RE: [VOTE] Elect Sandy McArthur As Committer

2006-02-15 Thread Jörg Schaible
[+] +1 Elect Sandy [ ] +0 Tentative support but can't make informed judgement [ ] -0 Tentative opposition but can't make informed judgement [ ] -1 Do not elect Sandy - Jörg - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For

svn commit: r377962 - /jakarta/commons/proper/jelly/trunk/jelly-tags/swing/project.xml

2006-02-15 Thread brett
Author: brett Date: Wed Feb 15 00:23:50 2006 New Revision: 377962 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=377962view=rev Log: fix gump build Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/jelly/trunk/jelly-tags/swing/project.xml Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/jelly/trunk/jelly-tags/swing/project.xml

Re: [VOTE] Elect Sandy McArthur As Committer

2006-02-15 Thread Mario Ivankovits
robert burrell donkin schrieb: --8-- [X] +1 Elect Sandy [ ] +0 Tentative support but can't make informed judgement [ ] -0 Tentative opposition but can't make informed judgement [ ] -1 Do not elect Sandy

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38638] - [discovery] Discovery failed to load an inner class

2006-02-15 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38638. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38556] - [dbutils] fillPreparedStatement

2006-02-15 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38556. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-xml-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

2006-02-15 Thread commons-jelly-tags-xml development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-xml-test has an issue affecting its community integration.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-xml-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

2006-02-15 Thread commons-jelly-tags-xml development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-xml-test has an issue affecting its community integration.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-latka (in module jakarta-commons) failed

2006-02-15 Thread Ted Husted
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-latka has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-latka (in module jakarta-commons) failed

2006-02-15 Thread Ted Husted
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-latka has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-html (in module commons-jelly) failed

2006-02-15 Thread commons-jelly-tags-html development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-html has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-html (in module commons-jelly) failed

2006-02-15 Thread commons-jelly-tags-html development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-html has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

2006-02-15 Thread commons-jelly-tags-jsl development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test has an issue affecting its community integration.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

2006-02-15 Thread commons-jelly-tags-jsl development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test has an issue affecting its community integration.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-define-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

2006-02-15 Thread commons-jelly-tags-define development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-define-test has an issue affecting its community

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-define-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

2006-02-15 Thread commons-jelly-tags-define development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-define-test has an issue affecting its community

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38654] New: - Problem with setting properties which are strings array.

2006-02-15 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38654. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38656] New: - commons-email does not work using mailSession in tomcat

2006-02-15 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38656. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38656] - commons-email does not work using mailSession in tomcat

2006-02-15 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38656. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: commons-email needs care

2006-02-15 Thread Piero Ottuzzi
Hi Dion, all, I'm still alive ;) Attached you can find my reworked patch to fix many problems you can have if using commons-email with a MailSession mainly caused by typos in constant declaration or missing constant declaration. It fixes bugs 38538 and 38656 (just opened to hold the patch):

[jelly] Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

2006-02-15 Thread Dion Gillard
Looks like my recent changes to JEXL have fixed this one. The others appear to be jaxen related. On 2/14/06, commons-jelly development commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org wrote: To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit

Re: [jelly] Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

2006-02-15 Thread Paul Libbrecht
At least I can confirm this on my local machine... paul Dion Gillard wrote: Looks like my recent changes to JEXL have fixed this one. The others appear to be jaxen related. On 2/14/06, commons-jelly development commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org wrote: To whom it may engage... This is an

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38654] - [beanutils] Problem with setting properties which are strings array.

2006-02-15 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38654. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38656] - [email] commons-email does not work using mailSession in tomcat

2006-02-15 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38656. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38657] New: - Patch to add crypto-compatible BigInteger encoding support to Base64

2006-02-15 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38657. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38657] - Patch to add crypto-compatible BigInteger encoding support to Base64

2006-02-15 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38657. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38657] - [codec] Patch to add crypto-compatible BigInteger encoding support to Base64

2006-02-15 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38657. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38659] New: - Maven repository SNAPSHOT upgrade

2006-02-15 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38659. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: [ftp][Fwd: [VFS] FTP Sending LIST while in binary mode]

2006-02-15 Thread Daniel F. Savarese
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Mario Ivankovits writes: Ever heard of this? I ran into a problem with a strict FTP server that needs the LIST command to be send while on ascii mode. If it is sent on binary mode, The RFC states the data transfer for LIST is of type ASCII or EBCDIC. It's up to

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32801] - [collections] [PATCH] Provide maps with direct indexed access to the entries

2006-02-15 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32801. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38660] New: - [pool] proposed ObjectPools.borrowObject JavaDoc changes for 2.0

2006-02-15 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38660. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38660] - [pool] proposed ObjectPools.borrowObject JavaDoc changes for 2.0

2006-02-15 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38660. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32801] - [collections] [PATCH] Provide maps with direct indexed access to the entries

2006-02-15 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32801. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38661] New: - ReferenceMap size of bug.

