DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33841.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: skitching
Date: Wed Jun 8 23:44:57 2005
New Revision: 189720
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=189720view=rev
Log:
Minor javadoc improvement only.
Modified:
jakarta/commons/proper/beanutils/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/beanutils/locale/BaseLocaleConverter.java
Modified:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33840.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32691.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
It's somewhat unpractical to distribute a binary that's without
taglibs, I believe.
As we wish to release xml and ant taglibs at the same time, why not
include both in the binary as well ? This is certainly partial but
would be more practical I believe.
Maven users don't download jelly, they
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33698.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: skitching
Date: Thu Jun 9 01:05:39 2005
New Revision: 189729
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=189729view=rev
Log:
Enhanced javadoc.
Modified:
jakarta/commons/proper/beanutils/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/beanutils/converters/StringConverter.java
Modified:
Author: skitching
Date: Thu Jun 9 01:07:21 2005
New Revision: 189730
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=189730view=rev
Log:
Improved javadoc only.
Modified:
jakarta/commons/proper/beanutils/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/beanutils/converters/StringArrayConverter.java
Modified:
On Wed, 08 Jun 2005, Niklas Gustavsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I very much like the support for this in Ant and have extracted that
code and removed all Ant specifics for some of my other projects. I
would be happy to contribute and maintain this code should you be
interested.
+1 sounds
Didn't someone submit a CVS implementation to [codec] a while back? It was
sitting in a Bugzilla ticket last time I checked.
Kevin Gessner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/8/05, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
=20
Another question is where the code should go. [lang] and [io]
Didn't someone submit a CVS implementation to [codec] a while back? It was
sitting in a Bugzilla ticket last time I checked.
Kevin Gessner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/8/05, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
=20
Another question is where the code should go. [lang] and [io]
I must say that I agree with Henri that this merits its own component.
IMO it doesn't fit into [lang] and would look strange within [io] or
[codec]. CSV is a topic that comes up every now and then and if this
could be solved once and for all then a separate component would be
justified if only for
Ok ...thanks for the pointers - will see what I can do
Feel free to contact me if there is something else I can help with.
Thanks, mate
Michael came up with a workaround. Instead of
using a ByteArrayOutputStream we use a temp
file and a FileOutputStream. Of course is not
really that great
Hi Torsten!
Michael came up with a workaround. Instead of
using a ByteArrayOutputStream we use a temp
file and a FileOutputStream.
Nice idea!
He is currently looking into a Piped version.
Or what do you think how should we solve this?
I think a Piped version is the correct solution.
But
I'm also +1 to a separate [csv] component for the reasons already conveyed.
On 6/9/05, Jeremias Maerki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I must say that I agree with Henri that this merits its own component.
IMO it doesn't fit into [lang] and would look strange within [io] or
[codec]. CSV is a topic
So as suggested I am trying webdav now for
directory traversal ...but I've run into
problems there as well.
I've been debugging a bit. While the file
protocol works like charm using webdav I
get a imaginary type for test which results
in a not existing and a straight abort of
the traversal.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35285.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi!
So as suggested I am trying webdav now for
directory traversal ...but I've run into
problems there as well.
I've been debugging a bit. While the file
protocol works like charm using webdav I
get a imaginary type for test which results
in a not existing and a straight abort of
the traversal.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35285.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Its hard to tell something without having access to the webdav server.
Sure ...but I can arrange that :)
I've just set it up on my laptop
If possible try to set a breakpoint in WebdavFileObject.setDavResource
and see what happens:
Yes
There are two interesting places:
1) around line 125:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35260.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Torsten Curdt wrote:
No ...there was no GET ...but should
there really be a GET on a directory?
Good question, I dont know for sure, but for those webdav server I seen
so far this was the case.
Lets google a little bit to find some informations.
Whats the list of your allowed methods?
---
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33461.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Steven Caswell wrote:
I'm also +1 to a separate [csv] component for the reasons already conveyed.
also think it's worth a separate component
cheers
--
Torsten
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
No ...there was no GET ...but should
there really be a GET on a directory?
Good question, I dont know for sure, but for those webdav server I seen
so far this was the case.
Hm... it's mod_dav on the default OSX apache httpd
Lets google a little bit to find some informations.
Hm...
Torsten Curdt wrote:
Whats the list of your allowed methods?
