[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-daemon (in module jakarta-commons) failed

2006-02-28 Thread Stefan Bodewig
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-daemon has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-daemon (in module jakarta-commons) failed

2006-02-28 Thread Stefan Bodewig
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-daemon has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-launcher (in module jakarta-commons) failed

2006-02-28 Thread Stefan Bodewig
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-launcher has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-launcher (in module jakarta-commons) failed

2006-02-28 Thread Stefan Bodewig
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-launcher has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-threading (in module jakarta-commons-dormant) failed

2006-02-28 Thread Ted Husted
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-threading has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-threading (in module jakarta-commons-dormant) failed

2006-02-28 Thread Ted Husted
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-threading has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[email] ant dist fails / dependencies not found

2006-02-28 Thread C. Grobmeier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, ant dist fails, cause the dependencies cannot be found. http://www.ibiblio.org/maven/javamail/jars/javamail-1.3.3.jar http://www.ibiblio.org/maven/javamail/jars/javamail-1.3.3.jar ... brought an I/O Exception, trying to download this from

Re: [email] ant dist fails / dependencies not found

2006-02-28 Thread Dion Gillard
The javamail jars cannot be distributed by themselves as they are licensed under the Sun Binary Code License. I thought the generated ant build.xml would allow you to specify an alternate location of javamail.jar as a a property? is this not working? On 2/28/06, C. Grobmeier [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [email] ant dist fails / dependencies not found

2006-02-28 Thread C. Grobmeier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dion Gillard wrote: The javamail jars cannot be distributed by themselves as they are licensed under the Sun Binary Code License. I thought the generated ant build.xml would allow you to specify an alternate location of javamail.jar as a a

Re: [email] ant dist fails / dependencies not found

2006-02-28 Thread Dion Gillard
If you define a property (in build.properties) javamail.jar=c:/myjars/javamail-1.3.3.ar AFAIK, the build.xml will notice this and copy it into ./lib On 2/28/06, C. Grobmeier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dion Gillard wrote: The javamail jars

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38798] - [validator] validator argument - resource=false ignored

2006-02-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38798. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: [email] ant dist fails / dependencies not found

2006-02-28 Thread C. Grobmeier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dion Gillard wrote: If you define a property (in build.properties) javamail.jar=c:/myjars/javamail-1.3.3.ar AFAIK, the build.xml will notice this and copy it into ./lib No, this doesn't work as expected. Cause the build-file works with get, i

Re: [all] building the site?

2006-02-28 Thread Arnaud HERITIER
Hi Phil, Yes, I'll try to find a solution to use maven 1.1 to build the commons. I'll certainly need to readd xerces to the core :-( to allow you to use XML entities. cheers arnaud On 2/28/06, Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Both of these requirements - maven 1.0.2 and xdoc 1.9.2 -

Re: [all] building the site?

2006-02-28 Thread Paul Libbrecht
You wouldn't need to read Xerces in any line... you just need to use an org.xml.sax.InputSource which has a properly set system-id. new InputSource(URL) or new InputSource(File) does make it for you. Generally such resolution error happen to be when an InputSource(InputStream) is used for

Re: [email] ant dist fails / dependencies not found

2006-02-28 Thread matthew.hawthorne
C. Grobmeier wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dion Gillard wrote: If you define a property (in build.properties) javamail.jar=c:/myjars/javamail-1.3.3.ar AFAIK, the build.xml will notice this and copy it into ./lib No, this doesn't work as expected. Cause the build-file

publishing commons-modeler jar to maven 2 repo

2006-02-28 Thread anita kulshreshtha
Hi, Geronimo uses commomns-modeler-1.1.jar. How can I get this jar published to maven2 repository? The repository has 1.1M1. Thanks IN Advance Anita __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around

Re: [email] ant dist fails / dependencies not found

2006-02-28 Thread Dion Gillard
I'll test this as well. I thought just the file name would work, but will verify the URL approach as well. On 3/1/06, matthew.hawthorne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: C. Grobmeier wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dion Gillard wrote: If you define a property (in

Re: [email] ant dist fails / dependencies not found

2006-02-28 Thread Dennis Lundberg
matthew.hawthorne wrote: C. Grobmeier wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dion Gillard wrote: If you define a property (in build.properties) javamail.jar=c:/myjars/javamail-1.3.3.ar AFAIK, the build.xml will notice this and copy it into ./lib No, this doesn't work as

