On 12/21/05, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 12/20/05, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 12/20/05, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > I lack the background for a couple of directories under commons proper
> > > in SVN, but it will be nice to have tha
On 12/20/05, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 12/20/05, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I lack the background for a couple of directories under commons proper
> > in SVN, but it will be nice to have that :-) These are not in the
> > externals for trunks-proper eithe
On 12/20/05, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I lack the background for a couple of directories under commons proper
> in SVN, but it will be nice to have that :-) These are not in the
> externals for trunks-proper either.
>
> * combo/
The original theory here was that we could produc
I lack the background for a couple of directories under commons proper
in SVN, but it will be nice to have that :-) These are not in the
externals for trunks-proper either.
* combo/
Was this concept ever put in motion? (committer list shows Craig and Hen)
* docs/
Much of the stuff under docs/ i
