.1
I suggest we do a 2.5.1 (with potentially other bug fixes) rather than fix
existing tarballs.
thanks,
Arun
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Karthik Kambatla ka...@cloudera.com
wrote:
Hi devs
Tsuyoshi just brought it to my notice that the published tarballs don't
have LICENSE, NOTICE and
We don't involve press@ typically...
Arun
On Aug 12, 2014, at 4:22 PM, Karthik Kambatla ka...@cloudera.com wrote:
Thanks Steve for pointing me to press@. I hadn't realized we need to
include them. Just sent an email.
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 9:39 AM, Steve Loughran ste...@hortonworks.com
Alejandro,
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 4:44 PM, Alejandro Abdelnur t...@cloudera.com
wrote:
After reading this thread and thinking a bit about it, I think it should be
OK such move up to JDK7 in Hadoop 2 for the following reasons:
* Existing Hadoop 2 releases and related projects are running
Thanks everyone. I'll start a vote tmrw if there are no objections.
Arun
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Jitendra Pandey jiten...@hortonworks.com
wrote:
+1, sounds good!
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 12:02 PM, Andrew Wang andrew.w...@cloudera.com
wrote:
+1 here as well, let's do a vote
Akira,
Waiting for one more issue, stay tuned.
thanks,
Arun
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 11:40 PM, Akira AJISAKA
ajisa...@oss.nttdata.co.jpwrote:
Hi Arun,
I'd like to know when to release Hadoop 2.4.1.
It looks like all of the blockers have been resolved.
Thanks,
Akira
(2014/04/24
Based on the discussion at common-dev@, we've decided to target 2.3
off the tip of branch-2 based on the 2 major HDFS features which are
Heterogenous Storage (HDFS-2832) and HDFS Cache (HDFS-4949).
I'll create a new branch-2.3 on (1/24) at 6pm PST.
thanks,
Arun
--
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
Thanks Vinod.
I'll start the work to re-spin 2.3 by changing jira numbers, CHANGES.txt
etc. now.
Arun
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 5:59 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli vino...@apache.org
wrote:
On Jan 22, 2014, at 5:36 PM, Arun C Murthy a...@hortonworks.com wrote:
Agree 2.3 is now very stale.
Sounds good, thanks. I'll ping you off-thread.
Arun
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 6:01 PM, Andrew Wang andrew.w...@cloudera.comwrote:
Hi Arun, thanks for the reply. I hope that I've come across as an earnest
and motivated contributor who wants to help make high-quality releases.
Volunteering
That makes sense too.
On Aug 16, 2013, at 10:39 AM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
vino...@hortonworks.com wrote:
We need to make a call on what blockers will be. From my limited
understanding, this doesn't seem like a API or a compatibility issue. Can we
not fix it in subsequent bug-fix
Ok, I'll spin rc1 after. Thanks.
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 10, 2013, at 11:44 AM, Siddharth Seth seth.siddha...@gmail.com wrote:
Arun, MAPREDUCE-5094 would be a useful jira to include in the 2.0.4-alpha
release. It's not an absolute blocker since the values can be controlled
explicitly by
Sounds great, I'll create the branch for you. Thanks for the your efforts
on this so far!
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 4:58 PM, Bikas Saha bi...@hortonworks.com wrote:
Hi,
branch-1-win was created to stage the work needed to make Hadoop run
natively on Windows. There has been great progress on it
Eli,
I'd check against the svn tag which corresponds to the release...
I'm traveling right now, let get back in a bit.
thanks,
Arun
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 10, 2012, at 9:55 PM, Eli Collins e...@cloudera.com wrote:
Hey Arun,
Was looking at the 23.0 release bits and noticed that the
Depending on the version of Hadoop you are using, you can goto
http://jthost:50030/scheduler to check.
This will work from hadoop-0.20.203 onwards.
Arun
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 30, 2011, at 5:38 PM, shivam tiwari shivam.tiwari2...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
please tell me how I can check
Awesome, thanks to both you guys! It's very exciting to see this progress!
Arun
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 23, 2011, at 5:14 PM, Ralph Castain r...@open-mpi.org wrote:
FWIW: I can commit the OMPI part of your patch for you. The CCLA is intended
to ensure that people realize the need to
On Nov 23, 2011, at 5:32 PM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote:
Hi Matt,
quick question: any reason we are ignoring multifilewc from hadoop examples?
Roman - It isn't marked as a blocker nor is there a patch.
Can you provide one?
Arun
Tim,
It's highly unlikely you'll see a stable 0.21 at this point.
You can ask for a backport to 0.20.2xx (pls open a jira, better yet, a
patch :) ) or consider trying hadoop-0.23 which we just released. Fair
warning: 0.23 is very much 'alpha' quality currently.
thanks,
Arun
Sent from my iPhone
That is a normal use case.
I'd encourage you to use Java MR (even pig/hive).
If you really want to use your legacy app use streaming with a map cmd
such as 'hadoop fs -cat file | mylegacyexe'
Arun
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 23, 2011, at 8:00 AM, Zhixuan Zhu z...@calpont.com wrote:
I'll
29 matches
Mail list logo