2006-02-15 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38661. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: New Subproject / Dbutils Proposal

2006-02-15 Thread Karthik Kumar
Hi, Update: XML confiugrator done (currently DOM), although DTD might change soon. I've kept a working sample (binary and source) ... I built using Eclipse ... shall port to ant/maven soon) .. Try it out, and let me know about the feasibility of using it :) Check:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38661] - [collections] ReferenceMap size of bug.

2006-02-15 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38661. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: [VOTE] Elect Sandy McArthur As Committer

2006-02-15 Thread Oliver Heger
--8-- [x] +1 Elect Sandy [ ] +0 Tentative support but can't make informed judgement [ ] -0 Tentative opposition but can't make informed judgement [ ] -1 Do not elect Sandy

svn commit: r378081 - in /jakarta/commons/proper/configuration/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/configuration/beanutils: BeanDeclaration.java BeanFactory.java

2006-02-15 Thread oheger
Author: oheger Date: Wed Feb 15 12:12:34 2006 New Revision: 378081 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=378081view=rev Log: New interfaces for declaring beans in configuration files Added:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34353] - [configuration] Provide support for declaring and creating objects

2006-02-15 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34353. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

[Codec] accented character soundex revisited

2006-02-15 Thread Chris Black
Over 18 months ago there was a thread on this list about the proper handling of accented characters in the Soundex encoder in commons-codec but it never seemed to get resolved. In addition, there are still failing unit tests that reference this issue in the current version of the code. As

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38664] New: - [pool] proposed PoolableObjectFactorys JavaDoc changes for 2.0

2006-02-15 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38664. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38664] - [pool] proposed PoolableObjectFactorys JavaDoc changes for 2.0

2006-02-15 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38664. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

svn commit: r378103 - /jakarta/commons/proper/email/trunk/xdocs/changes.xml

2006-02-15 Thread dion
Author: dion Date: Wed Feb 15 13:53:04 2006 New Revision: 378103 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=378103view=rev Log: If you provide a mailSession in tomcat you cannot send email using commons-email: the problem is mainly caused by typos or missing constant declaration. Modified:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38656] - [email] commons-email does not work using mailSession in tomcat

2006-02-15 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38656. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38538] - [email] Bad Exception message when using a supplied MailSession

2006-02-15 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38538. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: commons-email needs care

2006-02-15 Thread Dion Gillard
Tested and applied. On 2/16/06, Piero Ottuzzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Dion, all, I'm still alive ;) Attached you can find my reworked patch to fix many problems you can have if using commons-email with a MailSession mainly caused by typos in constant declaration or missing constant

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38666] New: - [pool] proposed ObjectPools.getNum{Active,Idle} JavaDoc changes for 2.0

2006-02-15 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38666. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38666] - [pool] proposed ObjectPools.getNum{Active,Idle} JavaDoc changes for 2.0

2006-02-15 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38666. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: [ftp][Fwd: [VFS] FTP Sending LIST while in binary mode]

2006-02-15 Thread Daniel F. Savarese
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Mario Ivankovits writes: Sure, I can do this, but shouldnt [net] try to be RFC compliant? Leaving it to the user to be compliant is odd, isnt it? The original intent of commons-net was to provide low-level access to IETF protocols. That meant providing primitive

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38667] New: - [pool] proposed ObjectPools.close JavaDoc changes for 2.0

2006-02-15 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38667. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: [cli] Moving forward

2006-02-15 Thread James Ring
Hi Stephen and all, (Sorry for the late reply) On Tuesday 14 February 2006 08:36, Stephen Colebourne wrote: Henri Yandell wrote: On the compatibility interface; I'd rather just drop it and spend that effort on migration documentation. Does raise the question of whether the cli2 package

Re: [ftp][Fwd: [VFS] FTP Sending LIST while in binary mode]

