Re: [VOTE][digester] Release Digester 1.4.1

2003-02-27 Thread robert burrell donkin
On Wednesday, February 26, 2003, at 04:38 AM, O'brien, Tim wrote: -Original Message- From: Henri Yandell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] snip 2. http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/releases.html needs to be updated to specifically talk about generating a site via Maven. ( In addition, this

[VOTE][digester] Release Digester 1.4.1

2003-02-25 Thread robert burrell donkin
digester 1.4.1 is a bug fix release. i've created release candidate distributions which can be found at: http://cvs.apache.org/~rdonkin/commons-digester/RC1/ your votes, please: Release Digester 1.4.1 - [ ] +1 I support this release and will help [ ] +0

RE: [VOTE][digester] Release Digester 1.4.1

2003-02-25 Thread O'brien, Tim
+1, this release might also be a good time to get rid of this legacy site: http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/digester/, and add a redirect to http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/digester.html. I'd be willing to help out with this. - tim -Original Message- From: robert burrell donkin

RE: [VOTE][digester] Release Digester 1.4.1

2003-02-25 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Tue, 25 Feb 2003, O'brien, Tim wrote: Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 13:26:04 -0600 From: O'brien, Tim [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'Jakarta Commons Developers List' [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [VOTE][digester] Release Digester 1.4.1 +1

RE: [VOTE][digester] Release Digester 1.4.1

2003-02-25 Thread Henri Yandell
] Subject: RE: [VOTE][digester] Release Digester 1.4.1 +1, this release might also be a good time to get rid of this legacy site: http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/digester/, and add a redirect to http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/digester.html. I'd be willing to help out with this. +1

RE: [VOTE][digester] Release Digester 1.4.1

2003-02-25 Thread O'brien, Tim
-Original Message- From: Henri Yandell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Tue, 25 Feb 2003, Craig R. McClanahan wrote: Isn't digester.html the *old* site, and don't we want the new (Maven-based) one? That's what I thought, except the maven-based one is now out of date, only