On 5/13/05, Mario Ivankovits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After long time in the sandbox I would like to promote
commons-vfs to commons proper.
There are many user requests to enter a release cycle and
there is consent that VFS is stable enough to offer it.
(0) Rationale
commons-vfs allows
-- Cut Here --
Vote to promote the vfs package from Sandbox to Commons proper
[ ] +1 I am in favor of this action and will help
[X] +0 I am in favor of this action but cannot help
[ ] -0 I am not in favor of this action
[ ] -1 I am opposed to this action and here is why:
Vote to
On 5/14/05, Mario Ivankovits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-- Cut Here --
Vote to promote the vfs package from Sandbox to Commons proper
[X] +1 I am in favor of this action and will help
[ ] +0 I am in favor of this action but cannot help
[ ] -0 I am not in favor of this action
[
After long time in the sandbox I would like to promote
commons-vfs to commons proper.
There are many user requests to enter a release cycle and
there is consent that VFS is stable enough to offer it.
(0) Rationale
commons-vfs allows a single api to access many different
filesystem, A plugin system
obviously non-committing, but I'm willing to help out
where needed.
- Filip
Vote to promote the vfs package from Sandbox to Commons proper
[x] +1 I am in favor of this action and will help
[ ] +0 I am in favor of this action but cannot help
[ ] -0 I am not in favor of this action
[ ] -1 I
On Fri, 2005-05-13 at 16:45 +0200, Mario Ivankovits wrote:
Vote to promote the vfs package from Sandbox to Commons proper
+1
Vote to release Commons VFS 1.0:
No opinion.
Regards,
Simon
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
Vote to promote the vfs package from Sandbox to Commons proper
[X] +1 I am in favor of this action and will help
[ ] +0 I am in favor of this action but cannot help
[ ] -0 I am not in favor of this action
[ ] -1 I am opposed to this action and here is why:
Vote to release Commons VFS 1.0:
[ ] +1 I
