Author: imario
Date: Thu Oct 6 23:05:50 2005
New Revision: 307027
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=307027view=rev
Log:
enh: ignore ./ and ../
Modified:
jakarta/commons/proper/vfs/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/vfs/provider/sftp/SftpFileObject.java
Modified:
Emmanuel Bourg [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If you are bothered about the Javadoc warnings, run the code through
Jalopy; it will fix up the javadocs with stubs containing the
parameters, return types and exceptions.
Best regards
Henning
Oliver Heger wrote:
I am having some
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36962.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi All,
A week or so ago I was prompted by new activity on the logging topic to
review what is currently sitting in SVN. I think it's actually quite
good, and perhaps we could try to push for a release.
The issues I'm aware of are:
* Do we include the ServletContextListener stuff or not? And if
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36962.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Simon Kitching [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And do we want to offer 1.3 support, given that 1.3 is still alpha?
I would prefer not to; better to provide a minor release after
log4j 1.3 is released than provide ahead-of-time support and get
it wrong. Actually, for the current release we could
Henning P. Schmiedehausen wrote on Friday, October 07, 2005 11:08 AM:
Emmanuel Bourg [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If you are bothered about the Javadoc warnings, run the code through
Jalopy; it will fix up the javadocs with stubs containing the
parameters, return types and exceptions.
This is
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35863.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
I might suggest using System.identityHashCode() rather than the hashCode()
of the classloader itself just in case a ClassLoader implementation doesn't
play nice with respect to its implementation of hashCode(). We did
something similar in HiveMind.
-Original Message-
From: Niall
Thanks for the suggestion James, I'll update my proposed patch with this:
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35263
Niall
- Original Message -
From: James Carman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 07, 2005 12:37 PM
I might suggest using
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35263.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: niallp
Date: Fri Oct 7 09:47:24 2005
New Revision: 307162
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=307162view=rev
Log:
add LazyDynaList - based on suggestion from Vic Cekvenich
Added:
jakarta/commons/proper/beanutils/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/beanutils/LazyDynaList.java
Thomas Dudziak wrote:
On 10/6/05, Jörg Gottschling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think patching Checkstyle would be the better way.
Good luck! I had a look at their feature request page, and there were
entries from over a year ago.
The Checkstyle team are usually responsive to RFE's with
On 10/7/05, Dennis Lundberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thomas Dudziak wrote:
On 10/6/05, Jörg Gottschling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think patching Checkstyle would be the better way.
Good luck! I had a look at their feature request page, and there were
entries from over a year ago.
Author: niallp
Date: Fri Oct 7 13:35:43 2005
New Revision: 307189
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=307189view=rev
Log:
Revert back Log from being static to instance variable and make transient.
The Log instance variable was causing the LazyDynaList serialization test from
working - I
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36208.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36208.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36208.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36870.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: kohsuke
Date: Fri Oct 7 22:41:08 2005
New Revision: 307264
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=307264view=rev
Log:
we need to run tests.
Modified:
jakarta/commons/sandbox/javaflow/trunk/project.properties
Modified: jakarta/commons/sandbox/javaflow/trunk/project.properties
URL:
Author: kohsuke
Date: Fri Oct 7 22:47:58 2005
New Revision: 307265
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=307265view=rev
Log:
fixed a bug in the stack restoration.
the way the reference stack works is that when a stack frame is saved,
the callee pushs to the rstack, then when restored, the
23 matches
Mail list logo