dIon, the build file contains some hard-coded paths, that I can't
override via Ant properties from the outside. Could you please have
another look?
Buildfile: build.xml
init:
[mkdir] Created dir: /javastuff/gump/jakarta-commons/jelly/target/lib
get-deps:
compile:
[mkdir] Created dir:
Not-automated as Sam is having some trouble with his system setup ...
[javac]
/javastuff/gump/jakarta-commons-sandbox/attributes/api/src/java/org/apache/commons/attributes/EmptyCachedRepository.java:68:
org.apache.commons.attributes.EmptyCachedRepository should be declared abstract; it
mturk 2003/10/02 00:21:29
Modified:daemon/src/native/nt/procrun procgui.c
Log:
Improve listview parsing and display.
Make sure that the console window popups to foreground
on try dblclick
Revision ChangesPath
1.7 +70 -34
mturk 2003/10/02 00:22:16
Modified:daemon/src/native/nt/procrun procrun.c procrun.h procrun.rc
Log:
Add the Registry key for selecting the console display type.
Revision ChangesPath
1.7 +11 -3 jakarta-commons/daemon/src/native/nt/procrun/procrun.c
Index:
A general question: What do you all consider best practices for testing
interceptors? Currently involves a lot of manual testing, but would like
to move to junit testing for it.
Johan
--
you too?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Ok, will do later tonight (4 hours or so).
--
dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/
Stefan Bodewig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 02/10/2003 04:41:24 PM:
dIon, the build file contains some hard-coded paths, that I can't
override via Ant properties
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23557.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23558.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23560.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
A while back I wrote a generic comparator for Java objects and called it
GComp. Weve been using it internally at the company where I work, but I was
wondering if it might not be of value to the commons project.
Typically Java programmers create a custom Comparator implementation for
every
Maybe related to being behind a firewall? Can you use regular ftp
tools and are you using a passive connection?
On Wed, 01 Oct 2003 12:26:34 -0600, Kris Nuttycombe [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Hello, all - any help is appreciated. I'm having difficulty using
the commons.net.ftp.FTPClient when
This looks pretty darn good. Just a few thoughts/observations:
1) Could we just merge ConstructorFactory into BuilderFactory, to provide both sets of
options
(using constructors, then optionally setting properties).
2) Could we use
Howard M. Lewis Ship wrote:
This looks pretty darn good. Just a few thoughts/observations:
1) Could we just merge ConstructorFactory into BuilderFactory, to provide both sets of
options
(using constructors, then optionally setting properties).
I really like the idea as long as we have both
The framework jar includes a base class for tests with many utility methods.
You can read a module descriptor and convert it into a registry. Create a test
service and extend
the implemention with the interceptor.
Invoke the methods of the service to see if the interceptor does its job.
For
I just didn't list out the other primitive types (boolean, long, double, etc.)
service-id/ would be the constructed service's id, as a string, alternative to
construct
service-id-property=.../
service service-id=.../ would be a reference to some other service, analagous to
set-service
Ah, I see. Should we stick with our convention of passing values via
attributes, may be? But if you are planning on allowing OGNL
expressions, the other form may be convenient, but I am not sure if we
need to allow expressions in the descriptor though.
-Harish
Howard M. Lewis Ship wrote:
I
1) Could we just merge ConstructorFactory into BuilderFactory, to provide
both sets of options
(using constructors, then optionally setting properties).
Certainly. I made some sacrifices to make this eventual step as painless as
possible.
2) Could we use
craigmcc2003/10/02 09:17:57
Modified:logging/src/java/org/apache/commons/logging/impl
Jdk13LumberjackLogger.java Jdk14Logger.java
Log4JLogger.java LogKitLogger.java NoOpLog.java
Log:
Remove final declaration on the Log implementations
On Thu, 2003-10-02 at 02:12, Henri Yandell wrote:
I'm a bit confused with Collections atm.
'ant test' calls src/test/org/apache/commons/collections/TestAll.java.
However this does not list tests in sub-packages that I can see [though I
imagine things like the iterators package could be
Here's a patch adressing all your points, except 4 ;-). Also there is more
testing required. I'll try to find out what the best way is to test this
service.
Of course this is a new patch not adding to the previous one. So to take a
look at it patch it to a fresh grab from HEAD.
--knut
Howard M.
Same patch with a quite obvious small tweak (how could I miss that?), which
should also make it more readable...
--knut
Knut Wannheden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Here's a patch adressing all your points, except 4 ;-). Also there is more
testing required. I'll try
On Thu, 2003-10-02 at 16:42, Henri Yandell wrote:
On 2 Oct 2003, Janek Bogucki wrote:
On Thu, 2003-10-02 at 02:12, Henri Yandell wrote:
I'm a bit confused with Collections atm.
'ant test' calls src/test/org/apache/commons/collections/TestAll.java.
