[CLI] Status

2004-12-22 Thread David Morris
I used the COMMONS CLI package for a couple of recent projects and I ran into some serious problems and submitted some patches. Next, I tried version 2, which appears to be a ground up rewrite. It worked a lot better after a couple of minor tweaks and a patch. I don't see much activity lately in CV

Re: AW: AW: AW: [proposal] avoiding jar version nightmares

2004-12-22 Thread Oliver Zeigermann
Hihi, good point, I actually never have. What phenomena are to be expected? Just like you have compiled something with say 1.4 and let it run on a 1.3 platform? Anyway, I was thinking of this with respect to class loading issues... Oliver On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 13:37:44 +1300, Sharples, Colin <[E

[jira] Commented: (JELLY-85) TagScript doesn't clear its cached tags after run()

2004-12-22 Thread Paul Libbrecht (JIRA)
[ http://nagoya.apache.org/jira/browse/JELLY-85?page=comments#action_56996 ] Paul Libbrecht commented on JELLY-85: - I think this is the right issue to post three possible approaches towards the tag-caching problem which was solved incompletely by

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27633] - [beanutils] IllegalArgumentException in BeanUtils.copyProperties when property types don't match

2004-12-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32799] - [configuration] HierarchicalXMLConfiguration: Phantom-Keys with ...[@xml:base] when using nested XML-Files

2004-12-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: [Vote Results] Moving commons-sql to db.apache.org (repost)

2004-12-22 Thread Tim O'Brien
> > * Ask Infrastructure for creation of a project space (SVN space, mailing > > lists, etc.) in db.apache.org, including giving commit rights to all > > db.apache.org committers (if that is possible) > > > > * Migrate the repository to the new location (e.g. cvs2svn etc.) - > > perhaps infrastruc

Re: [OT][logging] politics [WAS Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0?]

2004-12-22 Thread Richard Sitze
Ceki Gülcü <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 12/22/2004 04:53:49 AM: > JCL shows indications of mission creep. I believe this to be a factual > observation independent of ASF representation. Just to help clarify your concern, would you please define "mission creep". > >(conversely, if you do thin

Re: [Vote Results] Moving commons-sql to db.apache.org (repost)

2004-12-22 Thread Henri Yandell
On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 16:20:43 +0100, Thomas Dudziak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Define a name for the new db.apache.org project (see remark 1). I'd > like to name it along the lines DbUtils (which is already taken by > commons-dbutils, btw), e.g. DbSetupUtils or likewise. Suggestions are > welco

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32801] - provide maps with direct indexed access to the entries

2004-12-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32801] - provide maps with direct indexed access to the entries

2004-12-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32801] New: - provide maps with direct indexed access to the entries

2004-12-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32799] - [configuration] HierarchicalXMLConfiguration: Phantom-Keys with ...[@xml:base] when using nested XML-Files

2004-12-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32785] - FileItem implements Serializable incorrectly

2004-12-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32799] - [configuration] HierarchicalXMLConfiguration: Phantom-Keys with ...[@xml:base] when using nested XML-Files

2004-12-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32799] - [configuration] HierarchicalXMLConfiguration: Phantom-Keys with ...[@xml:base] when using nested XML-Files

2004-12-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32799] - [configuration] HierarchicalXMLConfiguration: Phantom-Keys with ...[@xml:base] when using nested XML-Files

2004-12-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32799] - [configuration] HierarchicalXMLConfiguration: Phantom-Keys with ...[@xml:base] when using nested XML-Files

2004-12-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

[Vote Results] Moving commons-sql to db.apache.org (repost)

2004-12-22 Thread Thomas Dudziak
Hi all, two weeks ago I started a vote about moving commons-sql from jakarta commons to db. Here are the results: +1: 9 votes +/-0 : 0 votes -1: 0 votes with two remarks: * commons-sql should not be moved into db-commons but rather be its own project with a non-"commons" name (see below

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32799] - [configuration] HierarchicalXMLConfiguration: Phantom-Keys with ...[@xml:base] when using nested XML-Files

2004-12-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32799] New: - [configuration] HierarchicalXMLConfiguration: Phantom-Keys with ...[@xml:base] when using nested XML-Files

2004-12-22 Thread bugzilla
ur for HierarchicalXMLConfiguration in http://cvs.apache.org/builds/jakarta-commons/nightly/commons-configuration/commons-configuration-src-20041222.zip if I use nested XML-Configuration-Files. I tried the following: - I have a XML-Configuration file super.xml. Within this file, I define an !ENTITY point

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32797] - [configuration] HierarchicalXMLConfiguration.setProperty() deletes subelements

2004-12-22 Thread bugzilla
ommons-configuration-src-20041222.zip I hope to see this fix in the next official release. Thanks a lot. Best regards, Christian Kemmer -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32240] - [configuration] XMLConfiguration.save() does not keep element hierarchy

2004-12-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32797] - [configuration] HierarchicalXMLConfiguration.setProperty() deletes subelements

2004-12-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32797] New: - [configuration] HierarchicalXMLConfiguration.setProperty() deletes subelements

2004-12-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31429] - [configuration] Messed file on saving an XMLConfiguration

2004-12-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32785] - FileItem implements Serializable incorrectly

2004-12-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [OT][logging] politics [WAS Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0?]

2004-12-22 Thread Ceki Gülcü
At 11:56 PM 12/21/2004, robert burrell donkin wrote: FWIW AFAIK the committers who feel victimized are outside jakarta. IMHO committers who are vocally critical of the ASF (as an organization) are something about which the membership should be concerned. some of them simply have an obvious axe t

cvs commit: jakarta-commons/daemon/src/native/nt/procrun/apps/srvbatch/example example.c example.vcproj exservice.bat

2004-12-22 Thread mturk
mturk 2004/12/22 02:18:48 Added: daemon/src/native/nt/procrun/apps/srvbatch MSG1.bin srvbatch.c srvbatch.rc srvbatch.sln srvbatch.vcproj daemon/src/native/nt/procrun/apps/srvbatch/example example.c example.vcproj exse

cvs commit: jakarta-commons/daemon/src/native/nt/procrun/apps/srvbatch/example - New directory

2004-12-22 Thread mturk
mturk 2004/12/22 02:16:21 jakarta-commons/daemon/src/native/nt/procrun/apps/srvbatch/example - New directory - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

cvs commit: jakarta-commons/daemon/src/native/nt/procrun/apps/srvbatch - New directory

2004-12-22 Thread mturk
mturk 2004/12/22 02:16:14 jakarta-commons/daemon/src/native/nt/procrun/apps/srvbatch - New directory - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]