Re: [logging] JCL1 LogFactory incompatibility with WAS

2006-02-28 Thread Simon Kitching
On Mon, 2006-02-27 at 21:19 +, robert burrell donkin wrote: On Mon, 2006-02-27 at 12:13 +0100, Boris Unckel wrote: Hello, hi boris I have tested several other cases, the results and conditions are in the zip. I am really wondering about one case: The delegation mode of all

Re: [logging] JCL1 LogFactory incompatibility with WAS

2006-02-28 Thread robert burrell donkin
On Wed, 2006-03-01 at 11:03 +1300, Simon Kitching wrote: On Mon, 2006-02-27 at 21:19 +, robert burrell donkin wrote: On Mon, 2006-02-27 at 12:13 +0100, Boris Unckel wrote: Hello, hi boris I have tested several other cases, the results and conditions are in the zip. I am

[logging] testing harmony jchevm

2006-02-28 Thread Jean-frederic Clere
Hi, I am trying logging + log4j with harmony jchevm but when I am using commons-logging-1.0.4 and logging-log4j-1.2.13 I have an exception: +++ java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: org/apache/log4j/Category.log(Ljava/lang/String;Lorg/apache/log4j/Level;Ljava/lang/Object;Ljava/lang/Throwable;)V

Re: [logging] testing harmony jchevm

2006-02-28 Thread robert burrell donkin
On Tue, 2006-02-28 at 23:39 +0100, Jean-frederic Clere wrote: Hi, I am trying logging + log4j with harmony jchevm but when I am using commons-logging-1.0.4 and logging-log4j-1.2.13 I have an exception: +++ java.lang.NoSuchMethodError:

Re: [JEXL] Blocks and an Expression

2006-02-28 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On 2/27/06, Dion Gillard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok, I've found the cause of the problem. ExpressionFactory.createNewExpression on line 125 does this: SimpleNode node = (SimpleNode) tree.jjtGetChild(0); So only the first statement of the parsed expression is actually evaluated. In

svn commit: r381826 - /jakarta/commons/proper/logging/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/logging/impl/LogFactoryImpl.java

2006-02-28 Thread skitching
Author: skitching Date: Tue Feb 28 15:31:20 2006 New Revision: 381826 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=381826view=rev Log: Minor diagnostics tweak: use word from instead of confusion -. Modified:

svn commit: r381828 - /jakarta/commons/proper/logging/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/logging/LogFactory.java

2006-02-28 Thread skitching
Author: skitching Date: Tue Feb 28 15:32:27 2006 New Revision: 381828 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=381828view=rev Log: Diagnostics changes only: * Output correct classloader used to load LogFactory implementation * Use word from instead of confusing - * Other minor improvements to

Re: [logging] testing harmony jchevm

2006-02-28 Thread Jean-frederic Clere
robert burrell donkin wrote: On Tue, 2006-02-28 at 23:39 +0100, Jean-frederic Clere wrote: Hi, I am trying logging + log4j with harmony jchevm but when I am using commons-logging-1.0.4 and logging-log4j-1.2.13 I have an exception: +++ java.lang.NoSuchMethodError:

Re: [logging] testing harmony jchevm

2006-02-28 Thread Simon Kitching
On Tue, 2006-02-28 at 22:59 +, robert burrell donkin wrote: On Tue, 2006-02-28 at 23:39 +0100, Jean-frederic Clere wrote: Hi, I am trying logging + log4j with harmony jchevm but when I am using commons-logging-1.0.4 and logging-log4j-1.2.13 I have an exception: +++

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36927] - [logging] Disabling of TCCL

2006-02-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36927. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

svn commit: r381838 - /jakarta/commons/proper/logging/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/logging/Log.java

2006-02-28 Thread skitching
Author: skitching Date: Tue Feb 28 15:57:11 2006 New Revision: 381838 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=381838view=rev Log: Trivial javadoc patch to add return type info for isXXXEnabled methods. Thanks to Boris Unckel for patch; see bugzilla#38783. Modified:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38783] - [logging][PATCH] Javadoc for jul.Log interface

2006-02-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38783. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: [JEXL] Blocks and an Expression

2006-02-28 Thread Dion Gillard
On 3/1/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip So, the question becomes, should we support multiple statements for an expression (outside a block), or do we implement ASTJexlScript so that it evaluates each of it's children in turn and returns the last value? snap/ Neither?

svn commit: r381845 - /jakarta/commons/proper/jexl/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/jexl/ExpressionFactory.java

2006-02-28 Thread rahul
Author: rahul Date: Tue Feb 28 16:20:54 2006 New Revision: 381845 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=381845view=rev Log: Log warning instead of silently ignoring expressions beyond the first (if there are more than one). Modified:

