On 7/31/06, Andres Almiray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ugh! I hope you feel better by now.
Not much :)
I'd like to see commons-convert get a restart though - it's
functionality I've needed many times and come up with various
intentionally non-generic solutions (having seen how bogged down the
2006/7/31, Kris Nuttycombe [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I'd be happy to donate a little time, if someone could give a report on
what the current state of the project is and what needs to be done. Data
conversion is a significant issue where I work.
I guess convert is much more about converting one Java
I guess when I think about data conversion, I think of it in terms of
converting between Java object types, so I think our goals may mesh well
and I just didnt' express myself very clearly. For example, if convert
gets back up and running there are a number of things that I'll want to
drop in
--- Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
What are your thoughts on the current API in
commons-convert? It's
much simpler to start with that and start improving
that to get a new
codebase + software grant added in. Is it much the
same, or is there
a critical design difference?
Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
2006/7/31, Kris Nuttycombe [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I'd be happy to donate a little time, if someone could give a report on
what the current state of the project is and what needs to be done. Data
conversion is a significant issue where I work.
I guess convert is much more
On 8/1/06, Stephen Colebourne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
2006/7/31, Kris Nuttycombe [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I'd be happy to donate a little time, if someone could give a report on
what the current state of the project is and what needs to be done. Data
conversion is a
--- Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
On 8/1/06, Stephen Colebourne
I think that a key issue with its failure first
time around was scope.
Personally, I would be quite comfortable to see
[convert] only support
conversion between Objects and Strings and vice
versa. ie. a very
--- Stephen Colebourne [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IMHO, anything else leads into much more difficult
design choices, and
leads beyond the range of commons. For example, I
know that there is at
least one sf project doing Object to Object
conversions already (but I
can't find a reference).
Can
I'd be happy to donate a little time, if someone could give a report on
what the current state of the project is and what needs to be done. Data
conversion is a significant issue where I work.
Kris
Andres Almiray wrote:
Hi,
Is anyone interested in restarting the project ?
Following
(and then I promptly picked up a stomach bug and my weekend was a
waste of time).
On 7/28/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll send some thoughts at the w/e - I've been afk for most of the
week at oscon.
Hen
On 7/28/06, Andres Almiray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Is anyone
Ugh! I hope you feel better by now.
In the meantime I've been reshaping the original code
from json-lib to be more friendly. There were too many
array converters; now there are the 9 array converters
only: 8 primitive and 1 generic (works with any
converter). The last statement on the
Hi,
Is anyone interested in restarting the project ?
Following
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-274,
Henri Yandell expressed interest in allowing
multidimensional array conversions for ArrayUtils, we
agreed that a patch fo ArrayUtils would be too large
and that it would be best to try
I'll send some thoughts at the w/e - I've been afk for most of the
week at oscon.
Hen
On 7/28/06, Andres Almiray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Is anyone interested in restarting the project ?
Following
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-274,
Henri Yandell expressed interest in
13 matches
Mail list logo