2006-02-15 Thread Matt Benson
--- Daniel F. Savarese [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [SNIP] any rate, I don't have a strong opinion and if most folks think it makes more sense for FTPClient to take care of the detail, then let's do that. What do others think? The trend seems to have been to want commons-net (at least the ftp

RE: [Codec] accented character soundex revisited

2006-02-15 Thread Gary Gregory
Hello Chris: Welcome to Codec development. One obvious thing: Make sure you start with latest from SVN: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jakarta/commons/proper/codec/trunk (as opposed to the 1.3 sources) You mention unit test failures? When I run: ant clean jar test All unit tests pass. I

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38669] New: - [pool] proposed ObjectPoolFactorys JavaDoc changes for 2.0

2006-02-15 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38669. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38669] - [pool] proposed ObjectPoolFactorys JavaDoc changes for 2.0

2006-02-15 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38669. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: [Codec] accented character soundex revisited

2006-02-15 Thread Chris Black
I am running the latest, I even did a new svn co into a new directory to check: mkdir codec2 svn co https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jakarta/commons/proper/codec/trunk cd codec2 (set up build.properties to point to my junit.jar) ant clean jar test Gives me a failure on SoundexTest. I am junning

[all] clover.license file?

2006-02-15 Thread Gary Gregory
Hello: Where in SVN (or still in CVS) do we keep our clover.license file? Gary - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [Codec] accented character soundex revisited

2006-02-15 Thread Gary Gregory
This is odd indeed. I use Ant 1.6.5 and JUnit 3.8.1. Here is my Ant build output: Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600] (C) Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp. C:\svn-store\jakarta\commons\codecant jar test Buildfile: build.xml init: [echo] commons-codec 1.4-dev

Re: [Codec] accented character soundex revisited

2006-02-15 Thread Chris Black
I compared your output to mine, and one thing I noticed was that my SoundexTest line is different, only 19 tests run and 1 failure (probably just because it quits after the first failure). I am running on SuSE Linux 9.2 with ant 1.6.2. I worry that it is something stupid but I've checked all I

Re: [fileupload] Efficient upload stream reading API?

2006-02-15 Thread David Holroyd
I'm unsubscribing from this list for the time being, but would still love to see a comment (either way) on: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38623 thanks! dave On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 09:02:31AM +, David Holroyd wrote: All, The current FileUpload API only allows

Troubles with Ant configuration

2006-02-15 Thread KoloSSo
Hi!!! I'm new in this list, my name is Deyner López Fernández. I downloaded Ant 1.6 and tried to use it to build my own project, but despite I read Ant´s Manual before i tried to use it, Ant has been give me truoblesSometimes run and sometimes not run. I configure Ant as the manual said.

[pool] Queue-, SoftReference-based object pool

2006-02-15 Thread Javier Kohen
Hi, I implemented an ObjectPool based on the SoftReferenceObjectPool in commons pool. My implementation takes a java.util.queue and has no internal synchronization, leaving that up to the queue implementation. This is useful, for instance, in concurrent applications that share the pool among

[Codec][Lang] Maven version

2006-02-15 Thread Gary Gregory
Hello: I am currently using Maven 1.0.2. Has anyone been using Maven 2.to build Codec or Lang? Thanks, Gary - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Codec][Lang] Maven version

2006-02-15 Thread Brett Porter
AFAIK the only Maven 2 built projects are in the Sandbox (exec, openpgp in particular are builds I've done). I think the general consensus was to make all of commons site and release requirements work on those before any others considered it to minimise disruption. - Brett Gary Gregory wrote:

Re: [pool] Queue-, SoftReference-based object pool

2006-02-15 Thread Sandy McArthur
It does make sense to back a FIFO pool with a java.util.Queue but the Queue is a Java 1.5 feature and it will be a while before Java 1.5 is a Pool requirement. The current version of Pool requires Java 1.3 and after one more mostly bug fix release Pool 2.0 will be started which will using Java 1.4

Re: Troubles with Ant configuration

2006-02-15 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Wed, 15 Feb 2006, KoloSSo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I downloaded Ant 1.6 and tried to use it to build my own project, but despite I read Ant´s Manual before i tried to use it, Ant has been give me truobles You are on the wrong list here, please ask your questions on user@ant.apache.org

Re: [all] clover.license file?

2006-02-15 Thread Henri Yandell
svn:committers/donated-licences/clover/ On 2/15/06, Gary Gregory [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello: Where in SVN (or still in CVS) do we keep our clover.license file? Gary - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For