Re: [FileUpload] JSR-168 support in 1.1-dev: can we get a release (plan)?

2005-08-22 Thread Ate Douma
Martin Cooper wrote: On 8/21/05, Ate Douma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'm working (as committer) on Jetspeed-2, Portals Bridges and Wicket (wicket.sf.net). For all these projects I need to provide some form of JSR-168 based FileUpload. Although I found the 1.1-dev release in cvs.apache.org/rep

Re: [FileUpload] JSR-168 support in 1.1-dev: can we get a release (plan)?

2005-08-21 Thread Henri Yandell
On 8/21/05, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 8/21/05, Ate Douma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm working (as committer) on Jetspeed-2, Portals Bridges and Wicket > > (wicket.sf.net). > > For all these projects I need to provide some form of JSR-168 based > > FileUpload. > > Althoug

Re: [FileUpload] JSR-168 support in 1.1-dev: can we get a release (plan)?

2005-08-21 Thread Martin Cooper
On 8/21/05, Ate Douma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm working (as committer) on Jetspeed-2, Portals Bridges and Wicket > (wicket.sf.net). > For all these projects I need to provide some form of JSR-168 based > FileUpload. > Although I found the 1.1-dev release in cvs.apache.org/repository I'd ra

[FileUpload] JSR-168 support in 1.1-dev: can we get a release (plan)?

2005-08-21 Thread Ate Douma
I'm working (as committer) on Jetspeed-2, Portals Bridges and Wicket (wicket.sf.net). For all these projects I need to provide some form of JSR-168 based FileUpload. Although I found the 1.1-dev release in cvs.apache.org/repository I'd rather see a real 1.1 release. The current codebase hasn't b