Re: [vote] access for Niklas Gustavsson to the sandbox

Brett Porter wrote: I'd like to grant him access to commit to the sandbox so he can improve and document exec. I think at this point this is essential to give it some momentum. Plenty of people are interested, but they need to be able to use it first :) +1 --- Mario ---

Re: [vote] access for Niklas Gustavsson to the sandbox

On Fri, 2006-01-13 at 10:18 +1100, Brett Porter wrote: > Hi, > > I know the sandbox is meant to be open to any committers on request, but > Niklas is a recent addition to an incubator project, so I thought it is > best to double check with a vote. > > Niklas contributed the original Ant refactori

Re: [vote] access for Niklas Gustavsson to the sandbox

+1 from me. On 1/13/06, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I know the sandbox is meant to be open to any committers on request, but > Niklas is a recent addition to an incubator project, so I thought it is > best to double check with a vote. > > Niklas contributed the original Ant re

[exec] API sketch?

Hi, Back in September 05 (wow, is it really 2006 already? :) Jerome sent a comprehensive vision for exec. I found myself agreeing with most everything in there (I'll reply to a couple of specifics shortly). Message ID from then: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> However, it was long and wordy. I think the key

Re: [exec] vision for the library

jerome lacoste wrote: > [Sorry for the long mail. I hope I was clear enough this time] Crystal. Just took 4 months to read :) > Current commons-exec features > > > It > - starts commands in the various platforms and SDK. Todays that's the > launcher p

[vote] access for Niklas Gustavsson to the sandbox

Hi, I know the sandbox is meant to be open to any committers on request, but Niklas is a recent addition to an incubator project, so I thought it is best to double check with a vote. Niklas contributed the original Ant refactoring to start commons-exec, and has some outstanding patches that I hav

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31096] - [codec] Deprecated calls and 1 failure in the SoundexTest

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31355] - [codec] Proposed CSV implementation

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38246] - [codec] BinaryCodec.toAsciiString outputs answer in reverse byte order.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [Collections]commons-collections 4.x and backward compatibility w ith 2.x

Rajagopal Manohar , ISDC - Chennai wrote: This is the Java doc from SequencedHashMap @deprecated: Replaced by LinkedMap and ListOrderedMap in map subpackage. Due to be removed in v4.0. We are using java 1.3 and commons collection 2.x. I want to know if our binaries produced by compiling against

Re: [id] TODOs for 1.0?

Hi Rahul, Rahul Akolkar wrote: > On 1/12/06, Jörg Schaible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> - Jörg >> >> BTW: How do you search the archives for "[id]"? All engines drop the >> square brackets and the hit list gets worthless ... >> > > > Seems to vary per mail archives site, this one seems O

Re: [id] TODOs for 1.0?

On 1/12/06, Jörg Schaible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > - Jörg > > BTW: How do you search the archives for "[id]"? All engines drop the square > brackets and the hit list gets worthless ... > Seems to vary per mail archives site, this one seems OK: http://www.nabble.com/forum/Search.jtp?forum=

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38246] - [codec] BinaryCodec.toAsciiString outputs answer in reverse byte order.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

[id] TODOs for 1.0?

Hello guys, just wondering what work has to be done for id-commons-1.0? In Bugzilla only one open question is left unanswered (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35602), anything else is resolved. I remember, that Phil already started this discussion some time ago, but I could not f

[VOTE] Promote SCXML to Proper

It is time for a promotion vote for Commons SCXML [1], whose initial project proposal is archived here [2]. A proposal for the promotion of this component that contained a release plan [3], was posted about 3 weeks ago, and that thread is archived here (amongst other places): http://marc.theaimsg

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38246] New: - BinaryCodec.toAsciiString outputs answer in reverse byte order.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: logging, TCCL JCL 1.0.5 alpha

Hi Robert, >> the problem lies not in the principle: but in the fact that J2EE >> classloading is an absolute nightmare. every clever trick known just >> results in problems in some J2EE container or other and most leak memory I'm quite aware of all the issues with class loading, hence the origi

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-html (in module commons-jelly) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-html has an issue affecting its community integration. This i

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-html (in module commons-jelly) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-html has an issue affecting its community integration. This i

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test has an issue affecting its community integration. Th

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test has an issue affecting its community integration. Th

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-define-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-define-test has an issue affecting its community integration.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-define-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-define-test has an issue affecting its community integration.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-swing (in module commons-jelly) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-swing has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-swing (in module commons-jelly) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-swing has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-xml-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-xml-test has an issue affecting its community integration. Th

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-xml-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-xml-test has an issue affecting its community integration. Th

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue a

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue a

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-javaflow (in module jakarta-commons-sandbox) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-javaflow has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue aff

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-javaflow (in module jakarta-commons-sandbox) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-javaflow has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue aff

[Collections]commons-collections 4.x and backward compatibility w ith 2.x

Hi, This is the Java doc from SequencedHashMap @deprecated: Replaced by LinkedMap and ListOrderedMap in map subpackage. Due to be removed in v4.0. We are using java 1.3 and commons collection 2.x. I want to know if our binaries produced by compiling against commons-collections 2.x continue

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38133] - [validator] [patch] Enhance form to handle nested forms (beans)

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu