Re: [logging] please check release candidate 5

2006-02-16 Thread Boris Unckel
Good Morning, Simon Kitching wrote: At some point I think it would be a good idea to post a notice to the tomcat dev list, as the subscribers there are likely to (a) care about JCL, and (b) have some interesting apps to test it with. Maybe jboss would also be good to contact, as they have had pr

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35774] - [logging] TCCL problem in J2EE Container

2006-02-16 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38686] - [VFS] Default VFS cache behavior

2006-02-16 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38690] New: - [pool] BaseObjectPool closed boolean field needs to be volatile

2006-02-16 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38688] - [net] TelnetInputStream.read sometimes hangs if reader thread is disabled

2006-02-16 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38689] - nested properties on beans fetched from a list do not get populated

2006-02-16 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: [all] clover.license file?

2006-02-16 Thread Gary Gregory
Rahul: Nope, it does not work because the license has expired. I am pondering a [codec] ticket right now. If you could add Cobertura support and just turn off without deleting the Clover stuff, that would be great. Thank you in advance for your help. Gary > -Original Message- > From: Ra

svn commit: r378403 - /jakarta/commons/proper/codec/trunk/project.properties

2006-02-16 Thread ggregory
Author: ggregory Date: Thu Feb 16 16:15:40 2006 New Revision: 378403 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=378403&view=rev Log: Following instructions in: https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/donated-licenses/clover/README.txt Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/codec/trunk/project.

Re: [beanutils] getPropertyDescriptor(s)

2006-02-16 Thread Matt Benson
--- Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2/16/06, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Craig: thanks for your quick reply. My (possibly > > naive) impression was that you would specify > > DynaBean's get(String) and set(String, Object) > > methods... :) Now, tell me why that won

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38689] New: - nested properties on beans fetched from a list do not get populated

2006-02-16 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [beanutils] getPropertyDescriptor(s)

2006-02-16 Thread Craig McClanahan
2/16/06, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 2/16/06, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > > > Hi all, > > > what are the primary reasons why DynaBean support > > has > > > not yet been implemented for these PropertyUtil

Re: [logging] please check release candidate 5

2006-02-16 Thread Simon Kitching
On Thu, 2006-02-16 at 23:09 +, robert burrell donkin wrote: > i'm now reasonably satisfied with this release candidate. if there's > anyone with a wondoz box and a few cycles, i'd be very grateful if you > could check the EOLs on the zips (source and binary). > > my plan is to leave it a day o

Re: [beanutils] getPropertyDescriptor(s)

2006-02-16 Thread Matt Benson
--- Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2/16/06, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > what are the primary reasons why DynaBean support > has > > not yet been implemented for these PropertyUtils > > methods in beanutils? I assume there are some > > concerns in

Re: [beanutils] getPropertyDescriptor(s)

2006-02-16 Thread Craig McClanahan
On 2/16/06, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi all, > what are the primary reasons why DynaBean support has > not yet been implemented for these PropertyUtils > methods in beanutils? I assume there are some > concerns involved in how to implement this... what are > they? Although it's

[logging] please check release candidate 5

2006-02-16 Thread robert burrell donkin
i'm now reasonably satisfied with this release candidate. if there's anyone with a wondoz box and a few cycles, i'd be very grateful if you could check the EOLs on the zips (source and binary). my plan is to leave it a day or two to see whether anyone here can find any problems. i'll then cut a r

Re: [logging] Code Freeze

2006-02-16 Thread Simon Kitching
Thanks Robert! On Thu, 2006-02-16 at 22:53 +, robert burrell donkin wrote: > done > > - rober > > On Thu, 2006-02-16 at 22:10 +, robert burrell donkin wrote: > > i will cut release candidate 5 some time after 2230 GMT today. please do > > not commit code until the all clear. --

[beanutils] getPropertyDescriptor(s)

2006-02-16 Thread Matt Benson
Hi all, what are the primary reasons why DynaBean support has not yet been implemented for these PropertyUtils methods in beanutils? I assume there are some concerns involved in how to implement this... what are they? Thanks, Matt __ Do You Yahoo!?

