Modified:
jakarta/commons/proper/lang/trunk/src/test/org/apache/commons/lang/enums/ValuedEnumTest.java
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs/jakarta/commons/proper/lang/trunk/src/test/org/apache/commons/lang/enums/ValuedEnumTest.java?view=diffr1=161243r2=161244
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34436.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20813.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34446.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hmm..you're quite right. The problem is not getContextClassLoader, but
there *is* a problem with AccessController.
I've checked the svn/cvs history, and the AccessController stuff was
added by Richard Sitze in r138923 on 2002-10-18. Presumably that was the
date at which JCL no longer worked on
Hi,
does someone work on the IniFile support? If not, I could do...
...just drop me a line.
Cheers,
Oliver
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ooops,
I thought I'd replied to the commons dev list, but Laurent's original
e-mail had an explicit reply-to address set, so it went straight back to
him instead. I'm posting this back to the commons-dev list for the sake
of completeness.
Chris
Hi Laurent,
After an initial flurry of activity
Oliver Siegmar wrote on Thursday, April 14, 2005 8:39 AM:
Hi,
does someone work on the IniFile support? If not, I could do...
You might utilize http://www.ubique.ch/code/inieditor/. Lib comes with BSD
style license and is very small and easy. You should use only the ctors with
the streams
Hi Brett,
Brett Porter wrote:
There are a few suspect dependencies in the POM from the 1.1 release:
- - resources:resources:1.0 doesn't exist - how does Maven build with this?
This is a fake dependency for the unit tests loading a configuration
from a JAR in the classpath. The file resources.jar
Hi Oliver, thank you for offering your help. I already started working
on this. I didn't want to commit it until 1.1 was released, I'll add it
to SVN as soon as I fix a few remaining issues.
Emmanuel Bourg
Oliver Siegmar wrote:
Hi,
does someone work on the IniFile support? If not, I could do...
Thank you for the patch Oliver, could you append it to Bug 33553 please
? (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33553). This is the
bug related to caching the DatabaseConfiguration properties.
Emmanuel Bourg
Oliver Siegmar wrote:
Hi folks,
the attachted (svn-)patch adds a preload
Hi Emmanuel,
On Thursday 14 April 2005 09:51, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Hi Oliver, thank you for offering your help. I already started working
on this. I didn't want to commit it until 1.1 was released, I'll add it
to SVN as soon as I fix a few remaining issues.
Does your implementation has
Oliver Siegmar wrote:
Does your implementation has default (a.k.a. global, a.k.a. common) section
support?
What do you mean by default section exactly ? Currently my
implementation does the following:
- config.addProperty(foo.bar.xyz, 123) creates a [foo] section with
a bar.xyz property:
In the maven 2 repository the pom of commons-logging doesn't exist. I
found one in commons-logging/commons-logging-api/1.0.4/ but regarding to
the maven 1 definition of a commons-logging dependency, it should be in
commons-logging/commons-logging/1.0.4 as it is the common declaration and
will
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33553.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Nicholas, is this a request to move something, a note to
commons-logging developers or just something you needed to get off
your chest?
On 4/14/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the maven 2 repository the pom of commons-logging doesn't exist. I
found one in
On Thursday 14 April 2005 10:55, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Oliver Siegmar wrote:
Does your implementation has default (a.k.a. global, a.k.a. common)
section support?
What do you mean by default section exactly ? Currently my
implementation does the following:
Many application ini files have
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I think he misunderstood my post on Maven Users. I said I was
investigating this, and that I had posted to commons-dev. Robert already
fixed the problem, I need to figure out why it hasn't found its way
there yet...
Cheers,
Brett
Dion Gillard wrote:
Sorry I wasn't clear.
It is a request to move
http://www.ibiblio.org/maven2/commons-logging/commons-logging-api/1.0.4/commons-logging-api-1.0.4.pom
to
http://www.ibiblio.org/maven2/commons-logging/commons-logging/1.0.4/commons-logging-1.0.4.pom.
Or one the server in sync with
Oliver Siegmar wrote on Thursday, April 14, 2005 11:12 AM:
On Thursday 14 April 2005 10:55, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Oliver Siegmar wrote:
Does your implementation has default (a.k.a. global, a.k.a. common)
section support?
What do you mean by default section exactly ? Currently my
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-xml has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
Oliver Siegmar wrote:
Many application ini files have some kind of default-section. Consider the
following ini-file:
[default]
foo = 30
val = 50
[section1]
foo = 10
Ok I see your point. There was a support for default values in
On Thursday 14 April 2005 11:32, Jörg Schaible wrote:
Many application ini files have some kind of default-section.
Consider the following ini-file:
[snip]
well, such a behaviour would be different from all other configuration
implemnetations and I don't think it is worth the hassle. You
On Thursday 14 April 2005 11:42, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Ok I see your point. There was a support for default values in
PropertiesConfiguration some time ago but we removed it in favor of
CompositeConfiguration. For consistency I think we will apply the same
reasoning for INIConfiguration, that
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34448.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34448.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: ebourg
Date: Thu Apr 14 05:11:33 2005
New Revision: 161261
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=revrev=161261
Log:
Updated the project descriptor to use the commons-logging-api artifact instead
of commons-logging and the groupId/artifactId tags instead of id (suggested by
Brett
Author: ebourg
Date: Thu Apr 14 05:21:33 2005
New Revision: 161262
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=revrev=161262
Log:
Added the Maven2 property scopetest/scope on the test dependencies
Modified:
jakarta/commons/proper/configuration/trunk/project.xml
Modified:
FYI, I've committed copyright changes for 2005.
Gary
-Original Message-
From: Henri Yandell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, April 10, 2005 5:54 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: [lang] VOTE 2.1 release
Proposing a vote to go ahead and release Commons Lang 2.1.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34362.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34362.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: olegk
Date: Thu Apr 14 11:03:51 2005
New Revision: 161330
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=revrev=161330
Log:
Test coverage for EntityEnclosingMethod
Contributed by Oleg Kalnichevski
Added:
Author: olegk
Date: Thu Apr 14 11:21:03 2005
New Revision: 161333
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=revrev=161333
Log:
HTTP POST test cases ported to the SimpleHTTPServer based testing tramework
Contributed by Oleg Kalnichevski
Added:
Author: olegk
Date: Thu Apr 14 11:23:30 2005
New Revision: 161334
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=revrev=161334
Log:
HTTP POST test cases ported to the SimpleHTTPServer based testing tramework
Contributed by Oleg Kalnichevski
Added:
Author: ggregory
Date: Thu Apr 14 11:39:07 2005
New Revision: 161335
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=revrev=161335
Log:
[codec] Add methods for SHA-256, SHA-384, and SHA-512 to DigestUtils.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34157.
Modified:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34372.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34457.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34457.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34457.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34457.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Looks good. +1
I'd be glad to do the release if someone wouldn't mind walking me through it
since I've never done one.
On 4/10/05, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Proposing a vote to go ahead and release Commons Lang 2.1.
The release will pretty much match the release-candidate
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34457.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
42 matches
Mail list logo
