Re: [io] Current plan?

2003-11-24 Thread __matthewHawthorne
I haven't been able to work on [io] for awhile. The last thing I was doing was looking at the Clover report and trying to improve the test coverage. For example. EndianUtils is a class that has 0 tests -- but I didn't have a good enough understanding of it to write any. The "tasks" page conta

Re: [io] Current plan?

2003-11-23 Thread Henri Yandell
On Sun, 23 Nov 2003, Jeremias Maerki wrote: > Thanks for helping out! No problem. I've been meaning to try and get IO out for 2 years now. > I'm not sure that the last words have been spoken about this. IMHO most > of the deprecated methods using String parameters shouldn't be put into > IO, at

Re: [io] Current plan?

2003-11-23 Thread Jeremias Maerki
Thanks for helping out! I'm not sure that the last words have been spoken about this. IMHO most of the deprecated methods using String parameters shouldn't be put into IO, at least not the ones that can have the same signature with File parameters (forceDelete etc.). They encourage bad practice. j

Re: [io] Current plan?

2003-11-23 Thread Henri Yandell
On Sun, 23 Nov 2003, Jeremias Maerki wrote: > there was to say. Now it's already better and one of the next steps is > to create a FilenameUtils class with methods for people who work with > filenames instead of java.io.File. FileUtils is reserved for > java.io.File. Okay. I can get to work on

Re: [io] Current plan?

2003-11-23 Thread Henri Yandell
I'm unsure what the view is on this. STATUS.html has until maven been an official Commons file. Possibly we need to rename tasks.xml to STATUS.xml and make sure every part of the STATUS.html moves down into it. Hen On Sun, 23 Nov 2003, Jeremias Maerki wrote: > Hmm, forget that. There seems to b

Re: [io] Current plan?

2003-11-23 Thread Jeremias Maerki
Henri, thanks for helping out. I'm just scratching together some time now and then to bring IO forward. Mostly hacking on it while travelling by train. We've got some kind of todo list in the status.html. My changes in the filefilter package weren't in there but were triggered my my rewriting lis

Re: [io] Current plan?

2003-11-23 Thread Henri Yandell
Clover's already on the IO site :) Idiot me. Hen On Sun, 23 Nov 2003, Henri Yandell wrote: > > Just in case it's of use, I knocked out a clover report for IO. Have > recently reinstalled the machine, so the commons licence for clover is not > setup. > > http://www.apache.org/~bayard/io-clover/

Re: [io] Current plan?

2003-11-23 Thread Henri Yandell
Just in case it's of use, I knocked out a clover report for IO. Have recently reinstalled the machine, so the commons licence for clover is not setup. http://www.apache.org/~bayard/io-clover/ Hen On Sun, 23 Nov 2003, Henri Yandell wrote: > > Jeremias et al, > > Just wanted to ask what the curr

[io] Current plan?

2003-11-23 Thread Henri Yandell
Jeremias et al, Just wanted to ask what the current plan was for Commons IO. Do you have a todo list anywhere that you're working from? Is there anywhere I can help? Hen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additio