Re: [all] Jira reporting

2007-01-20 Thread Martin van den Bemt
That sounds nice, but than the vote needs to be on general :) I would be an favor of that.. Mvgr, Martin Dennis Lundberg wrote: > > Why not move all JIRA notifications to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ? > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL

splitting commons-dev mailing list (was: [all] Jira reporting)

2007-01-20 Thread Joerg Heinicke
Joerg Heinicke gmx.de> writes: > ... splitting it into commons-cvs|svn|scm jakarta.apache.org, > commons-jira|issues|bugs jakarta.apache.org and the actual dev list for > discussions ... I just wanted to ping on this one [1]. There seems to be much agreement about splitting the list [2]. So is

Re: [all] Jira reporting

2007-01-06 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Henri Yandell wrote: On 1/6/07, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 1/6/07, Joerg Heinicke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Henri Yandell gmail.com> writes: > > > The spam issue is a tricky decision. Sometimes I turn off the > > notifications to then do a lot of changes, other times I let t

Re: [all] Jira reporting

2007-01-06 Thread Niall Pemberton
On 1/7/07, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Joerg Heinicke wrote: > Henri Yandell gmail.com> writes: > >> The spam issue is a tricky decision. Sometimes I turn off the >> notifications to then do a lot of changes, other times I let the spam >> hit the list because moving an issue into

Re: [all] Jira reporting

2007-01-06 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Joerg Heinicke wrote: Henri Yandell gmail.com> writes: The spam issue is a tricky decision. Sometimes I turn off the notifications to then do a lot of changes, other times I let the spam hit the list because moving an issue into a version is a decision. If there were a lot of them, I'd be temp

Re: [all] Jira reporting

2007-01-06 Thread Henri Yandell
On 1/6/07, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 1/6/07, Joerg Heinicke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Henri Yandell gmail.com> writes: > > > The spam issue is a tricky decision. Sometimes I turn off the > > notifications to then do a lot of changes, other times I let the spam > > hit the li

Re: [all] Jira reporting

2007-01-06 Thread Henri Yandell
On 1/6/07, Joerg Heinicke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Henri Yandell gmail.com> writes: > The spam issue is a tricky decision. Sometimes I turn off the > notifications to then do a lot of changes, other times I let the spam > hit the list because moving an issue into a version is a decision. If >

Re: [all] Jira reporting

2007-01-06 Thread Joerg Heinicke
Henri Yandell gmail.com> writes: > The spam issue is a tricky decision. Sometimes I turn off the > notifications to then do a lot of changes, other times I let the spam > hit the list because moving an issue into a version is a decision. If > there were a lot of them, I'd be tempted to send an em

Re: [all] Jira reporting

2007-01-05 Thread Henri Yandell
On 1/5/07, Joerg Heinicke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Martin Cooper apache.org> writes: > > > Any exact targetting for unresolved issues will lead to "this > > > issues hasn't made it into the latest release, we try to get it into the > > > next one" mails polluting the mailing lists without nea

Re: [all] Jira reporting

2007-01-05 Thread Joerg Heinicke
Martin Cooper apache.org> writes: > > > Any exact targetting for unresolved issues will lead to "this > > > issues hasn't made it into the latest release, we try to get it into the > > > next one" mails polluting the mailing lists without nearly any additional > > > value. > > > > I think that is

Re: [all] Jira reporting

2007-01-03 Thread Martin Cooper
On 1/3/07, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 1/3/07, Joerg Heinicke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Henri Yandell gmail.com> writes: > > > The aim is to provide us with information on where projects are > > release-wise and where we are in terms of answering new issues. Some > > of our c

Re: [all] Jira reporting

2007-01-03 Thread Henri Yandell
On 1/3/07, Joerg Heinicke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Henri Yandell gmail.com> writes: > The aim is to provide us with information on where projects are > release-wise and where we are in terms of answering new issues. Some > of our components aren't there - for example Jelly which has 77 > unve

Re: [all] Jira reporting

2007-01-03 Thread Joerg Heinicke
Henri Yandell gmail.com> writes: > The aim is to provide us with information on where projects are > release-wise and where we are in terms of answering new issues. Some > of our components aren't there - for example Jelly which has 77 > unversioned issues and Attributes/Discovery which are ready

Re: [all] Jira reporting

2007-01-02 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Henri Yandell wrote: On 1/2/07, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Henri Yandell wrote: > Using the commons-nightly/jira-email.vm swizzle script, I've got a > report for the Commons projects that lets us see the status of things. > Here's the output: > > http://people.apache.org/~bayard/

Re: [all] Jira reporting

2007-01-02 Thread Henri Yandell
On 1/2/07, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Henri Yandell wrote: > Using the commons-nightly/jira-email.vm swizzle script, I've got a > report for the Commons projects that lets us see the status of things. > Here's the output: > > http://people.apache.org/~bayard/jira-report-for-common

Re: [all] Jira reporting

2007-01-02 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Henri Yandell wrote: Using the commons-nightly/jira-email.vm swizzle script, I've got a report for the Commons projects that lets us see the status of things. Here's the output: http://people.apache.org/~bayard/jira-report-for-commons.txt The aim is to provide us with information on where proje

[all] Jira reporting

2007-01-02 Thread Henri Yandell
Using the commons-nightly/jira-email.vm swizzle script, I've got a report for the Commons projects that lets us see the status of things. Here's the output: http://people.apache.org/~bayard/jira-report-for-commons.txt The aim is to provide us with information on where projects are release-wise a