Re[2]: [SURVEY] Commons-csv or not?

2003-06-30 Thread Anton Tagunov
Hello All! Just lurkering your discussion.. JM> I agree. IMHO the focus should be on any type of legacy, structured JM> ASCII files containing some notion of "record". Does not this give the new name to the project (not only the scope) ascii import-ascii oh wait, and if it is not ASCII? if

Re: [SURVEY] Commons-csv or not?

2003-06-26 Thread Ryan Hoegg
Looks great. Actually, Cocoon has a CSVGenerator now that turns CSV files into XML SAX events. Perhaps factoring stuff out of there is appropriate if we want to create an independent effort here. The other formats you mentioned interest me greatly, especially EDIFACT. -- Ryan Hoegg ISIS Netwo

Re: [SURVEY] Commons-csv or not?

2003-06-26 Thread scolebourne
start from. It also limits the number of dependencies/new projects. Stephen > from:Simon Kitching <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > date:Thu, 26 Jun 2003 08:04:51 > to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > subject: Re: [SURVEY] Commons-csv or not? > > Hmm .. an "import-stuff-i

Re: [SURVEY] Commons-csv or not?

2003-06-26 Thread Simon Kitching
Hmm .. an "import-stuff-into-xml" project? Interesting... I have in fact written exactly this for my current employer, for a (continuously expanding) series of formats. We then apply stylesheets to the results, for various purposes. I doubt I could contribute any code, but can definitely confirm

Re: [SURVEY] Commons-csv or not?

2003-06-25 Thread Jeremias Maerki
On 25.06.2003 19:59:19 Joe Germuska wrote: > A CSV project seems a bit too narrowly focused. I agree. IMHO the focus should be on any type of legacy, structured ASCII files containing some notion of "record". It's very interesting to have code around to easily convert such files to XML (SAX-Event