if you do have some spare time before i post up my plan, fixes plus test
cases for some of the outstanding bugs would be very gratefully received :
)
hint taken :) I can try to take a look and see if there is anything I would be
competent enough to
try and tackle
the plan is that the
On Tuesday, February 25, 2003, at 12:09 AM, Erik Tennant wrote:
For my needs, that sounds sufficient. Any ETA on when someone might be
looking at this?
i'll probably be looking at this pretty soon. since this is a big change i'
ll probably post to the list explaining the changes first.
I'm more
PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List commons-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PATCH] [BeanUtils] Addition of ConverterSet
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] commons-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The issue:
I ran into a problem because I needed to handle the conversion going
from my view beans to my dto
.
Thanks,
Erik
- Message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 20:44:48 +
From: robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [BeanUtils] Addition of ConverterSet
To: Jakarta Commons
]
Subject: [PATCH] [BeanUtils] Addition of ConverterSet
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The issue:
I ran into a problem because I needed to handle the conversion going from my view
beans to my dto beans differently than going from my dto beans to my view beans.
The Solution
The issue:
I ran into a problem because I needed to handle the conversion going from my view
beans to my dto beans differently than going from my dto beans to my view beans.
The Solution:
I added a new class, called a ConverterSet, which maintains a set of converters. A
programmer may create
