This email is autogenerated from the output from:
/home/bodewig/dev/gump/log/commons-attributes.html
Buildfile: build.xml
init:
[mkdir] Created dir:
Hi,
the commons-dbcp failure (and some others) at
http://gump.covalent.net/log/ are due to the fact that the generated
commons-pool.jar contains a classes directory as its top level
(i.e. it contains
classes/org/apache/commons/pool/BaseKeyedObjectPool.class instead of
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23669.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23669.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
--On Thursday, October 2, 2003 9:33 PM +0100 Stephen Colebourne
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please can you create a new account for Arun. You should have received a
committers agreement.
Account created, password sent. -- justin
But I notes from the debug log that the system creates multiple
instances of the BuilderFactory the interceptor - one for each
invoke-factory config in the xml file. If I replace my interceptor
with the hivemind.LoggingInterceptor, the behavior is the same.
I would like to know if
--- Robert Leland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Graham wrote:
The validation rules are only exposed if you use Struts'
html:javascript
Not true they are exposed by server side validation also. The error
messages clearly state the min/max
values.
But those error messages are
--- Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Robert Leland wrote:
David Graham wrote:
The validation rules are only exposed if you use Struts'
html:javascript
Not true they are exposed by server side validation also. The error
messages clearly state the min/max
Has anyone done any work on a caching service? I implemented a simple
LRU cache that works for now but may need a more sophisticated caching
service later. Anyone has any suggestions?
Thanks,
Harish
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
dirkv 2003/10/08 09:52:17
Modified:pool build.xml
Log:
classes directory at jar top level
fix by Stefan Bodewig
Revision ChangesPath
1.21 +2 -2 jakarta-commons/pool/build.xml
Index: build.xml
dirkv 2003/10/08 09:52:26
Modified:dbcp build.xml
Log:
classes directory at jar top level
fix by Stefan Bodewig
Revision ChangesPath
1.22 +2 -2 jakarta-commons/dbcp/build.xml
Index: build.xml
Patch to NTP/SNTP implementation submission from last month including
some junit tests, more javadoc comments, and some cleanup wrt to the Sun
Java Code Conventions.
--jason
--
Jason Mathews [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The MITRE Corporation http://www.mitre.org/
Bedford, MA 01730-1407
net-NTP.zip
applied
Thanks
Dirk
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
Hi,
the commons-dbcp failure (and some others) at
http://gump.covalent.net/log/ are due to the fact that the generated
commons-pool.jar contains a classes directory as its top level
(i.e. it contains
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23680.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23680.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hello,
How about returning the argument instead of void for these APIs such that
they can be used in expressions?
Now ArrayUtils:
public static void reverse(final Object[] array) {
Proposal:
public static Object[] reverse(final Object[] array) {
I ran into this with the Object[] version of
I think I like it BUT the issue you raise is an orthogonal one.
(1) A method that returns void cannot be used in an expression, period.
Client can always ignore the return value and it does not cost the app
anything.
(2) Whether or not the array is twiddled in-place or not is a separate issue
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23683.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23683.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I would have a look at the Joda typeconvertors.
They concentrate on Object-String and String-Object. Add Object-Object
later if anyone really needs it.
They also have a mechanism for dealing with superclass/subclass
relationships. You can register a TypeConvertorFactory that creates
I agree that reverseAsCopy or reverseCopy are the best names. Whichever
you choose is fine with me.
I understand that void methods can't be used in expressions, that why I
think your suggestions are a good idea. My desire is to differentiate
between methods which modify the array arg and
I would agree that reverse() should probably return the array, however this
is a nasty backwards compatable change, seems harmless but actually messes
up anyone where two OSS projects require different versions of lang. (We
made some incompatble changes in 2.0, but I'm aiming to avoid these
Any thoughts on how to fix this issue?
or how the current code should work?
I got it to work by adding the following to
InstanceKeyObjectFactory.getObjectInstance
if (obj == null) {
PerUserPoolDataSource ds = new
PerUserPoolDataSource();
Hi All,
I am started using Apache Commons Net package for Java FTP Application ,
presently I am facing problem in connecting to Remote FTP Server , Its
very helpful if some one tells me how to connect to remote FTP using
socks. If possible kindly provide me code piece to do same.
Regards,
Here is a proposal that I think addresses all issues but I am not sure why
changing reverse() to return something instead of void is not backwards
compatible (granted you need to recompile). Are we saying that we want
binary compatibility. It seems ok to ask folks to recompile.
1) reverse does
The way I wrote InstanceKeyObjectFactory it expected that an instance of
PerUserPoolDataSource would be created and bound to a jndi context. In
such a case, the Reference as returned by getReference() method of
InstanceKeyDataSource would be used and things should work properly.
It appears in
I don't see a need to deprecate the existing methods. In methods such
as reverse(Object[]), I think the default behavior would be to modify
the argument. That's the way that methods in java.util.Arrays as
java.util.Collections behave. However, as I've said, I think that
reverseAsCopy
Hmm... my main proposal seems to have gotten lost in the shuffle (sorry,
couldn't resist).
Proposal:
void reverse(type[] array)
Becomes:
type[] reverse(type[] array)
The input array is returned. That's it.
--
To follow the shuffle, this lets shuffle lie:
- Original Message -
From: Gary Gregory [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Here is a proposal that I think addresses all issues but I am not sure why
changing reverse() to return something instead of void is not backwards
compatible (granted you need to recompile). Are we saying that we want
binary
+1
On Tue, 2003-10-07 at 23:16, Michael Becke wrote:
I propose that we mark the latest code in CVS HTTPCLIENT_2_0_BRANCH as
RC2 and proceed with a release. Please vote as follows:
--
Vote: HttpClient 2.0 RC2
Oleg Kalnichevski wrote:
Are there any reasons for NOT automatically releasing connection? I
can't think of any.
Right. I think HttpClient should abstract the physical connections away
from the user. So connection handling must be completely inside
HttpClient. The only exception is that the
+1
Michael Becke wrote:
I propose that we mark the latest code in CVS HTTPCLIENT_2_0_BRANCH as
RC2 and proceed with a release. Please vote as follows:
--
Vote: HttpClient 2.0 RC2 release
[ ] +1 I am in favor of the
Hi everyone!
I'd like to ask some question about http pool in commons-httpclient.
As i read, MultiTrheadedHttpConnectionManager is the manger responsible for
handling the connection in a multi-thread enviroment.
I want to use this to create a private HttpClient property in a servlet
class, so each
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23663.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23663.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
35 matches
Mail list logo
