DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28597] - Test Suite for Jakarta Commons Net POP3 module Parts 2-5

2004-04-26 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28597. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28597] - Test Suite for Jakarta Commons Net POP3 module Parts 2-5

2004-04-26 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28597. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28597] - Test Suite for Jakarta Commons Net POP3 module Parts 2-5

2004-04-26 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28597. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28596] - Tests for Commons Net POP3 module Part 1 of 5

2004-04-26 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28596. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: [vfs] request of new versions of dependency jars to ibiblio?

2004-04-26 Thread Mark R. Diggory
I'll get this into the commons site documentation. -Mark Mario Ivankovits wrote: matthew.hawthorne wrote: Submit a bug to maven-upload-requests on the codehaus Jira installation. I don't know the exact url, but it's probably on maven.apache.org somewhere. Found it at:

Re: [logging] [proposal] Log.getChildLogger(String) method and managed environments

2004-04-26 Thread Herve Quiroz
Neeme, I thought I could share my thoughts on this subject, more as a user of [logging] rather than a developper. I've been using [logging] in many of my projects until recently when I needed inversion of control stuff. I have since switched to Avalon Framework Logger API. Actually, it's the

Re: [collections] Bag interface

2004-04-26 Thread Michael Heuer
On Mon, 26 Apr 2004, Stephen Colebourne wrote: The current Bag interface has the following javadoc warning: * iNote that this interface violates the [EMAIL PROTECTED] Collection} contract./i * The behavior specified in many of these methods is inot/i the same * as the behavior

cvs commit: jakarta-commons/math/src/java/org/apache/commons/math/stat/univariate package.html

2004-04-26 Thread brentworden
brentworden2004/04/26 11:28:18 Modified:math/src/java/org/apache/commons/math package.html math/src/java/org/apache/commons/math/stat/univariate/summary package.html math/src/java/org/apache/commons/math/analysis package.html

customizing debugging levels per httpclient instance

2004-04-26 Thread Jorrit Kronjee
Hello, I have an application consisting of two threads. Both threads have an own instance of httpclient and use it for different things. I would like to see the wire of one of the threads, but suppress the other. I use log4j. log4j can set the debugging level (trace or not) based on

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26070] - [RFE] Allow streaming of POST methods via chunked transfer encoding.

2004-04-26 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26070. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

RE: Problems using SSL from inside JBoss (jsse problem?)

2004-04-26 Thread Kalnichevski, Oleg
Fredrik, This problem is clearly not HttpClient related, hence you have not been getting a lot of responses. HttpClient simply expects JSSE to be there and be properly configured in order for the HTTPS support to be functional. Please take a look at the HttpClient SSL guide paying special

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25372] - auto close idle connections

2004-04-26 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25372. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

RE: customizing debugging levels per httpclient instance

2004-04-26 Thread Kalnichevski, Oleg
Jorrit, HttpClient relies on commons-logging toolkit to do all its logging. The commons-logging itself is merely an abstraction layer intended to provide a uniform interface to different logging toolkits. If there is a toolkit capable of assigning different appenders on per thread basis, then

RE: Problem with Binary release, 2-15-2004 Zip

2004-04-26 Thread Kalnichevski, Oleg
Brit, There are currently two HttpClient branches: CVS HEAD (development, no longer compatible with the 2.0 API) and the 2.0 compatible branch (stable). I suspect you have gotten the PostXML code off CVS HEAD, which does not compile against 2.0 final. Please try examples shipped with

RE: Problem with Binary release, 2-15-2004 Zip

2004-04-26 Thread Pair, Brit
Not sure I understand. I downloaded the 2.0 Binary Release Build and the 2.0 Source Release Build and they have different APIs. I would expect that compiling the source would produce something compatible with the downloaded binary. Something is either not marked clearly or the Binary download

RE: Problem with Binary release, 2-15-2004 Zip

2004-04-26 Thread Kalnichevski, Oleg
Brit, I just downloaded a fresh copy of commons-httpclient-2.0-src.zip and managed to compile everything the complete source including the examples after having added commons-logging.jar and junit.jar to the project classpath. Then I compiled the examples only using the jar shipped with the

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26070] - [RFE] Allow streaming of POST methods via chunked transfer encoding.

2004-04-26 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26070. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25372] - auto close idle connections

2004-04-26 Thread Michael Becke
No worries. That was what I assumed :) Mike On Apr 26, 2004, at 12:22 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25372. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS