I disagree, README is just clutter and should be removed.
We send out announcements on the mailing list and if people miss that
they can look at the website.
The complete list of components if on the commons homepage so with one
click you have a full overview.
-- Dirk
Rory Winston wrote:
Good
I think I agree with this. I believe it is better to remove the entire
sandbox directory, so that people notice it has moved (the website says
where) and can change the SVN repository in use (that can be done; can't it?).
At 2005-05-13 10:10, you wrote:
I disagree, README is just clutter and
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34902.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi all,
seems as if quite a few of the commons components need an update of
their web presence because their source repository link (project info
- source repository) still refers to CVS instead of SVN, for instance
digester, betwixt, bean-utils.
regards,
Tom
Hi,
I've problems with commons-daemon, first I wanted to browse dev
mailing list archives, but current link is dead
(http://mail-archives.apache.org/eyebrowse/[EMAIL PROTECTED])
so thats why I wrote here directly.
I'm trying to run jsvc on linux as a non-root user but I've a lot of
issues with
I have just started using Jakarta Chains to refactor and evolve an existing
project. I've had thoughts around this for a long time, and finally got
around to it. When actually working with this API/pattern, a few questions
come to mind, mostly related to the dependencies between different
Hi everyone,
Had this vote in mind for a long time, but got districted with other
parts of my life.
I call on making Stefan a commons committer (this vote is way overdue,
probably due to that everyone probably thinks he is a already committer)
I'll skip the reasons why, since if you are allowed
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34289.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: jfclere
Date: Fri May 13 06:17:02 2005
New Revision: 170016
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=170016view=rev
Log:
Add explaination about how to build the manpage.
Added:
jakarta/commons/proper/daemon/trunk/src/native/unix/man/README
At 2:53 PM +0200 5/13/05, Martin van den Bemt wrote:
Hi everyone,
Had this vote in mind for a long time, but got districted with other
parts of my life.
I call on making Stefan a commons committer (this vote is way
overdue, probably due to that everyone probably thinks he is a
already
After long time in the sandbox I would like to promote
commons-vfs to commons proper.
There are many user requests to enter a release cycle and
there is consent that VFS is stable enough to offer it.
(0) Rationale
commons-vfs allows a single api to access many different
filesystem, A plugin system
+1
Phil
On 5/13/05, Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi everyone,
Had this vote in mind for a long time, but got districted with other
parts of my life.
I call on making Stefan a commons committer (this vote is way overdue,
probably due to that everyone probably thinks he is a
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34483.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
obviously non-committing, but I'm willing to help out
where needed.
- Filip
Vote to promote the vfs package from Sandbox to Commons proper
[x] +1 I am in favor of this action and will help
[ ] +0 I am in favor of this action but cannot help
[ ] -0 I am not in favor of this action
[ ] -1 I
+1
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1
Oliver
On 5/13/05, Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi everyone,
Had this vote in mind for a long time, but got districted with other
parts of my life.
I call on making Stefan a commons committer (this vote is way overdue,
probably due to that everyone probably thinks he is
I have a case in my application where I want to map one key to multiple
values. However, I don't want the values to be stored as a List. I would
rather have MultiHashMap store the values in a Set of some kind (HashSet
maybe). It would be nice if I could tell MultiHashMap what kind of
collection
+1
Jakarta Commons Developers List commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org wrote:
Hi everyone,
Had this vote in mind for a long time, but got districted with other
parts of my life.
I call on making Stefan a commons committer (this vote is way overdue,
probably due to that everyone probably
+1
Jakarta Commons Developers List commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org wrote:
Hi everyone,
Had this vote in mind for a long time, but got districted with other
parts of my life.
I call on making Stefan a commons committer (this vote is way overdue,
probably due to that everyone probably
+1
Jakarta Commons Developers List commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org wrote:
Hi everyone,
Had this vote in mind for a long time, but got districted with other
parts of my life.
I call on making Stefan a commons committer (this vote is way overdue,
probably due to that everyone probably
+1
Jakarta Commons Developers List commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org wrote:
Hi everyone,
Had this vote in mind for a long time, but got districted with other
parts of my life.
I call on making Stefan a commons committer (this vote is way overdue,
probably due to that everyone probably
+1
On 5/13/05, Rory Winston [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
Jakarta Commons Developers List commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org wrote:
Hi everyone,
Had this vote in mind for a long time, but got districted with other
parts of my life.
I call on making Stefan a commons committer (this
Upon further thought, why do we even have a class like MultiHashMap?
Couldn't we write a generic MultiMap implementation that wraps another map
and provides the multiple functionality?
public class MapUtils
{
...
public static MultiMap multiMap( Map implementation );
public static MultiMap
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Joe Germuska writes:
overdue, probably due to that everyone probably thinks he is a
already committer)
That's what I thought!
Same here.
+1
daniel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Martin van den Bemt wrote:
[X ] +1 Let him commit
[ ] 0
[ ] -1 Maybe not, because..
---
Mario
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1
-Original Message-
From: Martin van den Bemt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 13, 2005 8:54 AM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: [VOTE] Stefan Bodewig as commons proper committer
Hi everyone,
Had this vote in mind for a long time, but got districted with other
Author: jmitchell
Date: Fri May 13 11:32:13 2005
New Revision: 170067
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=170067view=rev
Log:
BasicMessage is at 100% test coverage
Modified:
jakarta/commons/proper/resources/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/resources/Messages.java
On Fri, 13 May 2005, Martin van den Bemt wrote:
[X] +1 Let him commit
[ ] 0
[ ] -1 Maybe not, because..
--
Martin Cooper
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have the highest respect for Stefan. I vote +1 without even knowing
the reason why it comes up. He will be a great asset.
Original Message
Subject: [VOTE] Stefan Bodewig as commons proper committer
From: Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, May 13, 2005 5:53
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34902.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34902.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34902.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34902.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34902.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On Fri, 2005-05-13 at 16:45 +0200, Mario Ivankovits wrote:
Vote to promote the vfs package from Sandbox to Commons proper
+1
Vote to release Commons VFS 1.0:
No opinion.
Regards,
Simon
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
On Thu, 2005-05-12 at 09:44 +0200, Mattias J wrote:
SimonKitching wrote:
+ Any Jakarta committer (not just commons committers) has the right ask
for karma (commit access) and have it granted. The right place to ask is
on the commons-dev mailing list.
+ Commit access to the sandbox is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martin van den Bemt wrote:
[X] +1 Let him commit
[ ] 0
[ ] -1 Maybe not, because..
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
A decorator like this is definitely the preferred solution. Its been
suggested before, but no one has yet had the itch to code it ;-)
Stephen
James Carman wrote:
Upon further thought, why do we even have a class like MultiHashMap?
Couldn't we write a generic MultiMap implementation that wraps
Vote to promote the vfs package from Sandbox to Commons proper
[X] +1 I am in favor of this action and will help
[ ] +0 I am in favor of this action but cannot help
[ ] -0 I am not in favor of this action
[ ] -1 I am opposed to this action and here is why:
Vote to release Commons VFS 1.0:
[ ] +1 I
[X] +1 Let him commit
[ ] 0
[ ] -1 Maybe not, because..
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
40 matches
Mail list logo
