DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31477] - The version in the manifest for version 1.7 is wrong it says 1.6

2005-10-03 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31477. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-io (in module jakarta-commons) failed

2005-10-03 Thread Ted Husted
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-io has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affects

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-io (in module jakarta-commons) failed

2005-10-03 Thread Ted Husted
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-io has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affects

Re: [logging] log4j 1.3 support

2005-10-03 Thread Joerg Hohwiller
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jörg Schaible wrote: Simon Kitching wrote: Hi there, [snip] In Log4J1.2, Level extends Priority and Logger extends Category. The log method on Category only takes Priority parameters. So any calls to the log method resolves to a method on a

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-vfs (in module jakarta-commons) failed

2005-10-03 Thread commons-vfs development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-vfs has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affects

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-vfs (in module jakarta-commons) failed

2005-10-03 Thread commons-vfs development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-vfs has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affects

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly (in module commons-jelly) failed

2005-10-03 Thread commons-jelly development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly (in module commons-jelly) failed

2005-10-03 Thread commons-jelly development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31477] - [beanutils] The version in the manifest for version 1.7 is wrong it says 1.6

2005-10-03 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31477. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: [logging] log4j 1.3 support

2005-10-03 Thread Joerg Hohwiller
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Joerg Hohwiller wrote: Jörg Schaible wrote: Simon Kitching wrote: Hi there, Hi again, [snip] I can not see all your guyz problems. I replaced Priority with Level and removed the isAsignableFrom section and everyting works and compiles

Re: [logging] log4j 1.3 support

2005-10-03 Thread Boris Unckel
Hello, I can not see all your guyz problems. I replaced Priority with Level and removed the isAsignableFrom section and everyting works and compiles fine. Even the TRACE is defined in Level and Priority so there is not even reflection magic required. Am I missing something??? Maybe I should get

Re: [io] Commons-IO 1.1 RC1

2005-10-03 Thread Stephen Colebourne
Thanks, I'll put that in pre-release. Stephen --- sebb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Some minor points. Ignore if you don't agree ... The MD5 files have an upper-case .MD5, rather than the more usual .md5. Also, the files don't contain the file name, which means that some common md5

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36899] New: - validation breaks on multiple validation.xml (eg. with Struts 1.3)

2005-10-03 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36899. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36899] - [Validator] validation breaks on multiple validation.xml (eg. with Struts 1.3)

2005-10-03 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36899. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36899] - [Validator] validation breaks on multiple validation.xml (eg. with Struts 1.3)

2005-10-03 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36899. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36899] - [Validator] validation breaks on multiple validation.xml (eg. with Struts 1.3)

2005-10-03 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36899. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: [logging] log4j 1.3 support

2005-10-03 Thread Joerg Hohwiller
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, [snip] Hm, before stating everything works, everything should be described and documented. No one knows your test environment and your tests. This is very true! I just meant that ant test succeeds and in my IDE logging on jcl-trace works with

[Jakarta-commons Wiki] Update of Pool by sandymac

2005-10-03 Thread Apache Wiki
Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Jakarta-commons Wiki for change notification. The following page has been changed by sandymac: http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/Pool --

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30305] - [pool] GenericKeyedObjectPool raises exception while destroying invalidated object

2005-10-03 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30305. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

svn commit: r293460 - in /jakarta/commons/proper/betwixt/trunk: src/java/org/apache/commons/betwixt/ src/java/org/apache/commons/betwixt/strategy/ src/java/org/apache/commons/betwixt/strategy/impl/ xd

2005-10-03 Thread rdonkin
Author: rdonkin Date: Mon Oct 3 15:24:54 2005 New Revision: 293460 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=293460view=rev Log: Factored out collective types into separate strategy. This allows subclasses of standard java types to be (optionally) regarded as plain POJOs. Added:

svn commit: r293462 - /jakarta/commons/proper/betwixt/trunk/

2005-10-03 Thread rdonkin
Author: rdonkin Date: Mon Oct 3 15:31:44 2005 New Revision: 293462 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=293462view=rev Log: Added ignore for another Eclipse file Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/betwixt/trunk/ (props changed) Propchange: jakarta/commons/proper/betwixt/trunk/

svn commit: r293464 - /jakarta/commons/proper/lang/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/lang/builder/ReflectionToStringBuilder.java

2005-10-03 Thread ggregory
Author: ggregory Date: Mon Oct 3 15:44:08 2005 New Revision: 293464 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=293464view=rev Log: Javadoc. Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/lang/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/lang/builder/ReflectionToStringBuilder.java Modified:

Re: [digester] Re: Classloading regression between commons-digester-1.0 and later versions

2005-10-03 Thread Jan Luehe
Hi Robert, robert burrell donkin wrote On 10/01/05 11:11,: hi jan please remember to add the subject prefix for the component. will remember from now on! :) On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 13:57 -0700, Jan Luehe wrote: This may be an old topic, but it seems a classloading regression was introduced

svn commit: r293498 - in /jakarta/commons/proper/validator/trunk/src/share/org/apache/commons/validator: FormSet.java FormSetFactory.java ValidatorResources.java digester-rules.xml

2005-10-03 Thread niallp
Author: niallp Date: Mon Oct 3 19:59:43 2005 New Revision: 293498 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=293498view=rev Log: Fix for Bug 36899 - Merge multiple validation.xml, reported by Wolfgang Gehner. I've changed the digester rules to use a new FormSetFactory class which looks up the

svn commit: r293502 - in /jakarta/commons/proper/validator/trunk/src/test/org/apache/commons/validator: MultipleConfigFilesTest.java validator-multiple-config-1.xml validator-multiple-config-2.xml

2005-10-03 Thread niallp
Author: niallp Date: Mon Oct 3 20:15:56 2005 New Revision: 293502 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=293502view=rev Log: Test that multiple config files are merged correctly. Modified:

[email] Re: Apache Jakarta Commons Email 1.0 released

2005-10-03 Thread Eric Spiegelberg
There is no mention of the v1.0 release of Commons Email listed in the Latest Jakarta News on http://jakarta.apache.org. It's not a big deal, but it would be nice if it were added. Henning Schmiedehausen wrote: The Commons Email team of the Jakarta Project of the ASF is happy to announce the

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36904] New: - [pool] GenericKeyedObjectPool is a LIFO, not a FIFO implementation

2005-10-03 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36904. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36904] - [pool] GenericKeyedObjectPool is a LIFO, not a FIFO implementation

2005-10-03 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36904. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.