No worries. It's probably obvious to others that I'm using you as an
example :)
The need for PMC as opposed to committer votes was something that we've
only become increasingly aware of over the last year or so and the charter
doesn't reflect that. Now you've pointed it out, updating that is
On Thu, 2005-12-15 at 07:44 +0100, Oliver Heger wrote:
> Thanks!
>
> I somehow had the impression that committers' votes were binding. Will
> have a deeper look at the charter.
this is an ASF wide rule so it's covered by the final clause (21). AIUI
the theory goes something like this:
it's not
Thanks!
I somehow had the impression that committers' votes were binding. Will
have a deeper look at the charter.
Oliver
Henri Yandell schrieb:
Robert has now voted, so that's 3 +1's and I rescind my objection :)
Hen
On Wed, 14 Dec 2005, Henri Yandell wrote:
Only Dion and Phil are on the
Robert has now voted, so that's 3 +1's and I rescind my objection :)
Hen
On Wed, 14 Dec 2005, Henri Yandell wrote:
Only Dion and Phil are on the PMC, so theirs are the only binding votes. It's
something that we need to get better at, and there's no time like the
present.
Short-term, we jus
Only Dion and Phil are on the PMC, so theirs are the only binding votes.
It's something that we need to get better at, and there's no time like the
present.
Short-term, we just need another Commons PMC member to take a look at the
release and offer their +1 if it looks good.
Medium-term, w
The Commons community has voted to release version 1.2 of Commons
Configuration.
Here are the detailed (binding) results of the vote process:
+1:
Emmanuel Bourg, Dion Gillard, Phil Steitz, Oliver Heger
+0:
Jörg Schaible
-1:
none
I will cut the release in the next few days.
Oliver
Oliver H
