That sample is a piece of crap.
I use a custom made linked list and my Map entries point to the list
nodes. This way you get really good performance since you have a
direct reference to the node you want to remove.
In the Sun sample the mrulist.remove(fname); call has to iterate
trough the
Paulo Gaspar wrote:
Well, we are deprecating that logger as it puts us (Velocity
devs) into the
position to have to support every possible app usage of log4j.
The replacement just takes a category, so you can configure things in your
app as you want (not hope that we provided the
COOL!
I'll look at this !
cheers,
slawek
--- robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Tuesday, January 29, 2002, at 09:40 PM, Slawek
Zachcial wrote:
Hi,
Can you list some betwixt points to be done? Maybe
I
could help? ;-)
hi
any help would be greatly appreciated
Peter Donald wrote:
If you want for Avalon to move all its components across then there is one
thing that needs to be changed. Same thing as it was when Commons was
incepted, same thing I have been saying for ages. If working with Avalon is
not desired then nothing needs to be changed.
-Original Message-
From: Paulo Gaspar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 6:14 AM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Serious problem with MRUMap -- JCS LRU and MRUMap -- RE:
[simplestore] enhancements (was: [simplestore]
-Original Message-
From: Juozas Baliuka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 3:38 AM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: Serious problem with MRUMap -- JCS LRU and MRUMap -- RE:
[simplestore] enhancements (was: [simplestore] inital check in)
dion02/01/31 04:39:06
Modified:latka/xsl/site site.xsl
Log:
Latest version from site-2
Revision ChangesPath
1.3 +2 -1 jakarta-commons/latka/xsl/site/site.xsl
Index: site.xsl
===
RCS
skip
You should try to build it as a memory plugin for JCS. It might require
some element attribute additions (what type of reference) if they are
useful.
The cache hub manages expiration at request time, this could be moved to
a background thread. Cleanup of unused items could result in
-Original Message-
From: Juozas Baliuka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 12:23 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: RE: Serious problem with MRUMap -- JCS LRU and MRUMap -- RE:
[simplestore] enhancements (was: [simplestore] inital check in)
At 11:20 AM 1/31/2002 -0500, you wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Juozas Baliuka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 12:23 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: RE: Serious problem with MRUMap -- JCS LRU and MRUMap -- RE:
[simplestore]
oalexeev02/01/31 08:57:45
Modified:services/src/java/org/apache/commons/services Event.java
EventModule.java EventRegistration.java Leaf.java
Queue.java QueueModule.java Service.java
ServiceManager.java
Well, since the con.open() method creates a new Socket object, it is subject
to the behavior of the Socket class. Unfortunately, at least as of 1.3,
attempting to create a new Socket to a host/port combo that does not answer
blocks indefinately (or at least for a very long time), this can't be
Hopefully a quick question. Here's what I want to do:
1. Take an XML file
2. Use the digester to run through it, create an object and set a bunch of
properties.
3. Then call a method in that object while passing in a Connection object.
How do I do this? Is there a way to call a
To use any of the existing rules, your Connection would have to be on
the stack.
Use digester.push to do this before you call parse(). Note that this
will make your Connection object the top object on the stack.
Alternatively, just create your own rule class and then have it take
your
Yes, that helps. Thanks. I'll try it and let ya know.
-Original Message-
From: Scott Sanders [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 10:26 AM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: RE: Digester user question - How to use objects/parameters not in
the body
Incidentally, it doesn't actually hang indefinately, for me it looks like it
times out after about 3 minutes and 12 seconds.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 1:24 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: httpclient
I sent a message to the list before which I got no response to so I'm trying
again with perhaps a more descriptive subject line and as well am including
more detail of my proposed solution. I am volunteering to take care of the
task listed on the page at
Hello,
This is a known issue, unfortunately.
I brought it up recently (mailing list archives?) after I saw the same problems as you
have.
I opted for your 3rd suggestion in my local version of HTTP Client.
It is too early to put that in the distributed version of HTTP Client for now.
As there
rdonkin 02/01/31 11:20:27
Modified:betwixt/src/java/org/apache/commons/betwixt/expression
Context.java
betwixt/src/test/org/apache/commons/betwixt/expression
TestEvaluation.java
Added:
dlr 02/01/31 11:21:12
Added: util/src/test/org/apache/commons/util
FastPropertyResourceBundle.test.conf
FastPropertyResourceBundleTest.java
Log:
Test from leandro.
