On 03/03/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/2/06, Simon Kitching <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2006-03-02 at 14:50 -0800, Henri Yandell wrote:
> > > > > We're not supposed to be using the pgp on minotaur; so my TODO is to
> > > > > figure out how to get my key off of there
On 3/2/06, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/2/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 3/2/06, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > >
> > > They're all just waiting for your "Silk" promise Martin ;-)
> >
> > Did you see my recent post to general@ on that?
> >
>
On 3/2/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 3/2/06, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 3/2/06, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On 3/2/06, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > >
> > > > Half-a-dozen, such luxuries is Commons talk ;-) You prob
On 3/2/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/2/06, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > They're all just waiting for your "Silk" promise Martin ;-)
>
> Did you see my recent post to general@ on that?
>
Yes. Let me know if I can help any, I was planning on volunteering a
On 3/2/06, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/2/06, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 3/2/06, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > >
> > > Half-a-dozen, such luxuries is Commons talk ;-) You probably need to
> > > have been recently active in Taglibs to know wh
On 3/2/06, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/2/06, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Half-a-dozen, such luxuries is Commons talk ;-) You probably need to
> > have been recently active in Taglibs to know what I'm talking about.
>
>
>
> So then nobody knows what you're
On 3/2/06, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 3/2/06, Simon Kitching <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2006-03-02 at 17:50 -0500, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
>
> > >
> > > Is that really the only reason? With [proxy] (and [scxml] as well),
> > > one of the glaring reasons I see is that
On 3/2/06, Sandy McArthur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/2/06, Simon Kitching <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > However if there isn't a community of existing apache
> > committers looking at the code, Apache doesn't *know* it's brilliant.
>
> *cough* I'm a fan of good quality control but don't too
On 3/2/06, Simon Kitching <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-03-02 at 17:50 -0500, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> >
> > Is that really the only reason? With [proxy] (and [scxml] as well),
> > one of the glaring reasons I see is that they're still in sandbox. We
> > *couldn't* release them right now
On 3/2/06, Simon Kitching <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-03-02 at 18:02 -0500, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> > On 3/2/06, Simon Kitching <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > We should probably be more careful about what projects are accepted into
> > > commons.
> >
> >
> > Agreed, but h
I'm game! Hook me up!
-Original Message-
From: robert burrell donkin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2006 5:14 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: RE: [feedparser] News / Status
On Thu, 2006-03-02 at 12:16 -0500, James Carman wrote:
> Maybe tha
On 3/2/06, Simon Kitching <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> However if there isn't a community of existing apache
> committers looking at the code, Apache doesn't *know* it's brilliant.
*cough* I'm a fan of good quality control but don't toot the Jakarta
Commons' horn too much.
eg: the current "stable"
On 3/2/06, Simon Kitching <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-03-02 at 18:02 -0500, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> > On 3/2/06, Simon Kitching <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > We should probably be more careful about what projects are accepted into
> > > commons.
> >
> >
> > Agreed, but h
On 3/2/06, Simon Kitching <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-03-02 at 14:50 -0800, Henri Yandell wrote:
> > > > We're not supposed to be using the pgp on minotaur; so my TODO is to
> > > > figure out how to get my key off of there, hope I still know the
> > > > passphrase,
> > >
> > > i hope
> PGP is the thing that stops me doing releases. I accept that it's
> important, but that hasn't helped me grokk how to do it.
Really simple. I automate it in my build script. And documented it on the
wiki.
--- Noel
-
On Thu, 2006-03-02 at 17:50 -0500, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> On 3/2/06, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I would have to agree that the release process is a bit daunting. That's
> > why I haven't released Commons Proxy 1.0 yet. I really don't know how to do
> > all of that stuff on the re
On Thu, 2006-03-02 at 18:02 -0500, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> On 3/2/06, Simon Kitching <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > We should probably be more careful about what projects are accepted into
> > commons.
>
>
> Agreed, but how do we do that?
>
> On one hand, its too easy to start a project in
On Thu, 2006-03-02 at 14:50 -0800, Henri Yandell wrote:
> > > We're not supposed to be using the pgp on minotaur; so my TODO is to
> > > figure out how to get my key off of there, hope I still know the
> > > passphrase,
> >
> > i hope so too :)
> >
> > there are various ways to export the key but c
On 3/2/06, Simon Kitching <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> We should probably be more careful about what projects are accepted into
> commons.
Agreed, but how do we do that?
On one hand, its too easy to start a project in Commons, and then have
the project stall (for a plethora of reasons). OTOH,
On 3/2/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/2/06, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > For anyone interested, I came across the following regarding Kevin Burton
> > and Feedparser
> >
> > http://tailrank.com/code.php
> >
> > Seems a shame that bureaucracy has put him
, its different.
