On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 11:35 +1000, Brett Porter wrote:
Thanks Robert!
I have updated commons-cli.pom
cheers
and updated the md5 to fix a parse error
what was the problem with the md5?
- so if you notice that change, don't worry - it's not gremlins again :)
cool :)
- robert
robert burrell donkin wrote:
On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 11:35 +1000, Brett Porter wrote:
Thanks Robert!
I have updated commons-cli.pom
cheers
and updated the md5 to fix a parse error
what was the problem with the md5?
sorry, what I meant was that I updated the POM to fix a
ack'd
- robert
On Sun, 2005-07-31 at 21:34 +0100, robert burrell donkin wrote:
votes for removing cli 1.0:
+1's (binding)
Yoav Shapira
Henri Yandell
Stefan Bodewig
Martin Cooper
Stephen Colebourne
Brett Porter
Dion Gillard
Phil Steitz
+1's (non
Thanks Robert!
I have updated commons-cli.pom and updated the md5 to fix a parse error
- so if you notice that change, don't worry - it's not gremlins again :)
Cheers,
Brett
robert burrell donkin wrote:
ack'd
- robert
votes for removing cli 1.0:
+1's (binding)
Yoav Shapira
Henri Yandell
Stefan Bodewig
Martin Cooper
Stephen Colebourne
Brett Porter
Dion Gillard
Phil Steitz
+1's (non binding)
Torsten Curdt
+0's (binding)
Glen Stampoultzis
votes for replacing with official
On Wed, 2005-07-27 at 09:29 +1000, Brett Porter wrote:
+1 to both.
Incidentally, I have made a copy of the bogus JAR on ibiblio that will
remain available as commons-cli-20040117.00.jar
thanks
(the last time it was modified, though not sure if it really represents CVS
at that date).
non-binding +1 for both
cheers
--
Torsten
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
i have included two separate votes in one email since they are closely
related.
the commons-cli-1.0 jar in the java repository
http://www.apache.org/dist/java-repository/commons-cli/jars/ is not the
official apache commons-cli 1.0 release. this is a clear apache policy
violation and should be
+1 to both.
On 27/07/2005, at 8:37 AM, robert burrell donkin wrote:
i have included two separate votes in one email since they are closely
related.
the commons-cli-1.0 jar in the java repository
http://www.apache.org/dist/java-repository/commons-cli/jars/ is not
the
official apache
On 7/26/05, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--8-
[X] +1 Comply with ASF policy and remove the bogus jar
[ ] +0 Sounds right but too busy to investigate
[ ] -0 Sounds list a bad idea but we should comply with ASF
--8-
[X] +1 Comply with ASF policy and remove the bogus jar
[ ] +0 Sounds right but too busy to investigate
[ ] -0 Sounds list a bad idea but we should comply with ASF policy
[ ] -1 Leave the jar ever though this breaks the ASF
+1 to both.
Incidentally, I have made a copy of the bogus JAR on ibiblio that will
remain available as commons-cli-20040117.00.jar (the last time it
was modified, though not sure if it really represents CVS at that date).
- Brett
robert burrell donkin wrote:
i have included two separate
+1 to both.
On 7/27/05, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i have included two separate votes in one email since they are closely
related.
the commons-cli-1.0 jar in the java repository
http://www.apache.org/dist/java-repository/commons-cli/jars/ is not the
official apache
+1 to both
Phil
On 7/26/05, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i have included two separate votes in one email since they are closely
related.
the commons-cli-1.0 jar in the java repository
http://www.apache.org/dist/java-repository/commons-cli/jars/ is not the
official apache
+1 to both (sorry, I check pmc email first and replied incorrectly on
that list :) )
Hen
On 7/26/05, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i have included two separate votes in one email since they are closely
related.
the commons-cli-1.0 jar in the java repository
15 matches
Mail list logo
