On 18.05.2007, at 19:17, Bear Giles wrote:
Torsten Curdt wrote:
Hm... seems like I disagree here. I want a simple library that
deals with common compression and archive formats
- tar
- ar
- cpio
- gzip
- bzip2
- zip
VFS is a filesystem abstraction layer. It may use the
library
Torsten Curdt wrote:
Hm... seems like I disagree here. I want a simple library that deals
with common compression and archive formats
- tar
- ar
- cpio
- gzip
- bzip2
- zip
VFS is a filesystem abstraction layer. It may use the library but
should not provide the implementation IMO.
C
On 5/18/07, Torsten Curdt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
VFS is a filesystem abstraction layer. It may use the library but
should not provide the implementation IMO.
+1, compression is a rather important topic in itself.
--
My cats know that I am a loser who goes out for hunting every day
wi
On 18.05.2007, at 05:13, Bear Giles wrote:
Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen wrote:
I therefore suggest that the tar methods should be migrated to the
vfs module (if suitable) and that the compress module should
contain methods that can compress/uncompress streams (which is
easily extendable to fil
Hi!
> I agree that the 'compress' tar classes should be removed and a
> pointer left to the VFS project.
We've already moved an early version (before the api cleanup) of the
COMPRESS codebase to VFS.
The thing is, that VFS normally would NOT like to provide the
implementation for a certain filesys
Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen wrote:
I therefore suggest that the tar methods should be migrated to the vfs
module (if suitable) and that the compress module should contain
methods that can compress/uncompress streams (which is easily
extendable to files, http connections etc).
By doing so there wi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] skrev den 17-05-2007 00:20:
You can't do that if you only see archives as boring things used in
backups. Backups that are either windows (zip) or unix (tar), yawn.
If you go hardcore, you'll notice that a lot of common file formats
provide support for arbitrary data to be bu
On 5/16/07, Bear Giles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Torsten Curdt wrote:
> On 15.05.2007, at 23:29, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> I'm interested in merging some earlier archival work (in C) into commons
>> compress and would like to know who to coordinate with. The changes
>> will
>> be... substa
Torsten Curdt wrote:
On 15.05.2007, at 23:29, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm interested in merging some earlier archival work (in C) into commons
compress and would like to know who to coordinate with. The changes
will
be... substantial... and I'll probably just fork the project for now,
with
On 15.05.2007, at 23:29, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm interested in merging some earlier archival work (in C) into
commons
compress and would like to know who to coordinate with. The
changes will
be... substantial... and I'll probably just fork the project for
now, with
a goal of merging
> On 5/15/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I'm interested in merging some earlier archival work (in C) into commons
>> compress and would like to know who to coordinate with. The changes
>> will
>> be... substantial... and I'll probably just fork the project for now,
>> with
>>
On 5/15/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm interested in merging some earlier archival work (in C) into commons
compress and would like to know who to coordinate with. The changes will
be... substantial... and I'll probably just fork the project for now, with
a goal of merging
I'm interested in merging some earlier archival work (in C) into commons
compress and would like to know who to coordinate with. The changes will
be... substantial... and I'll probably just fork the project for now, with
a goal of merging in late summer.
Also, what version of the JDK do projects
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Niall Pemberton wrote:
> Slightly OT for this thread, but compress now has a nightly build:
> http://people.apache.org/builds/jakarta-commons/nightly/commons-compress/
That's great :-)
> Will email my fax number to Torsten/Chris and see if I can a) r
Slightly OT for this thread, but compress now has a nightly build:
http://people.apache.org/builds/jakarta-commons/nightly/commons-compress/
Niall
On 7/24/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/19/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 7/18/06, Torsten Curdt <[EMAIL PROTEC
On 7/19/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/18/06, Torsten Curdt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It's high time we just committed these changes and moved on from there,
> > I think.
>
> Yepp! That was what Mario I thought, too ...we are only waiting for
> Jim to acknowledge the softw
On 7/18/06, Torsten Curdt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's high time we just committed these changes and moved on from there,
> I think.
Yepp! That was what Mario I thought, too ...we are only waiting for
Jim to acknowledge the software grant. (*sigh*)
Gotya, which hasn't been received yet.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> Chris - do you have any more recent changes or should we go with draft 8?
I think it's better now to commit and let others participate. I have no
recent changes and would like to wait till the code is in the repos.
Regards,
Chris
-BEGIN PGP SIG
It's high time we just committed these changes and moved on from there,
I think.
Yepp! That was what Mario I thought, too ...we are only waiting for
Jim to acknowledge the software grant. (*sigh*)
cheers
--
Torsten
-
To unsubs
About a month ago there was a new draft posted, and Mario had some
comments which Chris said he'd take into consideration.
It's high time we just committed these changes and moved on from there,
I think.
Chris - do you have any more recent changes or should we go with draft 8?
- Brett
On 19
What's the status of compress?
Hen
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
21 matches
Mail list logo