Re: [logging] Code Freeze

2006-02-16 Thread robert burrell donkin
done - rober On Thu, 2006-02-16 at 22:10 +, robert burrell donkin wrote: > i will cut release candidate 5 some time after 2230 GMT today. please do > not commit code until the all clear. > > - robert - To unsubscribe, e-ma

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38688] New: - TelnetInputStream.read sometimes hangs if reader thread is disabled

2006-02-16 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Potential Bug In Circular Redirect

2006-02-16 Thread Oleg Kalnichevski
On Thu, 2006-02-16 at 17:24 -0500, Ryan Smith wrote: ... > > > I am using 3.0 RELEASE > But i checked out the latest snap shot code, and the logic in > HttpMethodDirector.java only checks for the URI, not URI + Query string. > Ryan, I think this behavior is correct. It was implemented per thi

svn commit: r378384 - /jakarta/commons/proper/logging/tags/LOGGING_1_1_0_RC5/

2006-02-16 Thread rdonkin
Author: rdonkin Date: Thu Feb 16 14:31:49 2006 New Revision: 378384 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=378384&view=rev Log: Cut release candidate 5 Added: jakarta/commons/proper/logging/tags/LOGGING_1_1_0_RC5/ - copied from r378383, jakarta/commons/proper/logging/trunk/ --

Re: Potential Bug In Circular Redirect

2006-02-16 Thread Ryan Smith
Oleg Kalnichevski wrote: On Thu, 2006-02-16 at 15:39 -0500, Ryan Smith wrote: If i try a GET request on http://domain.com/site.html?x=1 And the domain.com web server does a 302 redirect to : /site.html?y=2 HttpCleint thinks its a Circular redirect b/c its *JUST* looking at the uri, not t

Re: [all] clover.license file?

2006-02-16 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On 2/16/06, Gary Gregory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello Rahul: > > I am open to using another coverage tool but I do not have the time to > implement the switch. For now, I just want the current build to work. > Understandable, did you get it to work? If you ever want to switch so users don't

Re: svn commit: r377559 - in /jakarta/commons: sandbox/compress/trunk/ sandbox/csv/trunk/ sandbox/i18n/trunk/ sandbox/id/trunk/ sandbox/javaflow/trunk/ sandbox/pipeline/trunk/ sandbox/proxy/trunk/ san

2006-02-16 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On 2/13/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Author: niallp > Date: Mon Feb 13 17:17:27 2006 > New Revision: 377559 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=377559&view=rev > Log: > Modify maven build to add two non-standard attributes to the jar's manifest > file to indicate the v

[logging] Code Freeze

2006-02-16 Thread robert burrell donkin
i will cut release candidate 5 some time after 2230 GMT today. please do not commit code until the all clear. - robert signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

svn commit: r378375 - in /jakarta/commons/proper/validator/trunk/xdocs: cvs-usage.xml issue-tracking.xml navigation.xml

2006-02-16 Thread niallp
Author: niallp Date: Thu Feb 16 14:03:55 2006 New Revision: 378375 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=378375&view=rev Log: Add links to Apache Contributors guide and re-arrange menu Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/validator/trunk/xdocs/cvs-usage.xml jakarta/commons/proper/validator/t

svn commit: r378374 - /jakarta/commons/proper/logging/trunk/RELEASE-NOTES.txt

2006-02-16 Thread rdonkin
Author: rdonkin Date: Thu Feb 16 14:01:49 2006 New Revision: 378374 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=378374&view=rev Log: Added section to release notes about JDK compatibility. Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/logging/trunk/RELEASE-NOTES.txt Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/logging/tr

svn commit: r378372 - /jakarta/commons/proper/logging/trunk/RELEASE-NOTES.txt

2006-02-16 Thread rdonkin
Author: rdonkin Date: Thu Feb 16 13:55:45 2006 New Revision: 378372 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=378372&view=rev Log: A few cosmetic changes. I think I prefer jar file to jarfile. Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/logging/trunk/RELEASE-NOTES.txt Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/logg

Re: Potential Bug In Circular Redirect

2006-02-16 Thread Oleg Kalnichevski
On Thu, 2006-02-16 at 15:39 -0500, Ryan Smith wrote: > If i try a GET request on > > http://domain.com/site.html?x=1 > > And the domain.com web server does a 302 redirect to : /site.html?y=2 > > HttpCleint thinks its a Circular redirect b/c its *JUST* looking at the > uri, not the uri + query s

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38686] - [vfs] Default VFS cache behavior

2006-02-16 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38685] - [validator] Error Message '{field} is not in the range null through null' in validator framework

2006-02-16 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: [all] clover.license file?

