rdonkin 2004/10/03 01:14:03
Modified:betwixt/xdocs Tag: RELEASE_0_6_BRANCH index.xml
Log:
Updated documentation to reflect release
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No revision
1.9.2.3 +5 -1
The following comment has been added to this issue:
Author: dion gillard
Created: Sun, 3 Oct 2004 1:52 AM
Body:
Backing out the change and re-running the test results in a clean build.
It's not the working directory AFAICT, it's the patch.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28482.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31515.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-resources has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31516.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31516.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
Kim van der Linde wrote:
Hi All,
I have a question. All evaluate methods are non-static, but they do not
depend on information stored already in the class. That would suggest
for me to make them static So, I guess that there is a compelling
reason not to do that, but one that I do not
Kim van der Linde wrote:
Hi Phil,
I have been thinking for a few days on the Matrix classes.
I think the Matrix class itself should contain all those methods that do
matrix calculations (add, subtract, multiply) that either a Matrix
themselfs or proporties of the Matrix (isSingular for example).
Phil Steitz wrote:
I agree here as well. Do you see use cases where you will want to start
with a double[][] array, perform matrix operations on it (say some
decomposition) and then run stats on the resulting matrix? Will it be
too onerous to make copies of the double[][] at each stage? If
dgraham 2004/10/03 08:58:17
Modified:dbutils/src/java/org/apache/commons/dbutils QueryRunner.java
dbutils/xdocs changes.xml
Log:
Changed QueryRunner to call getDataSource() internally instead of
using instance variable directly.
Revision ChangesPath
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31460.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
dgraham 2004/10/03 09:14:44
Modified:dbutils/src/java/org/apache/commons/dbutils QueryLoader.java
dbutils/xdocs changes.xml
Log:
Made loadQueries() protected. PR: 31460
Revision ChangesPath
1.4 +10 -6
dgraham 2004/10/03 09:43:44
Modified:dbutils/src/java/org/apache/commons/dbutils QueryLoader.java
dbutils/xdocs changes.xml
Log:
Use current class' ClassLoader in loadQueries(). PR: 31169
Revision ChangesPath
1.5 +1 -1
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31169.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31045.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31515.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
--- Kim van der Linde [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Phil Steitz wrote:
I agree here as well. Do you see use cases where you will want to start
with a double[][] array, perform matrix operations on it (say some
decomposition) and then run stats on the resulting matrix? Will it be
too
Ok, my question then becomes: why this structure?
Cheers,
Kim
Phil Steitz wrote:
Kim van der Linde wrote:
Hi All,
I have a question. All evaluate methods are non-static, but they do
not depend on information stored already in the class. That would
suggest for me to make them static So, I
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31515.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
dfs 2004/10/03 13:36:03
Modified:net/xdocs faq.xml
Log:
Updated FAQ link to point to new Wiki.
Revision ChangesPath
1.3 +1 -1 jakarta-commons/net/xdocs/faq.xml
Index: faq.xml
===
RCS
Date: 2004-10-03T13:48:59
Editor: DanielSavarese [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wiki: Jakarta Commons Wiki
Page: Net/FrequentlyAskedQuestions
URL: http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/Net/FrequentlyAskedQuestions
no comment
Change Log:
The following comment has been added to this issue:
Author: Hans Gilde
Created: Sun, 3 Oct 2004 2:24 PM
Body:
I'm having truoble getting it to pass at all. You're running maven test?
-
View this comment:
The following comment has been added to this issue:
Author: Hans Gilde
Created: Sun, 3 Oct 2004 3:04 PM
Body:
ok, got it working, debugging the patch now.
-
View this comment:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31518.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Kim van der Linde wrote:
Ok, my question then becomes: why this structure?
Cheers,
Kim
Probably the best answer here is browse the archives. Here are a couple
of relevant threads:
http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/[EMAIL PROTECTED]msgId=756204
http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/[EMAIL
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31519.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Based on the comments on RC1, (mostly on this thread:
http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/[EMAIL PROTECTED]by=threadfrom=889687),
I propose that we include the following changes in RC2:
1) Rename .univariate to .descriptive and .multivariate to .regression
2) Add a (writable) boolean
burton 2004/10/03 17:59:47
Modified:feedparser/src/java/org/apache/commons/feedparser
AtomFeedParser.java
feedparser/src/java/org/apache/commons/feedparser/impl
DebugFeedParserListener.java
Hi Phil,
As I do not have any CVS set up, so I do it this way:
4) Add the following new methods to both RealMatrix and BigMatrix
interfaces:
RealMatrix getSubMatrix (int startRow, int endRow, int startColumn,
int endColumn)
RealMatrix getSubMatrix (int[] rows, int[] columns)
RealMatrix
O, the code I gave in the bug-report contains a bug, the code I just
send has been tested in actuall applications.
Cheers,
Kim
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Kim van der Linde wrote:
O, the code I gave in the bug-report contains a bug, the code I just
send has been tested in actuall applications.
Thanks!
Test cases would be most appreciated ;-)
Phil
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
dgraham 2004/10/03 20:54:46
Modified:validator/src/test/org/apache/commons/validator
ValidatorTestSuite.java
validator/xdocs changes.xml
validator project.xml
Added: validator/src/share/org/apache/commons/validator
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31489.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
dion2004/10/03 22:03:33
Modified:jexl/xdocs index.xml
Log:
Bugzilla 31518
Revision ChangesPath
1.14 +2 -2 jakarta-commons/jexl/xdocs/index.xml
Index: index.xml
===
RCS file:
How do I run the tests for components in jelly-tags and force Maven to use
my build of Jelly, not the downloaded snapshot?
thx,
Hans
Pavel,
It does seem a little unusual and does appear likely to be a problem on
the server side. 'Connection reset' error usually occurs in the
following two cases:
(1) the server drops the connection on the unsuspecting HttpClient while
it is still busy transmitting the request. The most common
38 matches
Mail list logo
