gt; Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 11:50 AM
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [general] lang scope?
>
>
> On Thursday, December 5, 2002, at 06:35 PM, Tom Drake wrote:
>
> > It sounds like I've jumped into a bit of a hornets nest.
>
> t
: Thursday, December 05, 2002 11:50 AM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [general] lang scope?
On Thursday, December 5, 2002, at 06:35 PM, Tom Drake wrote:
> It sounds like I've jumped into a bit of a hornets nest.
this is actually pretty tame :)
but it's too late t
. pattern could depend on collection whereas collection could
depend on lang.
- robert
-Original Message-
From: Rodney Waldhoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 9:47 AM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: [general] lang scope? (was Re: [collections][lang]
27;m right about this, then all this code really belongs under
the same package.
-Original Message-
From: Rodney Waldhoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 9:47 AM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: [general] lang scope? (was Re: [collections][lang] Pre
On Thu, 5 Dec 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The plan is to make [collections] depend on [lang] and deprecate the
> Predicate etc. interfaces in [collections].
At the risk of becoming increasingly unpopular with the lang folks, for
reasons similiar to those I enumerated in [1] (and others), I'm