2006-02-16 Thread Gary Gregory
Hello Rahul: I am open to using another coverage tool but I do not have the time to implement the switch. For now, I just want the current build to work. Gary > -Original Message- > From: Rahul Akolkar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 10:38 AM > To: Jakarta C

Potential Bug In Circular Redirect

2006-02-16 Thread Ryan Smith
If i try a GET request on http://domain.com/site.html?x=1 And the domain.com web server does a 302 redirect to : /site.html?y=2 HttpCleint thinks its a Circular redirect b/c its *JUST* looking at the uri, not the uri + query string. Not sure if this breaks the protocol or not, but thought i

Re: [pool] Queue-, SoftReference-based object pool

2006-02-16 Thread Javier Kohen
Sandy, El mié, 15-02-2006 a las 22:20 -0500, Sandy McArthur escribió: > It does make sense to back a FIFO pool with a java.util.Queue but the > Queue is a Java 1.5 feature and it will be a while before Java 1.5 is > a Pool requirement. The current version of Pool requires Java 1.3 and > after one

svn commit: r378363 - in /jakarta/commons/proper/logging/trunk: build.xml project.xml src/conf/MANIFEST.MF

2006-02-16 Thread rdonkin
Author: rdonkin Date: Thu Feb 16 12:53:27 2006 New Revision: 378363 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=378363&view=rev Log: Preparing for release candidate 5. Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/logging/trunk/build.xml jakarta/commons/proper/logging/trunk/project.xml jakarta/commons/

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38626] - [logging] LogFactory#getLogFactory should not look for method every time

2006-02-16 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36927] - [logging] Disabling of TCCL

2006-02-16 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37484] - [logging] call to getClassLoader() in LogFactoryImpl not checked for null

2006-02-16 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35774] - [logging] TCCL problem in J2EE Container

2006-02-16 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38499] - [logging][PATCH] Minor improvement to JARs within Build

2006-02-16 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

svn commit: r378357 - /jakarta/commons/proper/logging/trunk/build.xml

2006-02-16 Thread rdonkin
Author: rdonkin Date: Thu Feb 16 12:29:01 2006 New Revision: 378357 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=378357&view=rev Log: After some consideration removed the indexes. JCL isn't signed and so anyone using it in an applet would need to rejar and sign in any case. They can index at the same

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38686] New: - Default VFS cache behavior

2006-02-16 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38685] - [validator] Error Message '{field} is not in the range null through null' in validator framework

2006-02-16 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38685] New: - Error Message '{field} is not in the range null through null' in validator framework

2006-02-16 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38684] - [betwixt] ValueSuppressionStrategy.ALLOW_ALL_VALUES suppresses all Attributes

2006-02-16 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38684] New: - ValueSuppressionStrategy.ALLOW_ALL_VALUES suppresses all Attributes

2006-02-16 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [jelly] Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

2006-02-16 Thread Henri Yandell
Nice going :) 1 down. Thanks, Hen On 2/15/06, Dion Gillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Looks like my recent changes to JEXL have fixed this one. The others > appear to be jaxen related. > > On 2/14/06, commons-jelly development wrote: > > To whom it may engage... > > > > This is an automated r

Re: [VOTE] Elect Sandy McArthur As Committer

2006-02-16 Thread Martin van den Bemt
Sorry for the late reaction.. +1... Mvgr, Martin robert burrell donkin wrote: Sandy McArthur has been contributing high quality patches for commons-pool for a few months now and has been the main driving force towards both fixing current issues and pushing the component forwards. He has demons

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38661] - [collections] ReferenceMap size of bug.