Re: [logging] JCL1 LogFactory incompatibility with WAS

2006-02-28 Thread Simon Kitching
On Thu, 2006-02-23 at 23:05 +, robert burrell donkin wrote: JCL 1.1 is incompatible with WAS. this appears to be an existing standing issue http://www.javablog.com/2005/12/28/1135813600066.html. i haven't managed to with work out why this is case (as yet). it does expose another place

svn commit: r381879 - /jakarta/commons/proper/logging/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/logging/LogFactory.java

2006-02-28 Thread skitching
Author: skitching Date: Tue Feb 28 18:49:34 2006 New Revision: 381879 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=381879view=rev Log: Add a diagnostic message, and add some comments related to issues when a LogFactory implementation cannot be instantiated. Modified:

Re: [logging] JCL1 LogFactory incompatibility with WAS

2006-02-28 Thread Simon Kitching
On Tue, 2006-02-28 at 22:32 +, robert burrell donkin wrote: i've downloaded and installed an evaluation version of WAS to try to confirm that WAS ships with JCL (and if so, where abouts). Great. i also plan to see if i can improve recognition of this situation and (if so) provide a

svn commit: r381886 - /jakarta/commons/proper/logging/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/logging/LogFactory.java

2006-02-28 Thread skitching
Author: skitching Date: Tue Feb 28 19:11:41 2006 New Revision: 381886 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=381886view=rev Log: * Fix minor syntax error in previous checkin (oops). * Improve error message when custom LogFactory class cannot be instantiated due to class cast issues. Modified:

svn commit: r381887 - /jakarta/commons/proper/logging/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/logging/LogFactory.java

2006-02-28 Thread skitching
Author: skitching Date: Tue Feb 28 19:15:40 2006 New Revision: 381887 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=381887view=rev Log: Another minor diagnostics tweak. Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/logging/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/logging/LogFactory.java Modified:

Re: [logging] JCL1 LogFactory incompatibility with WAS

2006-02-28 Thread Simon Kitching
On Wed, 2006-03-01 at 14:32 +1300, Simon Kitching wrote: I guess one thing we *could* do is fall back to using LogFactoryImpl if the system property points to a class that we can't cast to LogFactory. That's a pretty scary thing to do though; the application has *explicitly* set a property

svn commit: r381905 - /jakarta/commons/sandbox/scxml/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/scxml/env/AbstractStateMachine.java

2006-02-28 Thread rahul
Author: rahul Date: Tue Feb 28 20:50:53 2006 New Revision: 381905 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=381905view=rev Log: The AbstractStateMachine class demonstrates one approach for providing the base functionality needed by classes representing stateful entities, whose behaviors are

svn commit: r381907 - in /jakarta/commons/sandbox/scxml/trunk/src/test/java/org/apache/commons/scxml/env: StopWatch.java stopwatch.xml

2006-02-28 Thread rahul
Author: rahul Date: Tue Feb 28 21:12:20 2006 New Revision: 381907 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=381907view=rev Log: Towards BZ 38274 [scxml] Write Use Case for Stand-alone Application Modelling a Stop Watch A SCXML driven stop watch. Thanks to: * Stephen Colebourne, the state machine

svn commit: r381909 - in /jakarta/commons/sandbox/scxml/trunk/src/test/java/org/apache/commons/scxml/env: EnvTestSuite.java StopWatchTest.java

2006-02-28 Thread rahul
Author: rahul Date: Tue Feb 28 21:18:41 2006 New Revision: 381909 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=381909view=rev Log: A test case for the stop watch usecase. Added: jakarta/commons/sandbox/scxml/trunk/src/test/java/org/apache/commons/scxml/env/StopWatchTest.java (with props)

svn commit: r381912 - /jakarta/commons/sandbox/scxml/trunk/src/test/java/org/apache/commons/scxml/env/stopwatch.gif

2006-02-28 Thread rahul
Author: rahul Date: Tue Feb 28 21:27:52 2006 New Revision: 381912 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=381912view=rev Log: My rendition of a stopwatch. The beginnings of a UI. Miss gimp, but freestyle paint will have to do. Added:

svn commit: r381913 - /jakarta/commons/sandbox/scxml/trunk/src/test/java/org/apache/commons/scxml/env/stopwatchicon.gif

2006-02-28 Thread rahul
Author: rahul Date: Tue Feb 28 21:32:26 2006 New Revision: 381913 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=381913view=rev Log: Will throw in a stopwatch icon while I'm at it. Added: jakarta/commons/sandbox/scxml/trunk/src/test/java/org/apache/commons/scxml/env/stopwatchicon.gif (with