01.09.11 21:55, Per Steffensen написав(ла):
Vitalii Tymchyshyn skrev:
Hello.
AFAIK now you still have HDFS NameNode and as soon as NameNode is
down - your cluster is down. So, putting scheduling on the same
machine as NameNode won't make you cluster worse in terms of SPOF (at
least for HW
cluster is down. So, putting scheduling on the same machine as
NameNode won't make you cluster worse in terms of SPOF (at least for HW
failures).
Best regards, Vitalii Tymchyshyn
to be heard.
I am more or less stable on my own patched 0.21 for now and will either
move forward if I will see more project activity or move somewhere else
if it will become less stable.
Best regards, Vitalii Tymchyshyn
over my cluster
simply for har creation task or I can change this timeout (which one)?
Best regards, Vitalii Tymchyshyn
)
at
org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataXceiver.run(DataXceiver.java:111)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619)
4) This, in turn, produces more dir check calls.
5) All the cluster works very slow because of half-working node.
Best regards, Vitalii Tymchyshyn
