Re: [collections] New commons proper component - collections-functors

+1 to the new library. I'm wondering if we reach a point where Collections wants Primitives and Collections-Functor as subcomponents. Tricky to handle with our current setup, but maybe an idea for the future. Hen On 11/29/05, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks, Stephen. While I sti

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37706] - [fileupload] Remove Javadoc warnings

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37706] New: - [fileupload] Remove Javadoc warnings

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [collections] New commons proper component - collections-functors

Thanks, Stephen. While I still think 1, 5 are problematic, your responses to the other points are enough to move me to +1 Phil On 11/29/05, Stephen Colebourne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Phil Steitz wrote: > > -0 for following reasons: > > > > 1. I am having a hard time understanding what the va

RE: [jelly] apt tag library

I haven't had a chance to look at it, but I'm +1 based on the amount of work Ryan's done on his end. That's +1 to accept the code and +1 for committer access for Ryan. -Original Message- From: Dion Gillard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 28, 2005 2:50 PM To: Jakarta Comm

Re: [resources] 1.0.0 Release Candidate 1

On 11/28/05, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 11/29/05, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > It might be worthwhile looking at the serializablity contracts in > > [resources]. I don't know if there is interest. > > Maybe, depends what you come up with :-) > OK, unless

Re: [resources] 1.0.0 Release Candidate 1

On 11/29/05, Christian Meder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Always glad to help ;-) > Thanks, I have a busy time coming up so it may be a week or two before I get back to doing any more on resources and looking at the recent bug tickets that have been recorded. Niall > >C

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37704] New: - API Bug in org.apache.commons.validator.ValidatorResult

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [resources] 1.0.0 Release Candidate 1

On Tue, 2005-11-29 at 01:59 +, Niall Pemberton wrote: > On 11/28/05, Christian Meder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon, 2005-11-28 at 21:43 +0100, Christian Meder wrote: > > > On Mon, 2005-11-28 at 03:00 +, Niall Pemberton wrote: > > > > On 11/28/05, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37702] - [resources] Switch argument order in Messages API

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37703] - [resources] setLocale on MessageFormat in Messages

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37703] New: - [resources] setLocale on MessageFormat in Messages

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

[collections] New commons proper component - collections-functors

Phil Steitz wrote: -0 for following reasons: 1. I am having a hard time understanding what the value commons-functor by itself is going to be. How do we expect it to "grow" - independently of collections - other than by replicating functionality in [functor]? Functor in the sandbox may well be

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37702] - Switch argument order in Messages API

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37702] New: - Switch argument order in Messages API

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37700] New: - 1.7.0 MANIFEST.MF has wrong version number

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-html (in module commons-jelly) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-html has an issue affecting its community integration. This i

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-html (in module commons-jelly) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-html has an issue affecting its community integration. This i

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test has an issue affecting its community integration. Th

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test has an issue affecting its community integration. Th

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-define-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-define-test has an issue affecting its community integration.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-define-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-define-test has an issue affecting its community integration.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-swing (in module commons-jelly) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-swing has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-swing (in module commons-jelly) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-swing has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-xml-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-xml-test has an issue affecting its community integration. Th

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-xml-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-xml-test has an issue affecting its community integration. Th

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue a

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue a

RE: [jelly] apt tag library

Dion- I would be happy to join as a committer to maintain my code. Whatever would be best. How do we initiate a vote on accepting the new code? What's a code grant and how do we start work on that? -Ryan > -Original Message- > From: Dion Gillard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37691] - [attributes] CATaglet don't work with Javadoc tool of JDK1.5

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37691] - CATaglet don't work with Javadoc tool of JDK1.5

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: [VOTE] New commons proper component - collections-functors

I wonder if components [sandbox.functors] and [commons-functors] currently have duplicated code. If so, then I prefer to develop sandbox functors component as standalone project. By the way, it has "collections" subpackage. Generally, [collections] should not have functional programming elements

RE: [VOTE] New commons proper component - collections-functors

+1 I support creating a functors library (but not necessarily called collections-functors). Rational: I think functors are a powerful approach to software design, under represented (in java) and non-standardised. I would like to see functors (sandbox) integrated and have a common interface set (a

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37363] - [email] Address char-set can not be individually set

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37344] - [email] HTML Emails with images don't display in Outlook 2000

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [VOTE] New commons proper component - collections-functors

On 11/29/05, Stephen Colebourne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The new component is [collection-functors], so there > should be no confusion. Ok, you're right, that would be clear. > I do expect different release cycles going forward. > There is only a small tie between the two bits of code > (4 in

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37691] - CATaglet don't work with Javadoc tool of JDK1.5

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37691] New: - CATaglet don't work with Javadoc tool of JDK1.5

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [VOTE] New commons proper component - collections-functors

--- Thomas Dudziak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 11/29/05, Stephen Colebourne > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > TransformerUtils -> [collection-functors] > > PredicateUtils -> [collection-functors] > > ClosureUtils -> [collection-functors] > > FactoryUtils -> [collection-functors] > > > > Transfor

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37690] New: - RandomStringUtils.random() family of methods create invalid unicode sequences

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-html (in module commons-jelly) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-html has an issue affecting its community integration. This i

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-html (in module commons-jelly) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-html has an issue affecting its community integration. This i

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37667] - [configuration] BaseConfiguration.addProperty() and MapConfiguration.addProperty() do not behave the same

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test has an issue affecting its community integration. Th

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test has an issue affecting its community integration. Th

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-define-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-define-test has an issue affecting its community integration.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-define-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-define-test has an issue affecting its community integration.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-swing (in module commons-jelly) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-swing has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-swing (in module commons-jelly) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-swing has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-xml-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-xml-test has an issue affecting its community integration. Th

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-xml-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-xml-test has an issue affecting its community integration. Th

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue a

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue a

[el] unified el / jsf 1.2

Hi, is anyone from commons el team listening? If so, can you tell me about any plans for working on a unified el impl? Or will this be on the "task" of the tomcat team? Thanks so far, Matthias - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PR

Re: [VOTE] New commons proper component - collections-functors

On 11/29/05, Stephen Colebourne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > James Carman wrote: > > So, TransformerUtils would have to move into the new component, right? > > Would the Transformer, Closure, and Predicate interfaces stay in the core > > package or go into the new component? > > TransformerUtils ->

Re: Commons Digester issue

Hi George, On Mon, 2005-11-28 at 18:41 +0530, Rethesh George wrote: > In our application which uses commons digester library, we are getting > the following issue. We are using the v 1.2 - commons-digester.jar and > this error occurs mainly when the number of users of the application is > very hig