-Rahul
> -Original Message-
> From: Rahul Akolkar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2006 12:07 PM
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [feedparser] News / Status
>
> On 3/2/06, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTE
On 3/2/06, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-03-02 at 14:03 -0800, Henri Yandell wrote:
> > Yeah, running it isn't really the problem. Managing the key when you
> > don't use it for email is the bit that got painful.
>
> you don't really need to do any key management (
On Thu, 2006-03-02 at 14:03 -0800, Henri Yandell wrote:
> Yeah, running it isn't really the problem. Managing the key when you
> don't use it for email is the bit that got painful.
you don't really need to do any key management (unless you want to). a
key used for code signing can just be get safe
On Thu, 2006-03-02 at 12:16 -0500, James Carman wrote:
> Maybe that's what was throwing me off, the PGP stuff. I started to go
> through the checklist, but I had to start installing stuff like PGP and just
> got frustrated. There should be a nice automated way to do this, since we
> do it quite o
Yeah, running it isn't really the problem. Managing the key when you
don't use it for email is the bit that got painful.
We're not supposed to be using the pgp on minotaur; so my TODO is to
figure out how to get my key off of there, hope I still know the
passphrase, come up with some kind of more-
Yep, and if you are really lazy and have a command shell available, you can use
the scripts referenced here to do the signing, verify the sigs and
create the symlinks:
http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/releases/release.html#16%20Miscellaneous
Phil
On 3/2/06, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here
On Thu, 2006-03-02 at 10:06 -0800, Craig McClanahan wrote:
> On 3/2/06, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > For anyone interested, I came across the following regarding Kevin Burton
> > and Feedparser
> >
> > http://tailrank.com/code.php
> >
> > Seems a shame that bureaucracy has put
Each step may be individually relatively easy, but collectively there is
a vasy amount to do. When you can release a sourceforge project very
easily (maven-sourceforge-plugin or manual), it just completely puts me
off releases here.
Its like [collections]. I've said I'll do a release for month
Here's an Ant target we use in JMeter for creating MD5 checksums:
Creating a PGP key is as simple as:
$ gpg -ba file
or using the verbose flags:
$ gpg --armor --output foo.tar.gz.asc --detach-sig foo.tar.gz
once you have installed GnuPG (which is not all tha
On 3/2/06, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> For anyone interested, I came across the following regarding Kevin Burton
> and Feedparser
>
> http://tailrank.com/code.php
>
> Seems a shame that bureaucracy has put him off working within the ASF.
My perception is that Kevin was never ab
On 3/2/06, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> For anyone interested, I came across the following regarding Kevin Burton
> and Feedparser
>
> http://tailrank.com/code.php
>
> Seems a shame that bureaucracy has put him off working within the ASF.
Seems a shame that he's not willing to c
t; From: Henri Yandell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2006 12:15 PM
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [feedparser] News / Status
>
> md5 bit is easy, given a command line. It's also easy to write Java
> for, and I suspect Maven 2 will eas
ailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2006 12:15 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [feedparser] News / Status
md5 bit is easy, given a command line. It's also easy to write Java
for, and I suspect Maven 2 will easily be doing that for us.
PGP is the thing tha
md5 bit is easy, given a command line. It's also easy to write Java
for, and I suspect Maven 2 will easily be doing that for us.
PGP is the thing that stops me doing releases. I accept that it's
important, but that hasn't helped me grokk how to do it.
Hen
On 3/2/06, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTE
On 3/2/06, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/2/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I wonder if that's true. The subsequent line implies it's the long
> > release process that drove him out; something I definitely can
> > sympathize with.
> >
> > So shall we a) kill FP and
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2006 12:07 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [feedparser] News / Status
On 3/2/06, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For anyone interested, I came across the following regarding Kevin Burton
> and Feedpar
On 3/2/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I wonder if that's true. The subsequent line implies it's the long
> release process that drove him out; something I definitely can
> sympathize with.
>
> So shall we a) kill FP and consider it moved, b) put FP in dormant, c)
> anyone actively w
On 3/2/06, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For anyone interested, I came across the following regarding Kevin Burton
> and Feedparser
>
> http://tailrank.com/code.php
>
> Seems a shame that bureaucracy has put him off working within the ASF.
>
That appears to be the perception, if so
I wonder if that's true. The subsequent line implies it's the long
release process that drove him out; something I definitely can
sympathize with.
So shall we a) kill FP and consider it moved, b) put FP in dormant, c)
anyone actively wanting to work on it?
Hen
On 3/2/06, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL
For anyone interested, I came across the following regarding Kevin Burton
and Feedparser
http://tailrank.com/code.php
Seems a shame that bureaucracy has put him off working within the ASF.
Niall
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMA
40 matches
Mail list logo
