oalexeev01/12/17 08:14:55
jakarta-commons-sandbox/services - New directory
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
oalexeev01/12/17 08:15:13
jakarta-commons-sandbox/services/src - New directory
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is there a (or plans for a) standardize Jakarta Persistence Framework?
I've built about 7 projects now on EJB, about 4 of them on top of Struts
as well. I consider myself an expert at EJB, and I'm also at the point
where I'm sick of it -- too overkill a framework, too much work to
establish your
I'm very interested in such a thing. I'm in much of a similar position and
would like to try and submit design ideas into it.
My biggest problem with Struts was that coders kept passing Form objects
down to the EJBs, thus tying the EJBs to Struts. So my design there used a
generic Namespace
I see where you're going with that...
If I understand you correctly, your framework is simpler than mine even
-- a pretty thin layer over JDBC, whereby all table access is via
generic functions to open a table (or maybe a query?) and iterate
through it's raw rows.
My framework is closer to EJB
-Original Message-
From: Bryan Field-Elliot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 11:59 AM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: Jakarta Persistence Framework?
Still I'm hoping to hear from others as to whether there already is
something like
From: Bryan Field-Elliot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
I see where you're going with that...
If I understand you correctly, your framework is simpler than
mine even
-- a pretty thin layer over JDBC, whereby all table access is
via generic functions to open a table (or maybe a query?) and
hi donnie
i think that the code now in cvs should fix your problem.
could you give it a try?
- robert
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on 12/17/01 10:53 AM, Michael Bayne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2001-12-17 18:42:08, Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Scott Ambler probably has the best collection of links:
http://www.ambysoft.com/persistenceLayer.html
I compiled a list of projects when looking into this a few
on 12/17/01 11:51 AM, Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Aha! Then I'd better keep my eye on Torque. ;-) Having the framework handle
the more complex situations, such as joined tables, is what would make it
really valuable. Avoiding the grunt work for the easy stuff is nice, but
doing
As you can all see, Robert Donkin has submitted many fine patches to
Digester, BeanUtils, Betwixt and others. His work is of high caliber
and I would like to see him as a comitter here at the Commons.
He is a comitter on the ECS project, so he can already play in the
sandbox. I would like him
Cases (2) and (3) are the highest on my priority list. Case (3) is what
Struts users are concerned about -- right now, Struts requires you to
program a separate bean for every form, and it would be nice not to have
to do that.
A! Noo on case 3! It would be nice not to have to do code
On Mon, 17 Dec 2001, Scott Sanders wrote:
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2001 10:27:24 -0800
From: Scott Sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Jakarta Commons Developers List' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Design
On Mon, 17 Dec 2001, Scott Sanders wrote:
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2001 13:39:56 -0800
From: Scott Sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [VOTE] Robert Donkin as Comitter
As you can all see,
I had started on auto-generating classes based on a
database table as a proof of concept, but I haven't
worked on it anymore since I found out it about
Torque, Castor, etc. I liked the idea of keeping
things very simple and generating jdbc code that you
would have written yourself so it would be
+1
I've wondered why he isn't already a committer!
--
Martin Cooper
- Original Message -
From: Scott Sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 1:39 PM
Subject: [VOTE] Robert Donkin as Comitter
As you can all see, Robert Donkin has submitted
As you can all see, Robert Donkin has submitted many fine patches to
Digester, BeanUtils, Betwixt and others. His work is of high caliber
and I would like to see him as a comitter here at the Commons.
He is a comitter on the ECS project, so he can already play in the
sandbox. I would
17 matches
Mail list logo