I do see the need to do dispatch-like things in my own applications
(although I don't take this approach). But, I would agree that a
DispatchCommand is out of scope for the core package.
As to LookUpCommand, I would favor moving config, generics, and web
into a Chain-Extras distribution, so that
Craig McClanahan wrote:
Personally, I'm leaning towards -0 (multiple execute methods per
chain seem to encourage the wrong behavior -- combining lots of
functionality into a single command versus splitting it up into fine
grained reusable chunks), but won't veto it if others think the
At 9:06 AM -0600 4/1/05, NetSQL wrote:
Craig McClanahan wrote:
Personally, I'm leaning towards -0 (multiple execute methods per
chain seem to encourage the wrong behavior -- combining lots of
functionality into a single command versus splitting it up into fine
grained reusable chunks), but won't
Well the vote results are in and the grand total is -0.5. I'm not
sure how to count Craig's -0 and Joe's +0 but I assume they cancel
each other out ;-)
More importantly I am not seeing any +1 votes for this and since this
is a group effort I will defer to the wishes of the group. I will go
-dev@jakarta.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 1:36 PM
Subject: Re: [chain] [nag] Please commit stuff for DispatchChain
I know its been a while since we discussed this ... but I would like
to bring up the issue of DispatchChain again. I have a pressing need
for something like this in my
Yahoo: jmitchtx
MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message - From: Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 1:36 PM
Subject: Re: [chain] [nag] Please commit stuff for DispatchChain
I know its been
, March 30, 2005 1:36 PM
Subject: Re: [chain] [nag] Please commit stuff for DispatchChain
I know its been a while since we discussed this ... but I would like
to bring up the issue of DispatchChain again. I have a pressing need
for something like this in my current application. I need to go
: Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 1:36 PM
Subject: Re: [chain] [nag] Please commit stuff for DispatchChain
I know its been a while since we discussed this ... but I would like
to bring up
I know its been a while since we discussed this ... but I would like
to bring up the issue of DispatchChain again. I have a pressing need
for something like this in my current application. I need to go ahead
and move it into our project codebase or have it added to
commons-chain. No hard
Just a reminder that there are some files associated with an
enhancement that need to be committed
(http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33006)
sean
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
Subject: [chain] [nag] Please commit stuff for DispatchChain
Just a reminder that there are some files associated with an
enhancement that need to be committed
(http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33006)
sean
@jakarta.apache.org
Sent: Friday, January 14, 2005 9:50 AM
Subject: [chain] [nag] Please commit stuff for DispatchChain
Just a reminder that there are some files associated with an
enhancement that need to be committed
(http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33006)
sean
I would start by saying that you can make the case for DispatchChain
more than you can for DispatchCommand or LookupDispatchCommand both of
which are now in there.
Joe should probably weigh in on this because of his initial
contribution of DispatchCommand. I added LookupDispatchCommand to
round
At 9:20 AM -0800 1/14/05, Craig McClanahan wrote:
I plead guilty to being lukewarm (is lukecold a word? :-) about
DispatchChain and friends being part of the standard chain package --
I'd like to spend some time tomorrow (Saturday) looking at the code
and seeing if I buy in to Sean's use cases.
My original post to bugzilla didn't generate any responses. I figured
once I wrote something and started pestering for a commit that would
get the discussion going ;-)
I will await your guys feedback once you've had a chance to think
about use cases, etc.
Let me know if you have any questions.
15 matches
Mail list logo
