DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33744] - [collections] Should make collection generic like Java5 generic containers

2005-02-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33744. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33676] - [servlet] SessionUtils and new methods for RequestUtils

2005-02-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33676. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

[GUMP@brutus]: Project commons-jelly-tags-xml (in module commons-jelly) failed

2005-02-28 Thread commons-jelly-tags-xml development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-xml has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[GUMP@brutus]: Project commons-jelly-tags-ant (in module commons-jelly) failed

2005-02-28 Thread commons-jelly-tags-ant development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-ant has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[PATCH][commons-daemonSetting the process name

2005-02-28 Thread Derek Lohnes
I'm using the JSVC to run multiple java processes. I would like to be able to tell them apart when viewing the process list. Currently they all display as jsvc-exec. The patch contains a new command line argument called procname. If procname is passed as an argument to jsvc it is as the

[digester] Patches to xmlrules : NodeCreateRule addon + namespace prefix support

2005-02-28 Thread Kristian Mandrup
Added PREFIX namespace support for NodeCreateRule: Can now parse a XML Schema correctly Tested (see Junit TestCase below). Works fine! +++ public class NodeCreateRule extends Rule { private class NodeBuilder extends DefaultHandler { +++ public void startElement(String

Re: [VOTE][configuration]Release 1.1

2005-02-28 Thread Oliver Heger
Okay, I would like to get out the release as soon as possible, too. Emmanuel, did you make some progress at the reloading stuff? Is there something I can do to help you? Oliver Eric Pugh wrote: You didn't break fulcrum.. Fulcrum Configuration is built by Gump against the CVS head, so the API

Re: [VOTE][configuration]Release 1.1

2005-02-28 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Oliver Heger wrote: Okay, I would like to get out the release as soon as possible, too. Emmanuel, did you make some progress at the reloading stuff? Is there something I can do to help you? Oliver I haven't had a chance to test it yet, I should have some time this week. Emmanuel Bourg

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33167] - [dbcp] Individual connection close method

2005-02-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33167. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33775] New: - dist dir has out-of-date files

2005-02-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33775. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33744] - [collections] Should make collection generic like Java5 generic containers

2005-02-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33744. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33775] - [attributes] dist dir has out-of-date files

2005-02-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33775. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: [VOTE][configuration]Release 1.1

2005-02-28 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Emmanuel Bourg wrote: I haven't had a chance to test it yet, I should have some time this week. Ok I checked again my application with the latest nightly build and it worked fine. I don't know what happened the last time I updated my commons configuration jar... I'm +1 for a 1.1-rc2 release

Re: [VOTE][configuration]Release 1.1

2005-02-28 Thread Oliver Heger
Strange! Okay, I would like to have a look at bug 33723 and maybe add a unit test that checks for absolute path names (to be sure). 33691 is open, too, but I think this has been more or less solved in the meantime. Here we could only modify the constructor of SubsetConfiguration that does not

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33331] - [betwixt] Custom Object-String Conversion in .betwixt file

2005-02-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

commons lang: Comparisons with null support

2005-02-28 Thread Sualeh Fatehi
I have not done an extensive search of the mailing list archives, but I was wondering if something like the following comparison functions with support for null values may be useful in commons lang StringUtils (and also DateUtils and NumberUtils): public static int compare(String left, String

Re: [VOTE] [logging] promote RC1 to alpha status

2005-02-28 Thread Richard Sitze
+1 *** Richard A. Sitze IBM WebSphere WebServices Development robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 02/26/2005 01:41:05 PM: the release candidate has been available for a while now and i am not aware of any problems with it. the next stage

Re: [VOTE][configuration]Release 1.1

2005-02-28 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Oliver Heger wrote: Strange! Okay, I would like to have a look at bug 33723 and maybe add a unit test that checks for absolute path names (to be sure). 33691 is open, too, but I think this has been more or less solved in the meantime. Here we could only modify the constructor of

Re: [lang] commons lang: Comparisons with null support

2005-02-28 Thread Stephen Colebourne
You may find NullComparator in [collections] useful. Stephen - Original Message - From: Sualeh Fatehi [EMAIL PROTECTED] I have not done an extensive search of the mailing list archives, but I was wondering if something like the following comparison functions with support for null values

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33377] - [jxpath] asPath() returns a path to the last sibling

2005-02-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33377. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33780] - [betwixt] SAX Attribute Problem: qName differ from localName

2005-02-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33780. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

[betwixt] Bug in attribute output to SAX events. local name differs from qualified name

2005-02-28 Thread Christoph Gaffga
hi, found some strange behavior with BetwixtTransfomer in cocoon that comes from a problem of the SAX output of betwixt, as I think. The attributes of a start element SAX event local names that differ from there qualified names for attributes without namespace applied. I wrote a small testcase

Re: [digester] Patches to xmlrules : NodeCreateRule addon + namespace prefix support

2005-02-28 Thread Simon Kitching
Hi Kristian, On Mon, 2005-02-28 at 17:43 +0100, Kristian Mandrup wrote: Added PREFIX namespace support for NodeCreateRule: Can now parse a XML Schema correctly Tested (see Junit TestCase below). Works fine! [snip] if ((localName == null) || (localName.length() == 0)) {

Re: [digester] Patches to xmlrules : NodeCreateRule addon + namespace prefix support

2005-02-28 Thread Simon Kitching
On Tue, 2005-03-01 at 14:15 +1300, Simon Kitching wrote: Hi Kristian, On Mon, 2005-02-28 at 17:43 +0100, Kristian Mandrup wrote: Added PREFIX namespace support for NodeCreateRule: Can now parse a XML Schema correctly Tested (see Junit TestCase below). Works fine! [snip]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33780] - [betwixt] SAX Attribute Problem: qName differ from localName

2005-02-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33780. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: [dbutils]Sending large set of numbers

2005-02-28 Thread Norris Shelton
I had the query in a properties file. The numbers for the set were the result of another query. It was a string named sids in the form of a CSV. ,222,333,444,,666.,888,999 I think this was the problem. I was trying to call it like: list = (List) queryRunner.query(query, sids,

[FeedParser] Patch: Maven build changes

2005-02-28 Thread Nick Lothian
The patch below modifies the FeedParser Maven build so it can be used to compile the code. This should apply against http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jakarta/commons/proper/feedparser/trunk/ (which I presume is the correct site - the website says

RE: [VOTE][configuration]Release 1.1

2005-02-28 Thread Eric Pugh
I'll take a loo at the latest as well, I need to update some dependencies anyway for Turbine! -Original Message- From: Oliver Heger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 28, 2005 12:09 PM To: Jakarta Commons Developers List Subject: Re: [VOTE][configuration]Release 1.1

[VOTE] Release commons email 1.0

2005-02-28 Thread Eric Pugh
Hi all, The commons-email RC3 release has been available for a couple days, and has isn't fundamentally changed from the RC2 release that has been out for a couple months. I'd like to move to releasing the code here: http://www.apache.org/~epugh/email/distributions/ as commons-email-1.0.