2006-02-16 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38683] - [beanutils] Improve message for "Unknown property"

2006-02-16 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38679] - [VFS] MD5 file comparison failed whereas it should not

2006-02-16 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [all] clover.license file?

2006-02-16 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On 2/16/06, Gary Gregory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello: > > (It is not in https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf, right?) > > Would that be in the repos-private directory? > > I do not seem to have access [1] to that but I am a committer. > This tedium continues to drive more components to specify

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38683] New: - Improve message for "Unknown property"

2006-02-16 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [all] clover.license file?

2006-02-16 Thread Davanum Srinivas
https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers On 2/16/06, Gary Gregory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello: > > (It is not in https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf, right?) > > Would that be in the repos-private directory? > > I do not seem to have access [1] to that but I am a committer. > > What roo

[Net] TelnetInputStream.read sometimes hangs if reader thread is disabled

2006-02-16 Thread Rob Hasselbaum
Hi, I'm trying to use TelnetClient with the reader thread disabled because I don't want socket timeouts to fire during planned periods of inactivity (bug #31122). But when the thread is disabled, I'm finding that TelnetInputStream.read hangs forever sometimes while I'm trying to read output from

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38679] - [VFS] MD5 file comparison failed whereas it should not

2006-02-16 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: [all] clover.license file?

2006-02-16 Thread Gary Gregory
Hello: (It is not in https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf, right?) Would that be in the repos-private directory? I do not seem to have access [1] to that but I am a committer. What root URL should I use? Thanks Gary [1] From Eclipse: RA layer request failed svn: PROPFIND request failed on '

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38679] - [VFS] MD5 file comparison failed whereas it should not

2006-02-16 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38679] - [VFS] MD5 file comparison failed whereas it should not

2006-02-16 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

repository:copy-jar problem

2006-02-16 Thread ravi kumar
hai, i getting the problem in using the repository:copy-jar the goal that i run is: maven -DgroupId=activation -Dtype=jar -Dartifact=${maven.repo.home}\activation\activation-1.0.jar repository:copy-jar error that i got Execute failed: java.io.IOException: CreateProcess: ssh -l USERNAME_NOT_

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38679] - [VFS] MD5 file comparison failed whereas it should not

2006-02-16 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38679] - [VFS] MD5 file comparison failed whereas it should not

2006-02-16 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38679] - [VFS] MD5 file comparison failed whereas it should not

2006-02-16 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38679] - [VFS] MD5 file comparison failed whereas it should not

2006-02-16 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [net] FTP ListingFunctionalTest no longer works

2006-02-16 Thread Jeffrey D. Brekke
We'll I haven't been successful in finding an alternate for that site. Our parser is specific in looking for VMS-like directory listings and while I could find vms hosted ftp sites, they all had unix compatible listings. I'll keep looking and check with some colleagues. I did verify against i

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38679] - [VFS] MD5 file comparison failed whereas it should not

2006-02-16 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38659] - [VFS] Maven repository SNAPSHOT upgrade

2006-02-16 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38679] - [VFS] MD5 file comparison failed whereas it should not

2006-02-16 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38679] New: - MD5 file comparison failed whereas it should not

2006-02-16 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38678] New: - [Validator] ValidatorResult.getActionMap() or ValidatorResult.getActions() only contain last run dependency per field

2006-02-16 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38661] - [collections] ReferenceMap size of bug.

2006-02-16 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [Validator] ValidatorResult.getActionMap() or ValidatorResult.getActions() only contain last run dependency per field

2006-02-16 Thread Niall Pemberton
Hi Bart, I'll try to look at this in the next couple of days. Could you file it as a bug report please so that it doesn't get forgotten: http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/validator/issue-tracking.html If you have the time a patch (and test case) would be really great: http://www.apache.org/dev/

[Validator] ValidatorResult.getActionMap() or ValidatorResult.getActions() only contain last run dependency per field

2006-02-16 Thread bart vandendriessche
Hi, I just started using Validator yesterday, and tried to find some info on this particular problem but couldn't find anything, so my apologies if this has been posted about before. I'm using Validator outside of Struts, I don't believe this has any impact on the situation, but I do find it s