Formatter for properties file
-
Key: CONFIGURATION-218
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONFIGURATION-218
Project: Commons Configuration
Type: New Feature
Versions: 1.2 Final
Reporter: Borut Bol?ina
It would be cool
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOGGING-108?page=comments#action_12418089
]
Taras Tielkes commented on LOGGING-108:
---
Last comment: in this case I need to load the log4j adapter classes from
WEB-INF\lib, and cannot use "use_tccl=false" (I think
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOGGING-108?page=comments#action_12418088
]
Taras Tielkes commented on LOGGING-108:
---
Last comment (screenshot description) should read: ...showing the reference
graph from a GC root, through...
> Classloader re
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOGGING-108?page=all ]
Taras Tielkes updated LOGGING-108:
--
Attachment: path.gif
Screenshot from commercial JVMTI tool (YourKit) showing the reference graph
from a GC, through the leak described, to the user deploy
Classloader reference leak on Tomcat 5.5.17 with log4j in webapp
Key: LOGGING-108
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOGGING-108
Project: Commons Logging
Type: Bug
Versions: 1.1 Final
E
On 6/27/06, Edwin Ramirez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
I've started using the fileUpload component to handle form submissions
containing files. I am following a very simple example and everything
is working as expected. However, it seems that multi-value form
elements are not handled pro
Hello,
I've started using the fileUpload component to handle form submissions
containing files. I am following a very simple example and everything
is working as expected. However, it seems that multi-value form
elements are not handled properly.
For example, the select tag such as:
One
T
Guys,
There are rumours people are interested in a beer chitchat BOF kind of thing :)
Say tonight 8pm at the bar?
cheers
--
Torsten
PS: Please respond on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additi
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue a
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue a
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue affect
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue affect
On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 10:56:35AM +0200, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> while investigating some of the Gump failures (checkstyle and Jelly) I
> realized that the current trunk version doesn't include a
> org.apache.commons.cli package anymore, only a cli2 package. I guess
> this is intenti
Hi all,
while investigating some of the Gump failures (checkstyle and Jelly) I
realized that the current trunk version doesn't include a
org.apache.commons.cli package anymore, only a cli2 package. I guess
this is intentional and I'm sorry for not paying attention to it
earlier.
What is the reco
+1
Phil Steitz wrote:
In order for the nightlies to work and to avoid people having to
manually install the plugin, we should add the coberta dependency
explicity in the poms for the components that use this plugin. Any
objections to my fixing this for [scml] and others that use the report
but
On 6/27/06, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In order for the nightlies to work and to avoid people having to
manually install the plugin, we should add the coberta dependency
explicity in the poms for the components that use this plugin. Any
objections to my fixing this for [scml] and oth
On 6/23/06, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I wish I had found time to play with SCXML previously - what you've
done looks good Rahul.
Thanks for your time and the feedback.
1) What is the status of the SCXML specification? The docs currently
mention the working draft from July
+1.
On 6/27/06, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In order for the nightlies to work and to avoid people having to
manually install the plugin, we should add the coberta dependency
explicity in the poms for the components that use this plugin. Any
objections to my fixing this for [scml] an
18 matches
Mail list logo
