Re: publishing commons-modeler jar to maven 2 repo

2006-03-01 Thread Bill Barker
anita kulshreshtha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi, Geronimo uses commomns-modeler-1.1.jar. How can I get this jar published to maven2 repository? The repository has 1.1M1. Urm, just do it ;-). None of the current Modeler developers (Oops, that's me :),

Re: [email] ant dist fails / dependencies not found

2006-03-01 Thread C. Grobmeier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Thank you. I think i will document this in the build-file and sent it to you soon for a possible patch. I really don't like build-files with comments :-) - - Chris Dennis Lundberg wrote: matthew.hawthorne wrote: C. Grobmeier wrote: -BEGIN PGP

RE: [configuration] Alternative ConfigurationFactory

2006-03-01 Thread Jörg Schaible
Hi Oliver, -Original Message- From: Oliver Heger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, February 26, 2006 8:25 PM To: Jakarta Commons Developer List Subject: [configuration] Alternative ConfigurationFactory I checked in an alternative configuration factory implementation named

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-math (in module jakarta-commons) failed

2006-03-01 Thread Stefan Bodewig
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-math has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-math (in module jakarta-commons) failed

2006-03-01 Thread Stefan Bodewig
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-math has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38815] - [validator] punycode in email validation

2006-03-01 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38815. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: [logging] JCL2.0 design - API

2006-03-01 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Boris Unckel wrote: Hello, Simon Kitching wrote: == LogFactory as factory for Log instances Currently, JCL uses a LogFactory to create Log instances: Log log = LogFactory.getLog(fff); By contrast, Log4j has the factory method on the Log class: Logger log = Logger.getLog(fff); Having

Re: [all] building the site?

2006-03-01 Thread Phil Steitz
IIRC, the problem results from the fact that the entity is referenced via a relative path. Moving to a URL or File reference would require either an absolute path or that the resource be loaded from a remote URL, which would make offline builds fail. Could be there is a simple trick to make this

svn commit: r382035 - /jakarta/commons/sandbox/scxml/trunk/src/test/java/org/apache/commons/scxml/env/StopWatchDisplay.java

2006-03-01 Thread rahul
Author: rahul Date: Wed Mar 1 06:35:58 2006 New Revision: 382035 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=382035view=rev Log: A quick Swing UI to front the stopwatch usecase. Added: jakarta/commons/sandbox/scxml/trunk/src/test/java/org/apache/commons/scxml/env/StopWatchDisplay.java (with

svn commit: r382038 - in /jakarta/commons/sandbox/scxml/trunk: build.xml project.xml

2006-03-01 Thread rahul
Author: rahul Date: Wed Mar 1 06:46:35 2006 New Revision: 382038 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=382038view=rev Log: *.gif includes for test classes (such as the ones used by stopwatch UI). Regen'd ant build file as well. Modified: jakarta/commons/sandbox/scxml/trunk/build.xml

Re: [all] building the site?

2006-03-01 Thread Paul Libbrecht
Yes, if the parser knows the URL of the parsed bit, it can resolve relative entities... paul Phil Steitz wrote: IIRC, the problem results from the fact that the entity is referenced via a relative path. Moving to a URL or File reference would require either an absolute path or that the

svn commit: r382044 - in /jakarta/commons/sandbox/scxml/trunk/xdocs/usecases/scxml-stopwatch: ./ stopwatch-model.jpg stopwatch.jpg

2006-03-01 Thread rahul
Author: rahul Date: Wed Mar 1 07:07:13 2006 New Revision: 382044 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=382044view=rev Log: State chart diagrams for the stopwatch usecase. Taken from Stephen Colebourne's Javapolis slides (with one additional transition), and redone in Rational. Added:

svn commit: r382066 - in /jakarta/commons/sandbox/scxml/trunk/xdocs: navigation.xml usecases.xml usecases/scxml-stopwatch.xml

2006-03-01 Thread rahul
Author: rahul Date: Wed Mar 1 07:53:58 2006 New Revision: 382066 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=382066view=rev Log: BZ 38274 [scxml] Write Use Case for Stand-alone Application Modelling a Stop Watch Added: jakarta/commons/sandbox/scxml/trunk/xdocs/usecases/scxml-stopwatch.xml

svn commit: r382072 - in /jakarta/commons/sandbox/scxml/trunk/xdocs/usecases: ./ scxml-stopwatch/

2006-03-01 Thread rahul
Author: rahul Date: Wed Mar 1 08:24:03 2006 New Revision: 382072 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=382072view=rev Log: Screenshots for the stopwatch usecase (BZ 38274). Added: jakarta/commons/sandbox/scxml/trunk/xdocs/usecases/scxml-stopwatch/stopwatch-1.jpg (with props)

Re: [lang] initial crack at DateRange class

2006-03-01 Thread Stephen Colebourne
The question with DateRange is whether this is a direction that [lang] should go in. Joda-Time has demonstrated that there are many weird and strange things to consider when dealing with dates. Stephen matthew.hawthorne wrote: I mentioned many moons ago that I had created a DateRange class

