On Thu, 2005-11-10 at 21:04 +1300, Simon Kitching wrote:
> > Can a new release of CL rule out all the classloading problems
> > people had before?
>
>
> What's currently in SVN head will probably fix 90% of the problems, and
> is about 99% backwards compatible. I would love to see it released,
On Wed, 2005-11-09 at 21:14 +, robert burrell donkin wrote:
> i agree with ceki that the future is static (rather than dynamic)
> binding. i prefer bytecode engineering to different compilation.
And I agree with both of you - provided one of the static
implementations provides much of the cl
On Wed, 2005-11-09 at 12:48 +0100, Torsten Curdt wrote:
> > I also talked about removing the commons-logging dependency (which
> > seemed to be in agreeance at the time),
> > as at least in our environment we don't use it.
>
> The more I think about this the more I get the opinion we should
> al
Sorry I forgot that.
http://tinyurl.com/cqn75
http://svn.plexus.codehaus.org/trunk/plexus-components/plexus-
compiler/plexus-compilers/plexus-compiler-csharp/src/main/java/org/
codehaus/plexus/compiler/csharp/CSharpCompiler.java?rev=2723&view=markup
Cool will have a look
I was trying to av
true
Brett Porter wrote:
That might be nice, but I think both implementations are necessary.
Not all of us want to run our Java in IKVM.
Mark Proctor wrote:
The plexus example uses a command line compiler, would be nice if we
could use IKVM and use an embedded c# compiler - for much the same
That might be nice, but I think both implementations are necessary. Not
all of us want to run our Java in IKVM.
Mark Proctor wrote:
The plexus example uses a command line compiler, would be nice if we
could use IKVM and use an embedded c# compiler - for much the same
reason why its nice to use
The plexus example uses a command line compiler, would be nice if we
could use IKVM and use an embedded c# compiler - for much the same
reason why its nice to use Janino or Eclipse JDT over javac.
Mark
Brett Porter wrote:
Torsten Curdt wrote:
Some time back (and I'm still trying to get around
Torsten Curdt wrote:
Some time back (and I'm still trying to get around to it), I talked
about merging plexus-compiler with JCI.
plexus-compiler has a basic c# interface (as well as eclipse, javac,
jikes).
For convenience - could you send us a URL to the repository location
Sorry I forg
On Wed, 2005-11-09 at 15:51 +, Mark Proctor wrote:
> We've been discussing the logging issue over in the Drools world. We
> have decided not to fight against this, at some point or other as we
> grow our capabilities and depend more on third party libraries we are
> going to find a tool that
On Wed, 2005-11-09 at 12:48 +0100, Torsten Curdt wrote:
> > I also talked about removing the commons-logging dependency (which
> > seemed to be in agreeance at the time),
> > as at least in our environment we don't use it.
>
> The more I think about this the more I get the opinion we should
> al
We've been discussing the logging issue over in the Drools world. We
have decided not to fight against this, at some point or other as we
grow our capabilities and depend more on third party libraries we are
going to find a tool that insists on commons logging - so might as well
be now. Atleast
I also talked about removing the commons-logging dependency (which
seemed to be in agreeance at the time),
as at least in our environment we don't use it.
The more I think about this the more I get the opinion we should
also provide a commons-logging-stub.jar to satisfy commons-logging
depende
Some time back (and I'm still trying to get around to it), I talked
about merging plexus-compiler with JCI.
plexus-compiler has a basic c# interface (as well as eclipse,
javac, jikes).
For convenience - could you send us a URL to the repository location
I also talked about removing the com
Guys,
Some time back (and I'm still trying to get around to it), I talked
about merging plexus-compiler with JCI.
plexus-compiler has a basic c# interface (as well as eclipse, javac, jikes).
I also talked about removing the commons-logging dependency (which
seemed to be in agreeance at the t
Chinmay Nagarkar is going to donate a c# interface to Drools -
http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=17469068&postID=112848674485482389
I've been requesting he make this work with JCI via IKVM. If this is
possible, with some hard work I believe it could be, we might want to
change JavaCompi
15 matches
Mail list logo
