RE: [httpclient] release and development questions

2002-03-28 Thread bob mcwhirter
I don't mean to get (too) religious or philosophical here, but... It seems to me that a ToDo is just a normal Task that is included in a particular Release. Part of project-management is determining which things are going into which release. Instead of maintaining a pre-release todo-list and

cvs commit: jakarta-commons/collections build.xml

2002-03-28 Thread morgand
morgand 02/03/28 07:45:03 Modified:collections build.xml Log: updated source distro task to work more like previous versions Revision ChangesPath 1.26 +6 -2 jakarta-commons/collections/build.xml Index: build.xml

RE: [httpclient] release and development questions

2002-03-28 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Thu, 2002-03-28 at 10:48, Marc Saegesser wrote: I think the recent Tomcat 4.0.x releases have done a good job in this respect. Their release-plan document contains a list of all bug fixes and enhancements (or tasks, if you prefer that term) that are planned to be in the release. When

cvs commit: jakarta-commons-sandbox/morphos - New directory

2002-03-28 Thread nicolaken
nicolaken02/03/28 08:53:02 jakarta-commons-sandbox/morphos - New directory -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [SCRATCHPAD PROPOSAL] Morphos

2002-03-28 Thread Nicola Ken Barozzi
From: Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] I'm writing to this list to ask for the creation of a new module in commons scratchpad called morphos. The scope is to make a simple to use package for file format transformations. Currently we will concentrate on XML. Committers needing access

Re: Digester Rule.digester

2002-03-28 Thread robert burrell donkin
On Thursday, March 28, 2002, at 02:44 AM, Jon Scott Stevens wrote: Why is Rule.digester protected and not private? backwards compatibility - robert -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

cvs commit: jakarta-commons/docs releases.html

2002-03-28 Thread morgand
morgand 02/03/28 10:41:59 Modified:docs releases.html Log: documented new Collections build Revision ChangesPath 1.19 +39 -0 jakarta-commons/docs/releases.html Index: releases.html ===

cvs commit: jakarta-commons/xdocs releases.xml

2002-03-28 Thread morgand
morgand 02/03/28 10:42:07 Modified:xdocsreleases.xml Log: documented new Collections build Revision ChangesPath 1.3 +42 -0 jakarta-commons/xdocs/releases.xml Index: releases.xml ===

RE: Minimum JDK version for HttpClient

2002-03-28 Thread costinm
On Thu, 28 Mar 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, JDK1.2.2 is old and is not worth supporting, but the new GCJ3.0 and J2ME ( The statement above gives me the impression that the author is working in an environment where he can set the platform (development and/or deployment)

RE: [httpclient] release and development questions

2002-03-28 Thread Vincent Massol
-Original Message- From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 28 March 2002 14:17 To: Jakarta Commons Developers List Subject: RE: [httpclient] release and development questions On Thu, 2002-03-28 at 10:00, bob mcwhirter wrote: I don't mean to get (too) religious

Re: Digester Rule.digester

2002-03-28 Thread Jon Scott Stevens
on 3/28/02 9:39 AM, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thursday, March 28, 2002, at 02:44 AM, Jon Scott Stevens wrote: Why is Rule.digester protected and not private? backwards compatibility - robert Can we mark it deprecated and create a new variable? -jon -- To

RE: [httpclient] release and development questions

2002-03-28 Thread dion
bob mcwhirter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 29/03/2002 02:00:22 AM: [snip] Also, part of project management is acheiving deadlines, which many times means pushing some tasks to a later release. Instead of oh, we didn't get to that thing, so let's try to remember to do it for the next release,

RE: [httpclient] release and development questions

2002-03-28 Thread dion
Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 29/03/2002 01:17:13 AM: On Thu, 2002-03-28 at 10:00, bob mcwhirter wrote: That's a good idea, a general task list with various scopes applied over top of it. I will blatantly steal your idea and put it in Maven :-) While we're on Maven :), one of

Re: [SCRATCHPAD PROPOSAL] Morphos

2002-03-28 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr.
On 3/28/02 11:54 AM, Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] I'm writing to this list to ask for the creation of a new module in commons scratchpad called morphos. The scope is to make a simple to use package for file format

RE: [SCRATCHPAD PROPOSAL] Morphos

2002-03-28 Thread Scott Sanders
I personally believe the artificial barrier is just that, artificial. IMHO, an Apache committer is an Apache committer, and I think we should modify the charter. Shall I propose the vote on another thread? Scott -Original Message- From: Geir Magnusson Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

RE: [SCRATCHPAD PROPOSAL] Morphos

2002-03-28 Thread costinm
On Thu, 28 Mar 2002, Scott Sanders wrote: I personally believe the artificial barrier is just that, artificial. IMHO, an Apache committer is an Apache committer, and I think we should modify the charter. Shall I propose the vote on another thread? Please do so ! Costin -- To

cvs commit: jakarta-commons/latka project.xml build-maven.xml

2002-03-28 Thread dion
dion02/03/28 22:51:00 Added: latkaproject.xml build-maven.xml Log: Initial maven project descriptor and build file Revision ChangesPath 1.1 jakarta-commons/latka/project.xml Index: project.xml

cvs commit: jakarta-commons/latka project.xml

2002-03-28 Thread dion
dion02/03/29 00:09:35 Modified:latkaproject.xml Log: Fix mailing list entries to remove mailto: as it appears to be duped Revision ChangesPath 1.3 +3 -3 jakarta-commons/latka/project.xml Index: project.xml

RE: Minimum JDK version for HttpClient

2002-03-28 Thread ringo . desmet
Hello Otis, There is also a HTTPClient library at www.innovation.ch somewhere that probably works with JDK 1.2.2 that you may want to use, instead of hacking Jakarta's HTTP Client to support that version of JDK. Hacking? My impression is that the usage of the two methods from JDK 1.3 in the