[.NET] RE: Proposal: Commons for .NET (dotnet)

Just yesterday, I discovered that Saxon.NET was released. They did exactly what I would like to do, reuse the existing codebase in-tact, as java source through IKVM static compilation to DLL. Where it made sense (JAXP/TRAX doesn't exist), they created a relevant C# wrapper. Following up on

RE: Proposal: Commons for .NET (dotnet)

community as well. Thoughts? http://ikvm.net http://www.saxonica.com/ -Original Message- From: Thomas Dudziak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2006 9:43 AM To: Jakarta Commons Developers List Subject: Re: Proposal: Commons for .NET (dotnet) On 3/22/06, Kevin Ross

RE: Proposal: Commons for .NET (dotnet)

Sorry, forgot the open source site: http://saxon.sourceforge.net/ -Original Message- From: Kevin Ross [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2006 12:04 PM To: Jakarta Commons Developers List Subject: RE: Proposal: Commons for .NET (dotnet) One other thought I had

Proposal: Commons for .NET (dotnet)

this, but I can contribute and I would like to help chip away at this codebase that has been so important to us in the java community. Apache's adoption of these projects can make them successful. -Kevin Ross - NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY

RE: [digester][patch] Make NodeCreateRule available through xmlru les

Developers List Subject: Re: [digester][patch] Make NodeCreateRule available through xmlrules committed. many thanks. i've replaced your author tag with an entry in the contributors list. (hope that's ok with you.) - robert On Fri, 2005-09-02 at 13:08 -0500, Kevin Ross wrote: Patch is available

[digester][patch] Make NodeCreateRule available through xmlrules

Patch is available with unit test and related changes in diff -u format. Please review and apply. Thank you. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36482 http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36482 Kevin Ross - NOTICE

RE: [VOTE] [committer] Peter Royal commons committer (specifically jelly)

+1 Kevin Ross - Xindice committer (Jelly user) -Original Message- From: bob mcwhirter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 1:21 AM To: Jakarta Commons Developers List Subject: [VOTE] [committer] Peter Royal commons committer (specifically jelly) I'd like

RE: import * vs explicit debate

that is not (implicit). This is a major advantage for a community of developers since code comprehension is accelerated. -Kevin Ross -Original Message- From: Alex Chaffee / Purple Technology [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 3:33 PM To: Jakarta Commons Developers List

[jelly] XMLParser exception patch

and toString() properly, and change this in XMLParser. I would be glad to do so if the commiters are on board. Kevin Ross PS- in the patch-diff, I left the old lines commented. Is it conventional to do so, or just make my changes? Index: XMLParser.java

RE: [jelly] XMLParser exception patch

Actually, I propose the additional: 1. JellySAXException extends SAXException 2. JellySAXParseException extends SAXParseException With the overridden toString() method. -Kevin -Original Message- From: Kevin Ross [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 20

[Jelly][contrib] Tag strategy pattern support?

are interested, let me know and I'll ship the classes (somewhere). Kevin Ross

Tomcat 4.1.12-LE-jdk14 and commons-logging

be glad to submit a patch. -Kevin Ross