Revision ChangesPath
1.1
I've been working with the logging component in the betwixt package. I
noticed it currently defaults to NoOp if log4j or logkit or JDK1.4 are not
on the classpath.
Would it not be more useful to developers in general to default to SimpleLog
with a brief logging level, like WARN or ERROR? Folks
I've made a few changes to the betwixt package in the sandbox
* used a neater Ant build file (from digester) which among other things
makes better generation of cross-referenced javadoc as well as being much
tidier. I've also added all the various sample programs and common test
cases as targets
The LogSource has a static factory method called makeNewLogInstance();
How about following the naming conventions of JAXP and other fairly recent
libraries of just calling this newInstance()? Its not a big deal, it just
seems a bit less of a mouthful to remember.
Also a question. From the code
+1. Go for it.
Scott
-Original Message-
From: James Strachan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 11:16 AM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers
Subject: [logging] makeNewLogInstance() method...
The LogSource has a static factory method called
+0. I am fine with that, but I assume that Craig or Robert had a reason
for NoOpLog being the default. I personally am fine with either, as I
*always* set my Log ;-)
Scott
-Original Message-
From: James Strachan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 11:00 AM
drat!
i didn't get this email until just after i'd just committed some changes -
hope i didn't step on you toes...
those changes all sounds good but have you committed them yet? (i'm a bit
worried since i can't see them when i update using cvs)
- robert
On Thursday, January 31, 2002, at
On Thursday, January 31, 2002, at 07:20 PM, Scott Sanders wrote:
+0. I am fine with that, but I assume that Craig or Robert had a reason
for NoOpLog being the default. I personally am fine with either, as I
*always* set my Log ;-)
i think that this was decided by rodney and morgan (the
Yes, that is some OS-dependent timeout value. 3 min. and 15 seconds or so on Linux,
some other timeout value on Winblows, etc.
Otis
On Thu, 31 January 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Incidentally, it doesn't actually hang indefinately, for me it looks like it
times out after about 3
jstrachan02/01/31 11:56:03
Modified:betwixt PROPOSAL.html STATUS.html build.xml
betwixt/src/java/org/apache/commons/betwixt
ElementDescriptor.java NodeDescriptor.java
XMLIntrospector.java
Hi Robert
- Original Message -
From: robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
i still want to find a fix for that problem of circular references. i'd
really like to see what you think about the solution i've started on.
(don'
t worry i haven't really done much work on it so it'll be no
Maybe an option for what should be the second chance logger among
those two?
Have fun,
Paulo Gaspar
-Original Message-
From: robert burrell donkin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 8:35 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [logging]
rdonkin 02/01/31 12:25:11
Modified:digester STATUS.html build.xml
Log:
Updated java doc copyright date in build.xml
Revision ChangesPath
1.4 +2 -1 jakarta-commons/digester/STATUS.html
Index: STATUS.html
On Thursday, January 31, 2002, at 07:56 PM, James Strachan wrote:
Hi Robert
- Original Message -
From: robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
i still want to find a fix for that problem of circular references. i'd
really like to see what you think about the solution i've started
Alright,
Paulo has a big enough mouth, and he knows where all the good code is,
can I have some +1's to get him in to make io, util, codec, threading,
etc. happen. He was a huge help on logging, and other discussions that
I cannot remember. He has quite an intimate knowledge of a lot of
apache
+1 of course, he has a big mouth ;-) in
avalon, too!
Gerhard
-
That must be wonderful! I don't understand it at all.
-
-Original Message-
From: Scott Sanders [mailto:[EMAIL
+1
- robert
On Thursday, January 31, 2002, at 08:30 PM, Scott Sanders wrote:
Alright,
Paulo has a big enough mouth, and he knows where all the good code is,
can I have some +1's to get him in to make io, util, codec, threading,
etc. happen. He was a huge help on logging, and other
Sh*t Costin!
I was completely convinced that the String argument was the way
to go and you had to come up with a technical argument that
really makes some sense!
=:o/
Now I am divided again! You and your object (bean?) counter habit!