Re: [logging] JCL2.0 design - API

2006-03-01 Thread Craig McClanahan
On 3/1/06, Emmanuel Bourg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Boris Unckel wrote: Hello, Simon Kitching wrote: == LogFactory as factory for Log instances Currently, JCL uses a LogFactory to create Log instances: Log log = LogFactory.getLog(fff); By contrast, Log4j has the factory method

Re: [logging] JCL2.0 design - API

2006-03-01 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Craig McClanahan wrote: It's possible to keep a Log interface and having one less class to import by adding a static class in the Log interface. It would look like this: Log log = Log.Factory.getLog(foo); I presume this would be implemented by making Factory a static variable? That

Re: [lang] initial crack at DateRange class

2006-03-01 Thread matthew.hawthorne
Stephen Colebourne wrote: The question with DateRange is whether this is a direction that [lang] should go in. Joda-Time has demonstrated that there are many weird and strange things to consider when dealing with dates. Understood. Well, in the meanwhile, it's in Bugzilla until a final

Re: [email] ant dist fails / dependencies not found

2006-03-01 Thread Henri Yandell
On 2/28/06, C. Grobmeier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dion Gillard wrote: The javamail jars cannot be distributed by themselves as they are licensed under the Sun Binary Code License. I thought the generated ant build.xml would allow you to

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38274] - [scxml] Write Use Case for Stand-alone Application Modelling a Stop Watch

2006-03-01 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38274. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: [logging] JCL2.0 design - API

2006-03-01 Thread Simon Kitching
On Wed, 2006-03-01 at 18:22 +0100, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: There is no variable, this would be implemented with a static inner class in the Log interface, something like this: public interface Log { ... public static class Factory { public static Log getLog(String

[configuration] User guide

2006-03-01 Thread Oliver Heger
Hi, maybe it's a question of taste, but I would prefer a single (logic) document for our user guide (with a global table of contents) over the lose collection of howtos we have now. If nobody objects, I will work on such a document. Oliver

Re: [configuration] Alternative ConfigurationFactory

2006-03-01 Thread Oliver Heger
Jörg Schaible wrote: Hi Oliver, -Original Message- From: Oliver Heger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, February 26, 2006 8:25 PM To: Jakarta Commons Developer List Subject: [configuration] Alternative ConfigurationFactory I checked in an alternative configuration factory

svn commit: r382142 - /jakarta/commons/proper/logging/branches/JCL1/

2006-03-01 Thread rdonkin
Author: rdonkin Date: Wed Mar 1 12:17:02 2006 New Revision: 382142 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=382142view=rev Log: Closing down this branch. There is still work to be done on 1.1 and 2.0 will be developed on a branch. Removed: jakarta/commons/proper/logging/branches/JCL1/

svn commit: r382143 - in /jakarta/commons/sandbox/scxml/trunk/xdocs: guide.xml guide/scxml-documents.xml navigation.xml

2006-03-01 Thread rahul
Author: rahul Date: Wed Mar 1 12:22:00 2006 New Revision: 382143 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=382143view=rev Log: Add a SCXML documents section to the user guide. Added: jakarta/commons/sandbox/scxml/trunk/xdocs/guide/scxml-documents.xml (with props) Modified:

svn commit: r382145 - /jakarta/commons/proper/logging/trunk/xdocs/troubleshooting.xml

2006-03-01 Thread rdonkin
Author: rdonkin Date: Wed Mar 1 12:32:07 2006 New Revision: 382145 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=382145view=rev Log: Updated guide to reflect changes made to diagnostics format. Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/logging/trunk/xdocs/troubleshooting.xml Modified:

Re: svn commit: r381879 - /jakarta/commons/proper/logging/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/logging/LogFactory.java

2006-03-01 Thread robert burrell donkin
On Wed, 2006-03-01 at 02:49 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: skitching snip --- jakarta/commons/proper/logging/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/logging/LogFactory.java (original) +++ jakarta/commons/proper/logging/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/logging/LogFactory.java Tue

Re: [lang] initial crack at DateRange class

2006-03-01 Thread robert burrell donkin
On Wed, 2006-03-01 at 09:26 -0800, matthew.hawthorne wrote: Stephen Colebourne wrote: The question with DateRange is whether this is a direction that [lang] should go in. Joda-Time has demonstrated that there are many weird and strange things to consider when dealing with dates.

