RE: [codec] base64 improved....

2003-02-03 Thread Tim Vernum
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] My proposal is that we add a series of boolean flags, int fields to the method signature to allow client projects to specify different levels of RFC compliance. Alternatively you could support an ErrorHandler interface, and delegate to that

RE: [beanutils] 1.6 release breaks Maven and Jelly

2003-02-02 Thread Tim Vernum
From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Bugzilla reports get mirrored to the COMMONS-DEV list already, so you don't need to do both, unless you want to discuss proposed solutions to an existing report. Specific bug reports are great. Specific bug reports with proposed

RE: more common classes need a home

2003-02-02 Thread Tim Vernum
From: Jeffrey Dever [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] put Base64 in commons-lang, This goes into codec, which is still in Sandbox. Infact there's already a Base64 there, but I'm not sure how well it matches Slide's needs. NOTICE This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and may contain

RE: [GUMP] how to point the finger?

2002-05-01 Thread Tim Vernum
From: Ovidiu Predescu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] The tool works by keeping track of who modified the files since the last build, and what were the changes in the number of regression tests. If you modify a file lets say, that introduces a regression in the automated tests, you will receive

RE: cvs commit: jakarta-commons-sandbox/jexl/examples ArrayExample.class ArrayExample.java MethodPropertyExample$Foo.class MethodPropertyExample.class MethodPropertyExample.java

2002-04-25 Thread Tim Vernum
Did you really intend to checkin the class files ? geirm 02/04/25 21:47:04 Added: jexl/examples ArrayExample.class ArrayExample.java MethodPropertyExample$Foo.class MethodPropertyExample.class

RE: cvs commit: jakarta-commons/latka/src/test/org/apache/commons/latka/junit TestJUnitTestAdapter.java

2002-04-17 Thread Tim Vernum
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Pete Kazmier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 09/04/2002 06:45:30 AM: On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 04:45:47PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: dion02/04/07 09:45:47 Modified:latka/src/test/org/apache/commons/latka/junit

RE: LogFactoryImpl.java - SecurityException

2002-03-26 Thread Tim Vernum
From: Juozas Baliuka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Would it be possible for someone to change file LogFactoryImpl.java? It currently has: } catch (SecurityException e) { } And it might be better if it had: } catch (SecurityException e) { logClassName

RE: [COLLECTIONS] [VOTE] Release Collections 2.0

2002-03-18 Thread Tim Vernum
From: Michael A. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] ArrayIterator was fail-fast. Unfortunately I can't think of a way to do it that's not really hokey. ArrayIterator can take an array of primitives, and there is no specific operation I know of to determine if an Object is an array of

RE: [COLLECTIONS] Avalon's BucketMap meets commons?

2002-03-10 Thread Tim Vernum
From: Gerhard Froehlich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Hi, we introduced a new Collection class the BucketMap into Avalon Excalibur some days ago: http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs/jakarta-avalon-excalibur/src/java/org/apache/avalon/excalibur/collections/BucketMap.java BTW: It doesn't implement

RE: Problems with commons-logging

2002-02-03 Thread Tim Vernum
I am -1 on walking the config line. No config. None. This API intends to mask all of this and allow a component to just log. The container using the component will be required to configure logging. We are not trying to replace LogKit/Log4J, we are only trying to replace

RE: (Logging)[Proposal] A little refactoring

2001-12-20 Thread Tim Vernum
From: Donnie Hale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] but can I ask where it is that log4j falls short to just use directly? http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs/~checkout~/jakarta-commons/logging/PROPOSAL.html?rev=1.4content-type=text/html

RE: Digester: Examples

2001-12-04 Thread Tim Vernum
From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sorry, I am still confused. How can I just initialize Employee with ID = 1? Digester doesn't have any support for this -- it is designed to process *all* the XML elements that match the rules you specify. If this is really what