[IO][PATCH] - RegexFilter support

2006-01-28 Thread Oliver Siegmar
Hello, attatched to this mail is a RegexFilter (as well as a testcase for it) for the commons-io filefilter package. I'd like to share this work with others, hope you can add it. If there's anything that has to be done before inclusion, let me know. Best Oliver commons-io_regexfilter.patch

Re: [IO][PATCH] - RegexFilter support

2006-01-28 Thread Oliver Siegmar
On Saturday 28 January 2006 21:37, Stephen Colebourne wrote: > Oliver Siegmar wrote: > > I'll add a ticket to bugzilla if this request is getting lost... > > A bugzilla ticket is best. > > However, commons-io is JDK1.2 compatible, so unless we create a 1.4 or >

Re: [IO][PATCH] - RegexFilter support

2006-01-28 Thread Oliver Siegmar
On Saturday 28 January 2006 21:05, Rahul Akolkar wrote: > Patches can and do get picked up right off of the mailing list, but I > tend to attach patches to bugzilla tickets, since I feel that patches > posted on the dev list risk getting "lost" if not picked up soon. A > bugzilla ticket will ensure

[IO][PATCH] - RegexFilter support

2006-01-28 Thread Oliver Siegmar
Hello, attatched to this mail is a RegexFilter (as well as a testcase for it) for the commons-io filefilter package. I'd like to share this work with others, hope you can add it. If there's anything that has to be done before inclusion, let me know. Best Oliver commons-io_regexfilter.patch

Re: [configuration] IniFile support

2005-04-14 Thread Oliver Siegmar
On Thursday 14 April 2005 11:42, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Ok I see your point. There was a support for default values in > PropertiesConfiguration some time ago but we removed it in favor of > CompositeConfiguration. For consistency I think we will apply the same > reasoning for INIConfiguration, th

Re: [configuration] IniFile support

2005-04-14 Thread Oliver Siegmar
On Thursday 14 April 2005 11:32, Jörg Schaible wrote: > > Many application ini files have some kind of default-section. > > Consider the following ini-file: > > [snip] > > well, such a behaviour would be different from all other configuration > implemnetations and I don't think it is worth the hass

Re: [configuration] IniFile support

2005-04-14 Thread Oliver Siegmar
On Thursday 14 April 2005 10:55, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Oliver Siegmar wrote: > > Does your implementation has default (a.k.a. global, a.k.a. common) > > section support? > > What do you mean by default section exactly ? Currently my > implementation does the followin

Re: [commons-configuration] IniFile support

2005-04-14 Thread Oliver Siegmar
Hi Emmanuel, On Thursday 14 April 2005 09:51, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Hi Oliver, thank you for offering your help. I already started working > on this. I didn't want to commit it until 1.1 was released, I'll add it > to SVN as soon as I fix a few remaining issues. Does your implementation has def

[commons-configuration] IniFile support

2005-04-13 Thread Oliver Siegmar
Hi, does someone work on the IniFile support? If not, I could do... ...just drop me a line. Cheers, Oliver - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[PATCH] [commons-configuration] - Added a preload feature to DatabaseConfiguration

2005-04-13 Thread Oliver Siegmar
Hi folks, the attachted (svn-)patch adds a preload feature to the DatabaseConfiguration class. I added (for backwards compatibility) a third constructor with a preloadData boolean variable. If this variable is set to true, all configuration data is read in one step and then cached in a local M