However this does not list
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23491.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23560.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23560.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On 2 Oct 2003, Janek Bogucki wrote:
On Thu, 2003-10-02 at 16:42, Henri Yandell wrote:
Why should both not do the same?
When I type 'ant test' and 'maven test', they should be equivalent. Unless
we decide to drop ant or maven support.
The outcome of my suggested changes was meant
I just noticed that Maven-generated Commons (sub)project pages don't point
to:
http://jakarta.apache.org/site/mail.html
for mailing lists and instead allow you to directly subscribe or
unsubscribe without reading the mailing list guidelines. If I've
accidentally dredged up an old topic, just
hlship 2003/10/02 11:42:06
Modified:hivemind/framework/src/test/hivemind/test/services/impl
RunnableImpl.java
hivemind/framework/src/test/hivemind/test/services
TestThreadedModel.java
Hi,
the current XML schema supports doesn't work with Xerces 2.3/2.4/2.5
(only 2.1 finaly) (at least that's the case with Tomcat 5). The attached
patch remove the current implementation. People interested to use the
digester with schema/dtd should use instead:
Tagged to the right commons project.
You might want to look at how beanutils accesses bean properties - its
slightly different to how you do it.
Stephen
- Original Message -
From: Wickus Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A while back I wrote a generic comparator for Java objects and called it
matth 2003/10/02 15:34:44
Modified:collections/src/test/org/apache/commons/collections/decorators
TestAll.java
Added: collections/src/java/org/apache/commons/collections/decorators
SetList.java
scolebourne2003/10/02 15:35:31
Modified:collections/src/test/org/apache/commons/collections/decorators
TestTypedBag.java TestTransformedSortedBag.java
TestPredicatedSortedBag.java TestPredicatedBag.java
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22826.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
scolebourne2003/10/02 15:48:41
Modified:collections/src/test/org/apache/commons/collections/observed
TestObservableSet.java TestObservableSortedSet.java
collections/src/test/org/apache/commons/collections
TestMap.java
That would work. I had another idea on my way home. What if the
constructRegistry threw an exception if there was any problem in the
construction, that is after the registry is built? That way the
application can decide what to do. What do you think about that?
-Harish
Howard M. Lewis Ship
scolebourne2003/10/02 16:43:22
Modified:primitives PROPOSAL.html
Log:
Fix typo
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +1 -1 jakarta-commons-sandbox/primitives/PROPOSAL.html
Index: PROPOSAL.html
===
RCS
scolebourne2003/10/02 16:46:54
Modified:collections build.xml
Log:
Add ability to create testframework jar
Revision ChangesPath
1.44 +40 -5 jakarta-commons/collections/build.xml
Index: build.xml
This sounds OK, but what would the method be called?
OrderedSet.decorate()
OrderedSet.decorateHashSet()
?
Stephen
- Original Message -
From: Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Basically, the lack of empty constructors with default decoration
decisions. Example I'm looking at:
I want
On Thursday, October 2, 2003 at 19:21:46 (-0400) Harish Krishnaswamy writes:
That would work. I had another idea on my way home. What if the
constructRegistry threw an exception if there was any problem in the
construction, that is after the registry is built? That way the
application can
I would prefer something like:
OrderedSet.defaultInstance()
or
OrderedSet.newInstance()
It seems more standard... what do you think?
Stephen Colebourne wrote:
This sounds OK, but what would the method be called?
OrderedSet.decorate()
OrderedSet.decorateHashSet()
?
Stephen
- Original
Dear Jakarta Commons Development Team,
(http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/)
Hello,
Apache newsletter is in progress of preparing the second all-Apache
newsletter, news from August to September 2003, which will be
published in the middle of October 2003.
=== What is The Apache Newsletter? ===
I love coding against this class, in that it catches so many things. I
hate just how painful Maps are to code fully :)
I half think this should form part of some kind of
JUnit-Collections-compliancy jar or application.
Hen
-
Odi,
No worries. Take your time to polish it. I just wanted to know what was going on, as
PR #22654 is the only thing that blocks 2.0rc2 release.
Oleg
-Original Message-
From: Ortwin Glück [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 09:35
To: Commons HttpClient Project
Kalnichevski, Oleg wrote:
No worries. Take your time to polish it. I just wanted to know what was going on, as PR #22654 is the only thing that blocks 2.0rc2 release.
Okay, I hope to have it ready until next week. It shouldn't be that hard
to do as the documentation on Checkstyle is quite good.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23431.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15435.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22654.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22654.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15435.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Dear Jakarta Commons-HttpClient Development Team,
(http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/httpclient/)
Hello,
Apache newsletter is in progress of preparing the second all-Apache
newsletter, news from August to September 2003, which will be
published in the middle of October 2003.
=== What is The
50 matches
Mail list logo