OPTIONS, MKCOL, PUT, LOCK
Hmmm
MKCOL, OPTIONS, PUT is what I get if I try to access the non existent
file at
webdav://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jakarta/commons/proper/vfs/trunk/abcd
Maybe there is a problem with your
Whats the list of your allowed methods?
OPTIONS, MKCOL, PUT, LOCK
Hmmm
MKCOL, OPTIONS, PUT is what I get if I try to access the non existent
Bummer! That's what it was ...I had the Sites directory
in the URI as well. So basically this means that the root
dir was not found.
PS: shall we post the patch to bugzilla?
You mean the Piped version - sure, please ;-)
Well... :)
But please post the temp-file workaround too, with low-priority and as
enhancement - will see what the future brings.
Ok, workaround is filed. Michael is looking
into piped version as
The real question is the various dependencies that go along with each taglib.
If you bundle:
xml taglib, to use it you need xalan 2.3.1.
ant taglib, to use it you need ant, ant-launcher and ant-junit 1.6.2
etc...
And I believe there are taglibs whose dependencies we can't
distribute, e.g. the
I believe what's below is a valuable compromise...
Almost a minimalistic one but otherwise the archive would be almost
10Mb fat...
paul
Le 9 juin 05, à 15:07, Dion Gillard a écrit :
What's a valuable compromise?
On 6/9/05, Paul Libbrecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
bean, define, dynabean,
Torsten Curdt wrote:
So basically this means that the root
dir was not found.
May I suggest to throw an exception if the root does not
exist? I think a FileNotFound exception would be appropriate.
VFS's createFolder() method automatically create the directory with all
its parents if they do
Mario Ivankovits wrote:
Torsten Curdt wrote:
So basically this means that the root
dir was not found.
May I suggest to throw an exception if the root does not
exist? I think a FileNotFound exception would be appropriate.
VFS's createFolder() method automatically create the directory
Torsten Curdt wrote:
May I suggest to throw an exception if the root does not
exist? I think a FileNotFound exception would be appropriate.
for VFS its not possible to throw a FileNotFoundException. :-(
Huh? Don't understand how that is related.
AFAIU in findFiles() in
Stefan and Brett,
great that you like the proposal! I'll read up on plexus-utils and will
also take a look at Peters work with Ant2.
Now, given that you are both busy and I'm not an Apache commiter, how do
you propose we move forward on this? I'm aware of the process for
contributing
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34959.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I am attempting to build commons chain from source. I have all the
dependencies except portlet figured out. I looked in the project.xml
file and found pluto as the portlet implementation. I cannot however
find the portlet api. Sun points to Pluto as the RI for portlet, but
I can't find the
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35126.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35294.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35294.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35294.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34819.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Both the Maven and Ant builds should download the dependencies
automatically. Is that not working for you?
--
Martin Cooper
On 6/9/05, Michael Rasmussen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am attempting to build commons chain from source. I have all the
dependencies except portlet figured out. I
On Wed, 2005-06-08 at 15:08 +1200, Simon Kitching wrote:
On Mon, 2005-06-06 at 22:35 +0100, robert burrell donkin wrote:
The first public release candidate (RC3) for Betwixt 0.6.1 is now
available for download:
http://people.apache.org/~rdonkin/commons-betwixt/. Please check and
report
I just grabbed it from iBiblio after taking a look at the ant build
file. However I am still not sure who produces the portlet-api.jar.
Where is it built? Sun? Pluto?
Michael
On 6/9/05, Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Both the Maven and Ant builds should download the dependencies
On Wed, 2005-06-08 at 14:43 +0200, Thomas Dudziak wrote:
On 6/6/05, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The first public release candidate (RC3) for Betwixt 0.6.1 is now
available for download:
http://people.apache.org/~rdonkin/commons-betwixt/. Please check and
report any
On 6/9/05, Michael Rasmussen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just grabbed it from iBiblio after taking a look at the ant build
file. However I am still not sure who produces the portlet-api.jar.
Where is it built? Sun? Pluto?
Pluto, I believe.
--
Martin Cooper
Michael
On 6/9/05, Martin
On Thu, 2005-06-09 at 10:41 +1200, Simon Kitching wrote:
On Wed, 2005-06-08 at 22:21 +0100, robert burrell donkin wrote:
===
Maven reports:
I would suggest disabling this report. Firstly, a log of the last 30
days isn't of much use. And secondly, due to the import into SVN of
Author: rdonkin
Date: Thu Jun 9 13:01:40 2005
New Revision: 189805
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=189805view=rev
Log:
Commented out reports which are now inaccurate (due to subversion conversion).
