RE: [VOTE][EMAIL] Release Commons-Email 1.0

2004-12-15 Thread Eric Pugh
tting it in the jar file in the distribution, but no luck. Is there something obvious I am missing? Eric > -Original Message- > From: Dion Gillard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2004 5:47 AM > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > Subject: Re: [

Re: [VOTE][EMAIL] Release Commons-Email 1.0

2004-12-14 Thread Dion Gillard
Shouldn't NOTICE.TXT be in the distribution? On Fri, 3 Dec 2004 18:08:50 +0100, Eric Pugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dear community, > > Commons Email is now ready for release. The code is stable, all bugs fixed, > and the unit tests all run. Additionally the various licensing issues with >

RE: [VOTE][EMAIL] Release Commons-Email 1.0

2004-12-14 Thread Stephen Colebourne
04, 2004 4:51 PM > > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > > Subject: Re: [VOTE][EMAIL] Release Commons-Email > 1.0 > > > > > > -1 > > > > Please add NOTICE.txt to all zip files and the jar > file. > > > > Then you can have a +1 ;-) >

RE: [VOTE][EMAIL] Release Commons-Email 1.0

2004-12-13 Thread Eric Pugh
te release in 24 hours. Eric > -Original Message- > From: Stephen Colebourne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, December 04, 2004 4:51 PM > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > Subject: Re: [VOTE][EMAIL] Release Commons-Email 1.0 > > > -1 > > Please

Re: [VOTE][EMAIL] Release Commons-Email 1.0

2004-12-04 Thread Stephen Colebourne
-1 Please add NOTICE.txt to all zip files and the jar file. Then you can have a +1 ;-) Stephen - Original Message - From: "Eric Pugh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Commons-Dev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, December 03, 2004 5:08 PM Subject: [VOTE][

RE: [VOTE][EMAIL] Release Commons-Email 1.0

2004-12-04 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
--- > -Original Message- > From: Eric Pugh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, December 03, 2004 6:09 PM > To: Commons-Dev > Subject: [VOTE][EMAIL] Release Commons-Email 1.0 > > > Dear community, > >

Re: [VOTE][EMAIL] Release Commons-Email 1.0

2004-12-03 Thread David Graham
+1 David --- Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [X] +0 I support this release but am unable to help > > > On Fri, 3 Dec 2004 17:35:36 + (UTC), Henning P. Schmiedehausen > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > "Eric Pugh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > >

Re: [VOTE][EMAIL] Release Commons-Email 1.0

2004-12-03 Thread Joe Germuska
At 6:08 PM +0100 12/3/04, Eric Pugh wrote: Dear community, Commons Email is now ready for release. The code is stable, all bugs fixed, and the unit tests all run. Additionally the various licensing issues with the Sun jars and Dumbster have been resolved. I have created Release Candidate 1 distri

Re: [VOTE][EMAIL] Release Commons-Email 1.0

2004-12-03 Thread Davanum Srinivas
[X] +0 I support this release but am unable to help On Fri, 3 Dec 2004 17:35:36 + (UTC), Henning P. Schmiedehausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Eric Pugh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >--- > > [ ] +1 I support this release a

Re: [VOTE][EMAIL] Release Commons-Email 1.0

2004-12-03 Thread Henning P. Schmiedehausen
"Eric Pugh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >--- > [ ] +1 I support this release and am willing to help > [X] +0 I support this release but am unable to help > [ ] -0 I do not support this release > [ ] -1 I do not support this releas

[VOTE][EMAIL] Release Commons-Email 1.0

2004-12-03 Thread Eric Pugh
Dear community, Commons Email is now ready for release. The code is stable, all bugs fixed, and the unit tests all run. Additionally the various licensing issues with the Sun jars and Dumbster have been resolved. I have created Release Candidate 1 distributions using Maven dist, they are availa