Re: svn commit: r381879 - /jakarta/commons/proper/logging/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/logging/LogFactory.java

2006-03-01 Thread Simon Kitching
On Wed, 2006-03-01 at 20:47 +, robert burrell donkin wrote: On Wed, 2006-03-01 at 02:49 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: skitching snip --- jakarta/commons/proper/logging/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/logging/LogFactory.java (original) +++

Re: [configuration] User guide

2006-03-01 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On 3/1/06, Oliver Heger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, maybe it's a question of taste, but I would prefer a single (logic) document for our user guide (with a global table of contents) over the lose collection of howtos we have now. If nobody objects, I will work on such a document. snip/

Re: [lang] initial crack at DateRange class

2006-03-01 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On 3/1/06, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 2006-03-01 at 09:26 -0800, matthew.hawthorne wrote: Stephen Colebourne wrote: The question with DateRange is whether this is a direction that [lang] should go in. Joda-Time has demonstrated that there are many weird and

Re: svn commit: r381879 - /jakarta/commons/proper/logging/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/logging/LogFactory.java

2006-03-01 Thread robert burrell donkin
On Thu, 2006-03-02 at 10:10 +1300, Simon Kitching wrote: On Wed, 2006-03-01 at 20:47 +, robert burrell donkin wrote: On Wed, 2006-03-01 at 02:49 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: skitching snip ---

Re: [logging] JCL1 LogFactory incompatibility with WAS

2006-03-01 Thread robert burrell donkin
On Wed, 2006-03-01 at 14:32 +1300, Simon Kitching wrote: On Tue, 2006-02-28 at 22:32 +, robert burrell donkin wrote: i've downloaded and installed an evaluation version of WAS to try to confirm that WAS ships with JCL (and if so, where abouts). Great. i have WAS installed and

svn commit: r382201 - in /jakarta/commons/sandbox/scxml/trunk/xdocs: guide.xml guide/custom-actions.xml navigation.xml

2006-03-01 Thread rahul
Author: rahul Date: Wed Mar 1 15:50:38 2006 New Revision: 382201 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=382201view=rev Log: Add guide to custom actions with Commons SCXML. Added: jakarta/commons/sandbox/scxml/trunk/xdocs/guide/custom-actions.xml (with props) Modified:

svn commit: r382203 - /jakarta/commons/sandbox/scxml/trunk/xdocs/guide/scxml-documents.xml

2006-03-01 Thread rahul
Author: rahul Date: Wed Mar 1 16:15:59 2006 New Revision: 382203 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=382203view=rev Log: That can go live now. Modified: jakarta/commons/sandbox/scxml/trunk/xdocs/guide/scxml-documents.xml Modified:

svn commit: r382204 - /jakarta/commons/sandbox/scxml/trunk/xdocs/guide/custom-actions.xml

2006-03-01 Thread rahul
Author: rahul Date: Wed Mar 1 16:23:41 2006 New Revision: 382204 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=382204view=rev Log: Point to example. Modified: jakarta/commons/sandbox/scxml/trunk/xdocs/guide/custom-actions.xml Modified:

[Jakarta-commons Wiki] Update of SCXML/FrequentlyAskedQuestions by RahulAkolkar

2006-03-01 Thread Apache Wiki
Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Jakarta-commons Wiki for change notification. The following page has been changed by RahulAkolkar: http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/SCXML/FrequentlyAskedQuestions The comment on the change is: More FAQ, time for

[Jakarta-commons Wiki] Update of SCXML/FrequentlyAskedQuestions by RahulAkolkar

2006-03-01 Thread Apache Wiki
Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Jakarta-commons Wiki for change notification. The following page has been changed by RahulAkolkar: http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/SCXML/FrequentlyAskedQuestions The comment on the change is: More questions (from FAQ

[Jakarta-commons Wiki] Update of SCXML/SCXMLFaq by RahulAkolkar

2006-03-01 Thread Apache Wiki
Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Jakarta-commons Wiki for change notification. The following page has been changed by RahulAkolkar: http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/SCXML/SCXMLFaq The comment on the change is: Consolidated on other FAQ page.

[Jakarta-commons Wiki] Update of SCXML/SCXMLFaq by RahulAkolkar

2006-03-01 Thread Apache Wiki
Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Jakarta-commons Wiki for change notification. The following page has been changed by RahulAkolkar: http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/SCXML/SCXMLFaq The comment on the change is: We already have a SCXML FAQ wiki page.

[Jakarta-commons Wiki] Trivial Update of SCXML/FrequentlyAskedQuestions by RahulAkolkar

2006-03-01 Thread Apache Wiki
Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Jakarta-commons Wiki for change notification. The following page has been changed by RahulAkolkar: http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/SCXML/FrequentlyAskedQuestions The comment on the change is: Typo, need to preview

[logging] proposal for JCL2 implementation

2006-03-01 Thread Simon Kitching
Hi All, As you may have seen from the recent commit, I've added some code to proper/logging/contrib/simon/jcl2 Obviously this is very much work-in-progress; I've committed this really to ensure I don't lose the stuff. I intend to do more testing on this code to see if it stands up before

Re: [configuration] User guide

2006-03-01 Thread Oliver Heger
Rahul Akolkar wrote: On 3/1/06, Oliver Heger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, maybe it's a question of taste, but I would prefer a single (logic) document for our user guide (with a global table of contents) over the lose collection of howtos we have now. If nobody objects, I will work on such a

RE: [configuration] Alternative ConfigurationFactory

2006-03-01 Thread Jörg Schaible
Oliver Heger wrote on Wednesday, March 01, 2006 9:01 PM: Jörg Schaible wrote: [snip] - Deprecate ConfigurationFactory in favour of XMLConfigurationFactory. I guess that would be quite radical because ConfigurationFactory is certainly widely used. Besides there are a few features of