In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Mario Ivankovits writes:
Ever heard of this?
I ran into a problem with a strict FTP server that needs the LIST
command to be send while on ascii mode. If it is sent on binary mode,
The RFC states the data transfer for LIST is of type ASCII or EBCDIC.
It's up to
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Mario Ivankovits writes:
Sure, I can do this, but shouldnt [net] try to be RFC compliant?
Leaving it to the user to be compliant is odd, isnt it?
The original intent of commons-net was to provide low-level access to
IETF protocols. That meant providing primitive
--- Daniel F. Savarese [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[SNIP]
any rate, I don't have a strong opinion and if most
folks think it makes
more sense for FTPClient to take care of the detail,
then let's do that.
What do others think? The trend seems to have been
to want commons-net
(at least the ftp
Hi!
Ever heard of this?
I ran into a problem with a strict FTP server that needs the LIST
command to be send while on ascii mode. If it is sent on binary mode,
the server doesn't respond properly. I think the Server behaviour is
correct acording to the FTP RFC 959, but doesn't work with VFS