Thanks to Simon Kitching.
Modified:
I'm planning to cut the 2.1 release this weekend if there aren't any -1s
before then, and I've never done one of these, so I'm wondering if there is
any doc anywhere I can look at for steps/guidelines/etc. Failing that, is
there someone who would be so kind as to give me the pointers I need to
On Thu, 2005-06-09 at 10:51 +1200, Simon Kitching wrote:
On Wed, 2005-06-08 at 23:22 +0100, robert burrell donkin wrote:
=== other
The src distro builds fine with Java1.5 on Linux (debian 3.1).
Unfortunately, there are ?? unit test failures when using java
the latest betwixt code contains a number of (relatively minor) semantic
incompatibilities with the last release as well as quite a number of new
features. after recent discussions, i think it best to release the code
as 1.7 rather than 1.6.1. therefore i propose that the plan will remain
the same
Author: rdonkin
Date: Thu Jun 9 13:33:27 2005
New Revision: 189812
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=189812view=rev
Log:
Updated README
Modified:
jakarta/commons/proper/betwixt/branches/RELEASE_0_6_1_BRANCH/README.txt
Modified:
On Wed, 2005-06-08 at 08:19 +0200, Mario Ivankovits wrote:
Hi!
I would like to know how to deal with versions of dependend libraries.
Naturally VFS do have a bunch of dependencies, some of them are actively
developed.
As far as I know a non-backward compatible change in the public api
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35294.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35285.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35258.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35278.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35263.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35207.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
--- Mario Ivankovits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Torsten!
Michael came up with a workaround. Instead of
using a ByteArrayOutputStream we use a temp
file and a FileOutputStream.
Nice idea!
He is currently looking into a Piped version.
Or what do you think how should we solve this?
I
On Thu, 2005-06-09 at 21:24 +0100, robert burrell donkin wrote:
the latest betwixt code contains a number of (relatively minor) semantic
incompatibilities with the last release as well as quite a number of new
features. after recent discussions, i think it best to release the code
as 1.7
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35126.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On Thu, 2005-06-09 at 16:03 -0400, Steven Caswell wrote:
I'm planning to cut the 2.1 release this weekend if there aren't any -1s
before then, and I've never done one of these, so I'm wondering if there is
any doc anywhere I can look at for steps/guidelines/etc. Failing that, is
there
Hi,
I attach a patch that allows to configure the SMTP authentication in the
property file.
I've added two new properties:
MAIL_SMTP_USER = mail.smtp.user;
MAIL_SMTP_PWD = mail.smtp.pwd;
This allows software thought to work without SMTP authentication (making
the SMTP server open to be
On Thu, 2005-06-09 at 20:08 +0100, robert burrell donkin wrote:
On Wed, 2005-06-08 at 15:08 +1200, Simon Kitching wrote:
On Mon, 2005-06-06 at 22:35 +0100, robert burrell donkin wrote:
The first public release candidate (RC3) for Betwixt 0.6.1 is now
available for download:
On Thu, 2005-06-09 at 20:29 +0100, robert burrell donkin wrote:
On Thu, 2005-06-09 at 10:41 +1200, Simon Kitching wrote:
On Wed, 2005-06-08 at 22:21 +0100, robert burrell donkin wrote:
===
Maven reports:
I would suggest disabling this report. Firstly, a log of the last 30
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The other approach is to include all taglibs, but none of the
dependencies, and add instructions on how to find them - like what Ant does.
I will try this, pulling in all the latest releases rather than current
trunk code - like Maven1 does with
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35304.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
That's actually a good idea.
The most common message will be a ClassNotFound and we can beef up
some docs to make sure that people realize what's needed for each
taglib.
Comments guys?
On 6/10/05, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The other
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35304.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35304.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On 6/9/05, Michael Rasmussen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am attempting to build commons chain from source. I have all the
dependencies except portlet figured out. I looked in the project.xml
file and found pluto as the portlet implementation. I cannot however
find the portlet api. Sun
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35126.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I would agree except that I'm having a hard time figuring out how a new user
would figure out which libraries to use. The exception will be ClassnotFound
nested within some JellyExceptions, so it might not be so obvious.
-Original Message-
From: Dion Gillard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
74 matches
Mail list logo
