Re: Disable some of the Hudson integration comments on JIRA

2015-12-01 Thread Steve Loughran
> On 1 Dec 2015, at 00:03, Allen Wittenauer wrote: > > >> On Nov 30, 2015, at 3:46 PM, Chris Nauroth wrote: >> >> To be exhaustive, we'd also add the various -Drequire options for full >> inclusion of all optional native components. Unfortunately, that gets >> tricky because of the various b

Re: Disable some of the Hudson integration comments on JIRA

2015-11-30 Thread Allen Wittenauer
> On Nov 30, 2015, at 3:46 PM, Chris Nauroth wrote: > > To be exhaustive, we'd also add the various -Drequire options for full > inclusion of all optional native components. Unfortunately, that gets > tricky because of the various build pre-requisites which would need to be > present on the Jen

Re: Disable some of the Hudson integration comments on JIRA

2015-11-30 Thread Chris Nauroth
To be exhaustive, we'd also add the various -Drequire options for full inclusion of all optional native components. Unfortunately, that gets tricky because of the various build pre-requisites which would need to be present on the Jenkins hosts. This is where the Dockerfile is helpful, because it

Re: Disable some of the Hudson integration comments on JIRA

2015-11-30 Thread Andrew Wang
I went ahead and turned off JIRA notification for all the "other" jobs I could find, if you see more than one Hudson email from now on feel free to ping me or turn it off yourself. The jobs are also still running, just not JIRA commenting anymore. I did also add the native nvn args to Hadoop-trunk

Re: Disable some of the Hudson integration comments on JIRA

2015-11-30 Thread Andrew Wang
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Allen Wittenauer wrote: > > > On Nov 30, 2015, at 11:33 AM, Andrew Wang > wrote: > > > > Good point Allen. So I guess the broader question is, do we find the > > per-commit tracking build and test useful? With our current flakiness > > levels, there isn't much si

Re: Disable some of the Hudson integration comments on JIRA

2015-11-30 Thread Allen Wittenauer
> On Nov 30, 2015, at 11:33 AM, Andrew Wang wrote: > > Good point Allen. So I guess the broader question is, do we find the > per-commit tracking build and test useful? With our current flakiness > levels, there isn't much signal from a FAILED on one of these integration > jobs. I think Hadoop-t

Re: Disable some of the Hudson integration comments on JIRA

2015-11-30 Thread Colin P. McCabe
+1. Colin On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 11:33 AM, Andrew Wang wrote: > Good point Allen. So I guess the broader question is, do we find the > per-commit tracking build and test useful? With our current flakiness > levels, there isn't much signal from a FAILED on one of these integration > jobs. I thin

Re: Disable some of the Hudson integration comments on JIRA

2015-11-30 Thread Andrew Wang
Good point Allen. So I guess the broader question is, do we find the per-commit tracking build and test useful? With our current flakiness levels, there isn't much signal from a FAILED on one of these integration jobs. I think Hadoop-trunk-Commit is still nice as a compilation check. So overall I'

Re: Disable some of the Hudson integration comments on JIRA

2015-11-26 Thread Allen Wittenauer
> On Nov 25, 2015, at 5:41 PM, Andrew Wang wrote: > > Hi all, > > Right now we get something like 7 comments from Hudson whenever a change is > committed. Would anyone object if I turned off 6 of them? We have > variations like: > > Hadoop-trunk-Commit > Hadoop-Hdfs-trunk-Java8 > Hadoop-Yarn-t

Re: Disable some of the Hudson integration comments on JIRA

2015-11-26 Thread Ted Yu
Looking at a few Hadoop-trunk-Commit builds, I saw 'Some Enforcer rules have failed.' Below was from build #8895 : [WARNING] Dependency convergence error for org.apache.hadoop:hadoop-auth:3.0.0-SNAPSHOT paths to dependency are: +-org.apache.hadoop:hadoop-common:3.0.0-SNAPSHOT +-org.apache.hadoop

Re: Disable some of the Hudson integration comments on JIRA

2015-11-26 Thread Steve Loughran
> On 26 Nov 2015, at 01:41, Andrew Wang wrote: > > Hi all, > > Right now we get something like 7 comments from Hudson whenever a change is > committed. Would anyone object if I turned off 6 of them? We have > variations like: > > Hadoop-trunk-Commit > Hadoop-Hdfs-trunk-Java8 > Hadoop-Yarn-trun

Re: Disable some of the Hudson integration comments on JIRA

2015-11-25 Thread Vinayakumar B
Yes, thats good idea. -Vinay On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 10:29 AM, Zhe Zhang wrote: > I think that's a good idea. Thanks for the proposal Andrew. > > --- > Zhe Zhang > > On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 5:41 PM, Andrew Wang > wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > Right now we get something like 7 comments from Huds

Re: Disable some of the Hudson integration comments on JIRA

2015-11-25 Thread Zhe Zhang
I think that's a good idea. Thanks for the proposal Andrew. --- Zhe Zhang On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 5:41 PM, Andrew Wang wrote: > Hi all, > > Right now we get something like 7 comments from Hudson whenever a change is > committed. Would anyone object if I turned off 6 of them? We have > variation

Disable some of the Hudson integration comments on JIRA

2015-11-25 Thread Andrew Wang
Hi all, Right now we get something like 7 comments from Hudson whenever a change is committed. Would anyone object if I turned off 6 of them? We have variations like: Hadoop-trunk-Commit Hadoop-Hdfs-trunk-Java8 Hadoop-Yarn-trunk ...etc I propose leaving notifications on for just Hadoop-trunk-Com