On 1/2/07, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
I dislike the website being put in the distributions. It's a cheap way
to think you're documenting your project; but having the documentation
in there is good. I think the solution to this part is to make our
websites leaner (by moving
On 1/3/07, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/2/07, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
I dislike the website being put in the distributions. It's a cheap way
to think you're documenting your project; but having the documentation
in there is good. I think the solution to
On 1/3/07, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
Part of all that would be to take the common information out of the
component sites and into a Jakarta page for that component. Much like
the download section currently. The tricky part is one of lf, it's
very odd to jump out of a site and
Hi
I've been looking at creating distributions for commons logging using
Maven 2. So I did some reading on ASF policy regarding distributions and
poked around in different commons components, to see if I could find a
least common denominator.
Unfortunately I haven't. So I've got a couple of
I will opine a bit based on what I have personally done historically on
Commons projects, plus some thoughts on what we're currently doing in
Shale[1] that might prove to be of interest (and/or a source of ideas on how
to do it).
On 1/2/07, Dennis Lundberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
I've
On 1/2/07, Dennis Lundberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
I've been looking at creating distributions for commons logging using
Maven 2. So I did some reading on ASF policy regarding distributions and
poked around in different commons components, to see if I could find a
least common denominator.
Dennis Lundberg wrote:
1. What should a source distribution include?
Two things:
- commons-foo-1.0.jar - the binary jar
- The entire svn tree for the project
I include the binary jar file in the source distribution as I want to
ensure that the maximum number of people possible get the
On 1/2/07, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I dislike the website being put in the distributions. It's a cheap way
to think you're documenting your project; but having the documentation
in there is good. I think the solution to this part is to make our
websites leaner (by moving things
Stephen Colebourne wrote:
I include the binary jar file in the source distribution as I want to
ensure that the maximum number of people possible get the genuine binary
jar as created by us and no-one else (eg. minimises JDK1.3 vs JDK1.6 issues)
[snip]
I include the source zip in the
