> -Original Message-
> From: Henri Yandell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sorry to get into this one late. Had too though since I'm one of those
> > directory folks :-).
>
> I'm finally finding that I can get svn installed on suse and os x [it's
> not without issue] and am looking forwar
> CVS hackery was effectively an easy way to extend CVS.
You may be a CVS guru, but do you really want to know how many times someone
has crapped CVS by playing around with things they don't understand? Not
directly related, perhaps, but we had to fix a problem just this past week
where someone s
On Sat, 27 Mar 2004, Alex Karasulu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry to get into this one late. Had too though since I'm one of those
> directory folks :-).
I'm finally finding that I can get svn installed on suse and os x [it's
not without issue] and am looking forward to migrating to svn over the
next
Good but out of date. The subclipse web page appears to be lagging
behind
its code:
http://subclipse.tigris.org/servlets/ProjectDocumentList?folderID=2240
Yes, I did not mention it because I supect that this is not a stable
release,
and it's not available for eclipse 2.x but for eclipse 3 M7 onl
Hi,
Sorry to get into this one late. Had too though since I'm one of those
directory folks :-).
> From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Good but out of date. The subclipse web page appears to be lagging behind
> its code:
> http://subclipse.tigris.org/servlets/ProjectDocumentList?f
> > Unfortunately the latest subversion release (1.0) is still unsupported.
> Very good points, warrants for some serious consideration.
Good but out of date. The subclipse web page appears to be lagging behind
its code:
http://subclipse.tigris.org/servlets/ProjectDocumentList?folderID=2240
> Ho
My env is eclipse on win2000.
Harish Krishnaswamy wrote:
Very good points, warrants for some serious consideration. CVS support
in eclipse, especially in 3.0, is awesome. I don't know how big of a
deal it is administer CVS as compared to Subversion. I guess it is a
tradeoff. How often are we g
Very good points, warrants for some serious consideration. CVS support
in eclipse, especially in 3.0, is awesome. I don't know how big of a
deal it is administer CVS as compared to Subversion. I guess it is a
tradeoff. How often are we going to be using the unique administration
features in Sub
I agree, as long as it is not a pain to use the eclipse plugin I +1.
-Harish
Howard M. Lewis Ship wrote:
In my opinion the subclipse plugin is not as good as the (excellent) cvs
plugin. I'm missing the 'synchronize' function and it's available for
windows only.
Unfortunately the latest subversi
> Just be aware that using ssh authentication is quite a hassle with
> windows clients. It's much better to use apache and basic http
> authentication.
Not an issue here. We use HTTPS.
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
I agree, as long as it is not a pain to use the eclipse plugin I +1.
-Harish
Howard M. Lewis Ship wrote:
So, I'm trying to get back into the saddle on all this stuff.
An immediate question is whether we should use CVS or Subversion for HiveMind.
I installed the Eclipse Subversion plugin and it
An immediate question is whether we should use CVS or Subversion for
HiveMind.
I installed the Eclipse Subversion plugin and it seems to be perfectly
OK.
I think it would be a great experiment (from my perspective) to trying
Subversion; certainly, I'm
really into any system that understands t
On Fri, 26 Mar 2004, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> > This is really a much wider discussion, since HiveMind is in the Commons
> > CVS repo, not its own.
>
> No, it isn't. HiveMind has been voted by the PMC to be a Jakarta project on
> its own, and so they are deciding to which scm to move.
Click! Bra
> This is really a much wider discussion, since HiveMind is in the Commons
> CVS repo, not its own.
No, it isn't. HiveMind has been voted by the PMC to be a Jakarta project on
its own, and so they are deciding to which scm to move.
--- Noel
-
This is really a much wider discussion, since HiveMind is in the Commons
CVS repo, not its own. Either all of Commons would have to switch at the
same time (the sane approach, IMHO), or we'd have to agree to having both
CVS and SVN repos, with some projects in one, and the remainder in the
other (y
15 matches
Mail list logo
