On Mon, 7 Jun 2004 21:24:35 -0400, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Leo,
>
> Let's get you on-board. Also, have you had a chance to work with JAM on the
> merger?
No. I never heard from the JAM developer.
/LS
-
Dirk,
I touched on the issue your bring up here:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.jakarta.commons.devel/46146
and the short version of it is:
"It appears that attributes does pretty much everything people want it
to do, and so there is little reason for anyone to dive in."
/LS
On Tue,
(3) is of course the way to go.
But do you think there is enough "community" support for it?
A couple of more names on the team list would be nice:
http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/sandbox/attributes/team-list.html
I'm only asking this because I don't see a lot of mail activity on the
lists.
Pro
Leo,
Let's get you on-board. Also, have you had a chance to work with JAM on the
merger?
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1) is putting it off.
2) is bad.
3) seems good to me. I see no reason not to propose you and see if anyone
wishes to come up with a -1, so will go ahead and do that.
Hen
On Mon, 7 Jun 2004, Leo Sutic wrote:
> All,
>
> I have received emails to the effect that releasing Attributes as-is
> would
