Re: Latka Questions

2002-03-22 Thread Morgan Delagrange
- Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 11:45 PM Subject: RE: Latka Questions > A short bit of recent history on Latka. > > We never used to have much in the way of docs, so that was my first

Re: [Collections] non-compatible changes

2002-03-22 Thread Morgan Delagrange
- Original Message - From: "Michael A. Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 5:58 PM Subject: Re: [Collections] non-compatible changes > On Fri, 22 Mar 2002, James Strachan wrote: > > > It's not ideal, but it's

Re: [PATCH] beanutils build system

2002-03-22 Thread Jeff Turner
Hi Jon, Would you be happy (ie, would it build on your system) if we applied the patch with the following modifications? 1) Source ${basedir}/build.properties before ${user.home}/build.properties Many people have a ~/build.properties with default values, which only needs to be overridden by ./b

RE: Latka Questions

2002-03-22 Thread dion
"Waldhoff, Rodney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 23/03/2002 01:46:36 AM: > I don't think Latka's quite this smart yet, although you're not the only one > who would like it to be. In the immortal words of Shrek: "It's on my todo list!" [snip] > Latka can currently do this, but you need to tell

cvs commit: jakarta-commons-sandbox/lang default.properties build.xml build.properties.sample

2002-03-22 Thread jon
jon 02/03/22 16:43:01 Modified:lang build.xml Added: lang default.properties Removed: lang build.properties.sample Log: fixing up build systems... -jon Revision ChangesPath 1.6 +10 -79jakarta-commons-sandbox/lang/build.xml

RE: [Latka] Developer's Guide / Coding Style

2002-03-22 Thread ringo . desmet
> public void close() throws SQLException { >_sourcePool.returnObject(this); > } The public close method is well-defined by the Connection interface, so no problem here. > private void _close() throws SQLException { >_delegate.close(); > } This method is a bit d

RE: [Latka] Developer's Guide / Coding Style

2002-03-22 Thread Waldhoff, Rodney
The pool (or more accurately, the PooledConnectionFactory used by the pool) when it's evicting PooledConnections. The example is incomplete, and as you've quietly pointed out, not quite right. It would have to be a protected method, or be invoked by something else within PooledConnection (e.g.,

RE: [Latka] Developer's Guide / Coding Style

2002-03-22 Thread ringo . desmet
> Here's an example of what I'm talking about: > > public class PooledConnection extends Connection { > public PooledConnection(Connection delegate) { > _delegate = delagate; > } > > public void someMethod() throws SQLException { > _delegate.someMethod(); > } >

RE: [Latka] Developer's Guide / Coding Style

2002-03-22 Thread Waldhoff, Rodney
> One could question if there isn't anything wrong with the naming of the > methods. Do you have an example of such a scenario that we could use to > discuss? Here's an example of what I'm talking about: public class PooledConnection extends Connection { public PooledConnection(Connection de

RE: [Latka] Developer's Guide / Coding Style

2002-03-22 Thread ringo . desmet
> > private methods also begin with an underscore > > I think I've been known to do this on rare occasions (mainly > when there is > some public method and protected/private method with an > otherwise identical > signature) but I wouldn't claim it to be "conventional" in > any sense of the

RE: [HttpClient] Still problems with null domains and paths

2002-03-22 Thread Marc Saegesser
Vincent, I've written quite a bit on this topic over the last few weeks, so you might find some of the stuff in list archives useful. I'll try to summarize things again here. All cookies have a domain and path associated with them. The path can be specified explicitly using attributes on the s

[Latka] Developer's Guide / Coding Style

2002-03-22 Thread Waldhoff, Rodney
At http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/latka/developers-guide.html, dion (I assume) wrote: > Latka has some unusual coding conventions, which > I'm trying to capture at the moment using a tool, > CheckStyle. Since I'm not quite sure what all the > conventions are myself, nothing is really > auth

RE: Latka Questions

2002-03-22 Thread Waldhoff, Rodney
I don't think Latka's quite this smart yet, although you're not the only one who would like it to be. > Question 1 -- Selecting a form > > Our app frequently has multiple forms per page. Depending > on what the user chooses to do, one or the other will be > submitted. How can I tell latka which

Re: Latka Questions

2002-03-22 Thread James CE Johnson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > James CE Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 22/03/2002 03:07:58 AM: > > > Hi,, > > > > I've been looking at latka as a testing framework for our application > > and have some specific questions that I can't find the answers to. > Would > > this be the best place to

Re: [Altrmi] PATCH Passing pf remote obj ' ref

2002-03-22 Thread Paul Hammant
Vinay, Nice idea, but we would have to get the BEEP or homegrown multiplexer working first, yes? - Paul >Paul, >org.apache.commons.altrmi.client.impl.stream.StreamInvocationHandler >has synchronized handleInvocation(...) . >With little efforts I guess we can make this >class ThreadSafe and thu