=;o)
Well, I guess that your arguments make a lot of sense
On Fri, 1 Feb 2002, Paulo Gaspar wrote:
Now, since you are also a security freak (like Peter Donald) I
have a (Devil's Advocate) question:
- What is the way to avoid that a hostile logger accesses the
objects that are passed to it?
I'll send a longer email with comments on the logger -
On 1/31/02 4:37 PM, Paulo Gaspar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This one got me by surprise. I thought I would have to contribute
more than the couple of patches I did before.
Nope.
Anyway, everything is upside down:
- I am being nominated committer at the commons without being
committer
I also think that the reason he gave me that authorization
has more to
do with a small demo he finally got today. Maybe before he was
wondering if all these mailing lists weren't just consuming
my time.
(Strange ideas he has!)
Seem to consume a fair bit of my time...
Not
Craig,
Can you get Paulo set up? Or can I do it, and how?
Scott
-Original Message-
From: Geir Magnusson Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 3:43 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [VOTE] New committer - Paulo Gaspar
On 1/31/02
hammant 02/01/31 16:16:38
Modified:altrmi/src/java/org/apache/commons/altrmi/client/impl
AbstractAltrmiFactory.java BaseServedObject.java
ServerClassAltrmiFactory.java
altrmi/src/java/org/apache/commons/altrmi/common
hammant 02/01/31 16:17:00
Modified:altrmi build.xml tests.xml
Log:
alternate facades can be arrays in return types
Revision ChangesPath
1.7 +6 -4 jakarta-commons-sandbox/altrmi/build.xml
Index: build.xml
Don't spoil my drama!
=;o)
Paulo
-Original Message-
From: Scott Sanders [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 12:13 AM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: RE: [VOTE] New committer - Paulo Gaspar
I don't see how that would depress you. You have
Answer inline:
-Original Message-
From: Ignacio J. Ortega [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 12:19 AM
To: 'Jakarta Commons Developers List'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [VOTE] New committer - Paulo Gaspar
First of all +1 for Paulo as Committer, we
Well... paulo if there is no other one.
=:o)
Thanks Sam,
Paulo
-Original Message-
From: Sam Ruby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 1:02 AM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: RE: [VOTE] New committer - Paulo Gaspar
Scott Sanders wrote:
Can
LOL
Do not encourage me!
=:o)
Have fun,
Paulo
-Original Message-
From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 12:56 AM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [VOTE] New committer - Paulo Gaspar
+1 for Paulo too.
Thanks Sam,
Paulo
-Original Message-
From: Sam Ruby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 1:35 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Request for a new Apache IDs
Please create the following new
I'd like to make a couple of suggestions for the Pool project:
1) Marker interface for poolKeys (for the KeyedPools)
2) The interface to borrow from a pool should throw a checked exception,
returning to a pool should not.
I'd be happy to provide patches should it be required.
Keep up the good
Thanks Manoj,
Paulo
-Original Message-
From: Manoj Kasichainula [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 3:25 AM
To: Sam Ruby
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Request for a new Apache IDs
On Thu, Jan
On Thu, Jan 31, 2002 at 07:34:41PM -0500, Sam Ruby wrote:
Please create the following new Apache ID:
id: paulo
done
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I added a better map storage to stratum.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 10:56 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: cvs commit:
jakarta-turbine-stratum/src/java/org/apache/stratum/util/lru
LRUStore.java
Documentation error in org/apache/commons/collections/Bag.java
If the bag contains less than i occurences, the item itwm will be
removed from the unique set implies that if the bag contains 5
occurences and i is 5, (5 is not less than 5) then the item will not be
removed from the unique set,
Ambiguous documentation in
org/apache/commons/collections/FilterIterator.java
The FilterIterator does not specify whether it *returns* objects that
match the predicate, or whether it ignores (i.e. does not return)
objects that match the predicate. This patch clarifies the API
documentation.
The following patch fixes the following problems with
org.apache.commons.collections.AbstractBag:
- Documentation does not specify exactly what a subcless needs to do to
extend AbstractBag to make a concrete subclass.
- AbstractBag.add(Object,int) has two calls to getCount(o), when only
one
I've submitted this patch twice now (once back in mid-November, once a
week ago), but it still has yet to be committed. The patch is
essentially a complete rewrite of the SequencedHashMap class and fixes
the following problems:
- Adding and removing from the map is O(n) because the linked list
56 matches
Mail list logo
